-
From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: Store.exe
Ya... 270,000 MB!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:40 PM
I can not vouch for comparative performance, as I have never run the same
request for each; however, isscan.exe can remove attachments based on
subject, if that is sufficient for you.
Ref:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q224493
William
-Original Message-
From:
How do you protect the box from viruses? Don't use it as a file server.
Seriously, how would a virus get on your exchange server? Do users have
mapped shares? Are you installing applications from questionable sources?
Do people have physical access to the server?
The protection value is not
Hi John
1) what is reported in the application event log? (always the first place to
look)
2) there are many post-sp3 (and post sp4 probably) fixes pertaining to
store.exe. Perhaps sp4 is a good idea?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: John Stevens
Processing
A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange
Information Store. The
Internet Mail Service is being shut down.
- Original Message -
From: Lefkovics, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
mailto:[EMAIL
It looks like something is awry. It seems to be making all your emails
flagged with High Importance!!
Better reapply the SP.
-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 7:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Title: RE: Download IE6 for redistribution
Why a
Win98 machine?
William
-Original Message-From: Siatkowski, Jason
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001
10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Download
IE6 for redistribution
Easiest way is to download
After installing the terminal services component, I would reapply sp2 from
Windows then reapply Exchange sp4.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
The most expensive memory is that which remains unused. Exchange will sue
as much RAM as it needs and/or can.
For 60 users, I would keep the other apps on a separate box.
Using dynamic buffer allocation, exchange will cede RAM to other apps that
need it; hoever, if you still feel performance
You've visited the whitepapers, yes?
William
-Original Message-
From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Tips for upgrading from 5.5 to e2k
Hi Folks
I'm looking for some advice. I'm looking for
information... *dan points to the stack of whitepapers sitting on his
desk :)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2001 07:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tips for upgrading from 5.5 to e2k
You've visited the whitepapers
--Original Message----- From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tips
for upgrading from 5.5 to e2k
You've visited the whitepapers, yes?
William
-Original Message- From: Dan
Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL
for this version. But Microsoft uses
aSAN for their Exchange farm (EMC Sym's).
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
December 06, 2001 2:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS
I have more spam here if you'd like.
William
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New Version of Antigen will have content filtering
Wow, I just joined here and look at the
Did you apply Version 2.0 of the patch?
What platform are you on?
William
-Original Message-
From: Dan Yarrow
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 12/9/01 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: OWA session timeouts changed after applying MS01-057
PS... does anyone know how to fix this issue :)
I wrote a whitepaper on this. Where the heck did I put that?
Oh, wait. Here it is:
__
How to Deploy File Level Virus Scanner Software on Exchange Server
by William Lefkovics
Do not deploy file level scanners on your Exchange
Can't you use profgen or something to create multiple profiles on each
computer and have Outlook prompt for profile?
Oh wait... Clients are NT/2000 right?
William 'up too late' Lefkovics
-Original Message-
From: Colin Maynard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/SP2Deployment.aspPossible wrappage.
William
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Is this enough? These were all sent to CA:
CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding their products.
In the past it has not been their policy to participate in these forums
because vendors aren't always treated very well. They are reconsidering
this policy.
William
to get everything straightened out. If you wanna know how messed up
they are, our exchange servers, are not only the exchange servers, but they
are also the PDC, and BDC for our domain, and they were built on FAT
partitions.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
:)
-Original Message- From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:45
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate
IT)
Is this a setup?
William
-Original Message- From: Callan,
Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Interesting? How about disappointing? And a little frustrating...
William
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: NTBUGTRAQ - Potential Problem with Microsoft Security
ve an Exchange/SAN setup and, if so, any words of
wisdom?
Karen Palmer
SCJD
-Original Message-From:
Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday,
I have not tested that.
This question is more for Microsoft, but why should I need such a powerful
browser installed on a web server?
William
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:43 PM
To: 'Lefkovics, William '; Exchange
server has IE6, but that is because I just built it. I have
installed the patcha and OWA functions fine.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NTBUGTRAQ - Potential Problem
I put the pagefile on the NAS.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Page File
Depends, but I try to put the entire thing on one partition only and that is
the system partition. It
LOL!
No, I got kicked off.
Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragging the IS
Speakin of CareBear... William doesn't run that list.
Consulting: If you're not part of the
Title: Message
If you
were in a position of influence, what really bad things about Exchange2000 would
you change and/or improve? What really irks you? What is the product
missing?
OWA?
Migration issues?
AD?
Admin?
Need
for third party apps?
I
don't have any influence, but a summary will
Version2.0. *sigh*
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Product Security [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-057 (version 2.0)
The following is a Security Bulletin from the Microsoft Product
The database size limitation remains with Exchange2000 Standard at 16GB.
The Enterprise version holds the theoretically unlimited db size.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001
Title: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)
That
last part would totally shock me.
-Original Message-From: Stephen J. Norton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:34
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Antigen
(Ejaculate IT)
Thanks
Robert. I assume you've had
on this a bit or are you just being
sarcastic. Thanks.
Steve
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06,
2001 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Antigen (Ejaculate IT)
Word of warning about
retaining Inoculate
Title: RE: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
Wait. I missed that.
Microsoft does not support Exchange over a SAN. I realize that may
not be your issue here, but it might be difficult to get good help
otherwise.
William
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
Title: Message
On
XP? Isn't it still beta3?
William
-Original Message-From: Carlos Dinapoli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:43
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Remote
Administration
First
install Adminpack from CD W2000 and before System
IssuesSubject: RE: Remote
Administration
you
can go to http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=34032area=searchordinal=21and
get the BETA
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06,
2001 3:51 PMTo: MS
What? [1]But it does 'message level
restores'!!!
http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/ProductOption.asp?ID=2765
[1] Hi Bill!
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001
1:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
That's an Exchange5.5 box, right?
Do you have lots of room for the pagefile? Have you reapplied sp4? Have
you run the performance optimizer?
William
-Original Message-
From: Kemppel, Charlean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Storage). It's been up and running
for 3 months, now.
Eric
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06,
2001 3:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
Wait. I missed
Title: Message
You've
seen the difference between night and day, right?
Well,
CA is night.
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:33
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange backup
products: BrightStor or
Title: Message
Limits
tab in mailbox store properties in Exchange System Manager.
Note
the two added bonuses here: retain mailboxes and do not purge items until
they've been saved to a backup
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
Possible scenarios for disappearring email:
1) they have a view filter at the client
View-- Current View
2) they have a POP client connected that is pulling the messages off the
server
3) they have a rule redirecting these messages elsewhere (and I actually had
a user with a rule moving
: Exchange over
a SAN
William's message woke me right up. Our new Exchange server will be
on a SAN. (gulp) Does anyone on the list have an Exchange/SAN setup
and, if so, any words of wisdom?
Karen
Palmer
SCJD
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent
Title: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)
No,
it's ok run diskkeeper over it first, then do a brick level backup
with ArghServeIT. As long as the store is on a NAS, you'll be
fine.
-Original Message-From: Cardona, Cris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06,
2001 1:52
Title: RE: Error when backing up Exch. 5.5 (using MS backup)
There
is actually some good info in the help (exadmin.chm) on modes. This
will sound rude, but search the help for 'native mode' and read the first 8
selections.
Mixed
mode is only required to communicate with Exchange5.5 servers
something
like that.. Or you could always have Don edit it??
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
December 06, 2001 3:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 2000
I didn't see an answer for this one.
There is a KB article for manually uninstalling Exchange2000.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/3/78.ASP
William
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fricke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:54 AM
To:
You mean the... *.*, except what you need list?
-Original Message-
From: Sawatzke, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Antigen File Filtering
Alright,
I've seen a few My list is bigger than your list
No, the other list
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen File Filtering
You mean the... *.*, except what you need list?
-Original Message-
From: Sawatzke
If this is Windows2000, use NTBackup to disk if you have to until proper
deployment of Exchange aware backup software is done.
Do not implement circular logging. IF you are able to do an online backup
tonight AND the log drive is full causing services to stop, then pick a
couple of logs and
No. NTBackup on W2K only will backup to file.
Also, you can install Exchange admin on another box other than the exchange
server to perform this.
William
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
6/10/01. Can I compress say
6/10/01 to 10/30/01 to gain some space? If so, can I move the previously
moved files back to the Exchange partition when I get the agent and not
have problems when that backup is finally run?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Circular Logging
That's a bargain..
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto
D'oh!
*He* works faster, too.
I'm old and slow.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Circular Logging
Kevin charges much more. You works faster, too.
-Original
install ExAdmin, it makes
Ntbackup Exchange-aware ? Sorry, William , I have (unfort.) never used
Ntbackup for Exchange backups (always inherited environments)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 19:48
To: MS-Exchange
Darn spammers. ;)
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?
300,000 damn.. What is the story with that ?
-Original Message-
From: Lynn
Let us know how your tests go. ;)
I like the OWA fixes... logoff, new mail popup...
William
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange SP2 Released
FYI it's ~190Mb
This is client-side, right?
William
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Invalid Page Fault
Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4
I have a client that keeps getting an invalid page
Title: Message
Is
this like Notes vs Exchange?
-Original Message-From: Jones Matt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001
8:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Wondering
I'm
sorry, I tried, but I can't resist this... You drink scotch and as a
Title: Message
In
Canada, we call that 'urine'.
-Original Message-From: Scot Parsons
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:09
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Wondering
I
wonder what a blend of Budweiser, Molson, Beck's, and Harp would taste
I do not drink beer and no worries; your inability to organise inbound
email does not insult me.
Have you looked at the option to forward all unresolved messages to another
host within the SMTP virtual server (messages tab)? Would that assist you?
Is the 5.5 box holding a different SMTP
Sort by subject and delete.
I go through 2,500 emails a day this way.
William
-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?
Sure.. a
Has anyone used this product, yet? (Yes, I will be trying it)
http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/default.asp?sid=1pid=55did=38
NoHTML.dll is an Outlook Add-in designed to convert HTML-based emails into
harmless messages. It works slightly differently for Outlook 2000 than it
does for Outlook 2002.
I'm not a Exchange expert
Liar! ;)
PS. Diane is correct, of course.
William
-Original Message-
From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ever growing log files
Tim, I'm not a Exchange expert,
MSMail? Marek. qMail. SLMail. iMail. jMail. NTMail. Postfix on *nix.
Sendmail. Etc. Etc. Etc.
Perhaps POP from your ISP?
William
-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: Instant Messaging Setup Problem
Oh,
and are you on Exch2K sp1 (at least)? Several fixes
therein.
-Original Message-From: exchlist
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December
05, 2001 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Instant Messaging Setup Problem
Hello,
Title: Instant Messaging Setup Problem
Nothing here?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q278974
William
-Original Message-From: exchlist
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December
05, 2001 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Instant Messaging
Basically, there is no need for Diskkeeper on your Exchange Server. What
are their reasons for installing it? The binaries seldom need defragging. ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: Butler, Mary Ann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December
The documentation explains what is needed.
The basic install only requires the core sp files (the first one on the
download page)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: Jim Traino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:15 PM
To:
So if I rename gone to lynch.scr it will get through?
Do you have a fulltime attachment blocker admin?
How about *.* except what you need?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: Terry Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:34
block.
-terry
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses
So if I rename gone to lynch.scr it will get through?
Do you have a fulltime
. I would have figured that a permission issue, or
something like that, would just kill it altogether. But I've been wrong
(several million) times before. Any other suggestions (before I head for
the roof?)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Are you on commission with those Antigen guys? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
Agreed.
-Original Message-
From:
as you brought it
up, is it possible to set NAV for Exch to do a block-all-but policy?
John
[1] admittedly haven't look very hard yet.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Make sure the very first tip of the day is how to create a rule to delete
future tips of the day. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server info
What I
No?
Should I stop doing it, then? ;)
William
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
No
.
Laura Bibel
Allegheny Energy: Information Services
Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
Were there any Computer Associates products involved in the process?
Any other antivirus products?
What version of Outlook is this? Security patch perhaps?
How did you 'add personal folders'? Pre-Outlook2002 did not always deal
with the multiple services ver well. Better to use
Title: Creation of offline adressbook
Anything in the app event log? I've seen this error in Exchange2000
before.
William
-Original Message-From: mark verschaeve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
1:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesCc: Admin Issues
Phillips.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 8:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tina
because it satisfies no positive purpose
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I'd blame ArcServe.
Otherwise... anything between the clients and the server? Is WINS/DNS
working well across the LAN?
William
-Original Message-
From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW:
Why stop there? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Have you tried...yes, simple, I know...re-installing SP4? I've found that
Sp4, possibly with an IMS hotfix
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT : What SP of Exchange ?
Got a quick question for ya'll (don't have an Exchange box in front of
me)
, 2001 4:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : What SP of Exchange ?
Nice .. You the man !
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 19:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : What SP of Exchange ?
Sp4
The event service is independent of the normal events Exchange will post to
the application event log. The event service is for server side scripting
of exchange triggered by events in certain folders. If you do not use this,
then you do not need it.
Exchange Server Event Scripting
AOL is realying SPAM? Are you sure?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: open relay lists
Does anyone know the name/address of the blacklist
group because aol is relaying spam.
Answer: All of them except the ones you explicitly allow.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking attachments
I know this has been asked many times before, but what extensions
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q262/1/51.asp ?
William
-Original Message-
From: Lyonel Tan (OSH CNS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: importing Novell Address Book into MS Outlook
Apologies for
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
Answer: All of them except the ones you explicitly allow.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto
An RFC2822 compliant Outlook Express email file.
William
-Original Message-
From: Micciche Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
On that not, anyone know what .eml files are?
List
Kevin Miller's list is superior.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
The world famous Martin Blackstone blocked extension list should help
you.
Of
course.
Section 3.21-3.23:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:46
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
question..
Hello all,
i
attachments
He probably stole it from me.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
Kevin Miller's list is superior.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
As nice as that sounds, I don't think it would fly.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
imagine it working
in most business situations.
If you told 98% of the computer user in the world to send you a PW
protect ZIP file, they would probably lose all thought ability.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:40 PM
. Those jerks!!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
Right. So block everything except that which you explicitly need.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http
Your users are not going to notice if it takes 1 second or 5 to get an
email.
Again you underestimate our users. LOL!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking
We use ViaWest, though recommending them would be a stretch.
The queuing up of SMTP email (with a low priority MX record), is a
requirement for even being considered as an ISP around here.
William
-Original Message-
From: Steve Casas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tina
, now i know who tina is. :) just got her OO message
-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay
Sent:
Why not?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tina
Don't start a mail loop.
-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
The owner can change the permissions. Then wait for directory services to
updates.
PFAdmin.exe might be handy, as well.
William
-Original Message-
From: John Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 3:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder
301 - 400 of 869 matches
Mail list logo
