RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Chris Scharff

How is this a critical hole from a security point of view exactly?

 -Original Message-
 From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:07 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 An Outlook session to the Exchange Server is normally 
 shareable, so any other program can use it, having an open 
 access to the user's mailbox. Since this is a critical hole 
 from a security point of view, is there any way to disable 
 this feature ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Andy David

Cuz you can share holes silly!


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable


How is this a critical hole from a security point of view exactly?

 -Original Message-
 From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:07 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 An Outlook session to the Exchange Server is normally 
 shareable, so any other program can use it, having an open 
 access to the user's mailbox. Since this is a critical hole 
 from a security point of view, is there any way to disable 
 this feature ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Rogerio Silva

It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed 
and running at a particular machine, can use an active connection
from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to have free access
to the user's mailbox. So, any form of strong authentication that
could be used to enforce the security of access to the Exchange Server
is useless, because an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be
largely used by whatever process running on that machine.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Robert Moir

 -Original Message-
 From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 17 January 2002 20:22
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed 
 and running at a particular machine, can use an active 
 connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to 
 have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of 
 strong authentication that could be used to enforce the 
 security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because 
 an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used 
 by whatever process running on that machine.

Ok. I'm logged on at my machine and I'm stupid enough to run click here to
see britney spears naked, really, not a virus
honest.exe.jpg.pif.htm.bat.com

It uses your elite security hole to send lots of emails via notepad.
It sends email via the VBA scripting interface
It installs it's own SMTP engine (like Happy99/SKA did) and sends  it's damn
email it's damn self.

What's the difference? What's the point?

-- 
This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information
that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or
unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited.

The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or
policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Chris Scharff

In your scenario there is certainly a security issue, but I don't see that
issue as Outlook. Not that there aren't a number of security issues with
Outlook, the scenario as described simply does not seem to be one of them.

A trojan has access to the contents of my inbox. So what? It could also have
access to the contents of my hard drive and any file shares to which I might
have permissions. What is the Outlook specific security issue?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:22 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed 
 and running at a particular machine, can use an active 
 connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to 
 have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of 
 strong authentication that could be used to enforce the 
 security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because 
 an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used 
 by whatever process running on that machine.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Rogerio Silva

The obvious difference is that I'm talking about the access to
my own mail stuff, not the spreading of new messages from my
place. But, as I understood, the answer is to be smart enough
to avoid Britney Spears pictures ...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Rogerio Silva

Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of vulnerability,
I could think of leaving my restricted mail and stuff at the Exchange
Server, considering the use of a robust authentication policy to access
it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)

Rogerio,

If you've got users that are able to open e-mails containing trojans,
transported by various attachment types, then you have a bigger problem.
You either have:

1.  No firewall/AV software or
2.  Bad firewall/AV software or
3.  Poorly configured firewall/AV software.

Plug your security holes from this end first, and you won't have to worry
about the multiple connections issue.

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable


In your scenario there is certainly a security issue, but I don't see that
issue as Outlook. Not that there aren't a number of security issues with
Outlook, the scenario as described simply does not seem to be one of them.

A trojan has access to the contents of my inbox. So what? It could also have
access to the contents of my hard drive and any file shares to which I might
have permissions. What is the Outlook specific security issue?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:22 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed
 and running at a particular machine, can use an active 
 connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to 
 have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of 
 strong authentication that could be used to enforce the 
 security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because 
 an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used 
 by whatever process running on that machine.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Chris Scharff

What robust authentication policy would that be? Exchange and Outlook use
NTLM authentication, I'm not aware of an optional authentication policy
available for Outlook which is more robust than that Unless there's a
3rd party product out there I don't know about. 

I can write a trojan which accesses your inbox without you even having
Outlook installed on the machine, all you need to do is be logged in as you.
I guess if you want to be really secure, you could VNC into one box and then
inside of that session open a terminal services session to another box and
then from within that window open Outlook.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:51 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of 
 vulnerability, I could think of leaving my restricted mail 
 and stuff at the Exchange Server, considering the use of a 
 robust authentication policy to access it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook session sharing disable

2002-01-17 Thread Chris Scharff

To be clear, by I can write, I mean I could design the spec on a napkin
and pass it off to one of a dozen friends who could whip up the code in
under a day. I personally couldn't write the code, even if I wanted to.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff 
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:26 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
 
 
 What robust authentication policy would that be? Exchange and 
 Outlook use NTLM authentication, I'm not aware of an optional 
 authentication policy available for Outlook which is more 
 robust than that Unless there's a 3rd party product out 
 there I don't know about. 
 
 I can write a trojan which accesses your inbox without you 
 even having Outlook installed on the machine, all you need to 
 do is be logged in as you. I guess if you want to be really 
 secure, you could VNC into one box and then inside of that 
 session open a terminal services session to another box and 
 then from within that window open Outlook.
 
 Chris
 -- 
 Chris Scharff
 Senior Sales Engineer
 MessageOne
 If you can't measure, you can't manage! 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:51 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
  
  
  Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of
  vulnerability, I could think of leaving my restricted mail 
  and stuff at the Exchange Server, considering the use of a 
  robust authentication policy to access it.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]