Sorry, but long... (names have been changed)... any suggestions would be
greatly appreciated (and constructive criticism humbly accepted).
Environment:
Mixed Mode with 3 E5.5 Servers and 5 E2K servers.
e55-mail01 - E5.5 - IMC, x.400 site connector
e55-mail02 - E5.5 - mailbox server
e55-mail0
hrm, kinda weak to me... we have 9,000 users and over 6,000 workstations
running NT... write yourself a perl script (or VB if that's your preference)
that does the updates on the local machines for the workstation AV software,
install it as a service with some logging and you're done other than
mo
I believe this is an issue that would require those users to use
authenticated SMTP... do they not have the option to authenticate to the
smtp server (in this case your exchange server) in their client?
-Original Message-
From: Network Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
no.. I believe duct tape has been replaced with liquid nail (you can get it
into smaller places) but the 'lots of it' part still applies.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Some
nothing wrong with that.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
> -Original Message-
> From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
caller id?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hello
I had a great experience with Charter last night. My modem had died on
Saturday. Just waited for things to settle before c
hrm... about 1 week ago I had a person who's laptop crashed and had to
be re-installed... I salvaged the OST from the original install and was
able to use it in the new OS install... effectively this would be
equivalent to deleting the original outlook profile (I am making the
assumption that this
If you fake it, Dell will break it, then you will yell.
>-Original Message-
>From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:28 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server
>
>
>If you want to fake it, buy a Dell.
>
>
>-Or
At one time I had a URL that would take me to a location where I could
download white papers... anyone know what if this is still available and
what the link is... I've looked all over www.microsoft.com/exchange and
TechNet... I found the HTML version of the whitepaper (tried to just
copy it to Wo
%2Fwhitepapers%2Easp
I usually just start here:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/default.asp
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Edgington, J
Under NT with Exchange installed, the '/l "C:\logname.log" would
redirect the log file for that particular backup to "C:\logname.log" ...
under Win2K Adv Server with E2K, when I attempt to give /l a location
for the logfile, it fails on that part of the command... upon looking at
the ntbackup com
that argument any more. What I did was just call
ntbackup from a batch file & then copy the log like this:
copy "%userprofile%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
NT\NTBackup\data\backup*.log" %bkdir%\logs
> -Original Message-----
> From: Edgington, Jeffrey
: ntbackup, E2K and logs
Why do you want to change the location of the log file?
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ntbackup, E2K and logs
yeah... that kinda sucks... I just
Currently my exchange environment has one copy of the 'schedule+free
busy' system folder... what I'm wondering (and finding conflicting
opinions on with no documentation to back either preference) is should I
keep a copy of this folder on multiple machines?
yes? - why? (disaster recovery)
no?
try 'shift-del'
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox
I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the
administrator
eh... you're better off just having multiple mailbox servers... if one
goes down you still have some people without e-mail but not all.
clustering adds more complication/headaches than it's worth IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
16 matches
Mail list logo
