What Antivirus software is running on the exchange servers?
Is http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
relevant?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Paul
, I shall read it
though for reference, thanks.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 14:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
What Antivirus software is running on the exchange servers
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP
Try this.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
The way i do it when i have the problem is to just simply make sure they
have a Temporary Internet Folder in their roaming profile. I dont do any
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
The way i do it when i have the problem is to just simply
make sure they
have a Temporary Internet Folder
Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their infinite
wisdom decided to make Temporary Internet Files a property of the user
(i.e. in their profile
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their infinite
wisdom decided to make Temporary
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 15:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their
infinite wisdom decided to make Temporary
, UK
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 15:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001
Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of
disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network
traffic, etc), it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-)
Or maybe just to set it up correctly. We don't generally have too many
problems here with roaming
, December 04, 2001 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of
disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network traffic, etc),
it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-)
Phil
December 2001 15:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
So all you really wanted to do was complain?
Disk space is very cheap, I for one would much rather have speed then
disk space...
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of
disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network
traffic, etc), it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-)
Or maybe just to set it up correctly. We don't generally have too
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 16:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
~ndi
Well, I'm happy someone else brought the subject up as I was
going to slyly ask if anyone had a means of 'controlling' the
amount of cached/temporary
Sorry Robert, being a complete thicky here - on the workstation I assume?
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 16:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Setting cache to a small size so
:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their
infinite wisdom decided to make Temporary Internet Files
a property of the user (i.e. in their profile) as against
just one directory per PC
: 04 December 2001 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Um, security?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
Never heard of it... Care to elaborate? ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Um, security
18 matches
Mail list logo
