Well, Don, I hope something goes down for you. It seems you're due.
Happy American Thanksgiving everyone.
William
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deleting a Single
Title: anti-relay
Depends.
I like
20. It works for me.
-Original Message-From: Edgar Guerrero Ortiz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:53
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
anti-relay
In my
servers I 've limited the number of recipients
says
anything. not that they will since William is always
right...
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
November 21, 2001 3:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay
Depends
-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
anti-relay
DAM!
spell chucker beat my joke...
Kevinm M WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
November 21, 2001 4:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 21,
2001 4:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
anti-relay [Tina]
I
noticed that 10 and counting...
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
What
is an 'SMTP feed'? Is this Exchange Server? What version? Has
it been service packed? Can you telnet to port25 and send? What is
the error? Why did Jordan unretire? What do you call the little
plastic things at the end of shoelaces? [1] How many fingers am I holding
up? How many
Are both servers connected to the internet separately? You need to protect
the one that is the internet gateway.
There is an Antigen for Exchange2000 as well as 5.5. You can download and
run the demo. It uninstalls clean if you choose not to run with it.
-Original Message-
From:
Are all the latest IIS patches on this box?
As I think others have said, it looks like NIMDA. There are several
variants of it. I just cleaned one a couple of days ago.
William
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:28 PM
Wait for all MAPI clients for the mailboxes you moved to have the
opportunity to log into their mailboxes at least once so their profile will
be automatically changed to the new server. If you remove the other one
first, the client can't find the server. If you leave the server up,
directory
Do you have one for IIS SMTP?
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS SMTP relay server - Is someone using my relay server?
I just had the same situation yesterday. Someone
It is what you scream when you are trying to remove a PCI card and it won't
budge so you pull a little harder then it suddenly gives and you slice your
hand along the aluminum edge of the opening where the card is accessible
from outside the box and you jerk your hand away as a reflex,
There
are specific components of a rule that may require it to be client-based.
Also, if the 32kb maximum is used up server-side, subsequent rules will also be
client-based.
Please
see:
http://www.slipstick.com/rules/serverbased.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original
You don't have the permissions required to complete the operation. ;)
Is this on the Exchange Server itself, by the way, or another computer with
Exchange Admin installed?
William
-Original Message-
From: Crockett, Kimberly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001
Everthing you could ever want to know is available at www.slipstick.com
The help files in Outlook2000+ are also pretty good.
William
-Original Message-
From: Jason Cordingley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Good thing you sent that with the High Importance flag...
300 mails per minute? 60x300= 18,000/hour! Larry Ellison won't believe
you!
Here is the de facto standard for securing Exchange5.5 from relay:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
I forget... did you have
Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT Realy Problem 300 Mails per minute
Importance: High
exchange 2000
each mail is 23 k
-Mensaje original-
De: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el
Title: Message
What
does event ID 1221 indicate in the application event log?
eseutil will essentially copy the entire database to a temp database,
then replace the original with the temp one. In order to accomplish this,
eseutil needs to have free disk space exceeding the actual database
Title: Message
Woohoo!
High-5!!
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Disk space on
exchange server
You
determine if the downtime you will incur is worth recovering the 8GB.
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Disk space
on exchange server
High 5
back to ya! ;o)
-Original
Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Disk space
on exchange server
Title: Message
Step1: Check the app event log. Services do not stop for no
reason.
Step2:
Discern any pattern in services halting.
Step3:
Consider re-applying the latest service pack and research potential post-sp4
fixes.
There
are many substeps between those. Kevin Miller will fill you
There are many post-sp4 hotfixes you should be aware of. The sp4
installation is not reversible.
But sp4 itself is good. The install requires stopping all unnecessary
services, including local and remote perfmons, and ensure you have a good
backup.
Also, your bridgeheads and admin station
Title: Message
Courses are great but a lot depends on the instructor.
Courses also tend to be focussed on the entire product at a basic leveland
not just as it applies to your company in the real world.
Find a
reputible Microsoft approved facility. Check out the instructor
first.
There
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Kraft, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Security
Virgins? Here in Las Vegas???
-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Seeking recommendations for Exchange Admin course
I usually keep a half doze candles, a couple of dead
Title: Message
We
still get email/fax/snailmail spam for 5.5 classes. Executrain comes to
mind.
William
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:44
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Seeking
recommendations for Exchange
Pocket book for Exchange 2000
I'd favour the help file over this. exadmin.chm
William
-Original Message-
From: Melissa Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Seeking recommendations for Exchange Admin course
In Exchange2000, there is an option to not purge retained deleted items
until they are saved to a backup set. I don't believe the equivalent
feature exists on Exchange 5.5.
William
-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001
I've
been working on it for a couple of months now.
William
-Original Message-From: Karen Palmer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:00
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Seeking
recommendations for Exchange Admin course
I have
always thought that
Title: OWA and SP4
I
assume OWA is on the same server as the primary Exchange
server?
Does
OWA work internally or from the actual server?
(Yes,
reinstalling OWA would require reapplication of sp4)
William
-Original Message-From: Eric Peeters
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
any one getting any errors
Constantly, but I try to learn from them.
I am getting some
Congratulations!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/16/01 9:10 PM
Subject: errors
any one getting any errors I am getting some?
Kevinm M WLKMMAS,
Is that a Friends reference?
Computer Associates is desperate. I predict layoffs.
William
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
How *YOU* doin?
It works very well.
What errors?
What are you logged in as?
William
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.
Has anyone had any problems with
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive
Was that Michael Duncan?
Yup. Contacted you too, I presume.
Seems like a step in the right direction.
:o) Bob
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15
, but they have had one on Just shoot me which is what I'll request
if I ever have to use the product again... ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CA becoming more
asking the person on the
other end of the phone to repeat, and sometimes even SPELL what it is they
are saying because the extremely heavy accent and lack of recognizable
diction renders their efforts all but useless.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Brand name.
No best bets. Too many variables.
Also consider what products you are most comfortable with, which vendors you
have a good relationship with.
My favourite is HP.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I would still recommend Exmerge to pst I think.
Or backup, then use Mailbox manager to toast everything older than 1 year,
keeping the backup as your archive.
Or spend money.
William
Original Message-
From: Jeff Jakubiwski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange
How do you know the data loss is 0%? Just
wondering.
-Original Message- From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:16 AM
Title: Attached file stripped off
How do
you know the IMS is doing it?
William
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file
stripped off
Anyone knows why Exchange
This
is Internet mail and the receiver only get the file name. If hetries to
open it shows an X box.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15,
2001 11:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Attached file stripped off
That Linux OS really sucks, doesn't it!
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
So, now that everyone has thrown in their two pennies on this, and
re-started
I don't even know what it is.
William
-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MS UpdateFB utility
Anybody have docs on MS UpdateFB utility? We are scheduled to use this
this
2nd quarter 2004.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
I prefer Willux.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Was that Michael Duncan?
Isn't it amazing what they'll do when sales start dropping?
William
-Original Message-
From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: CA becoming more responsive
Hi, all,
Thought
So you should.
As a small shop using Oracle and Exchange, we'll watch it too.
We're stcuk on Oracle8i for now. It has the same dataloss as Exchange - 0%.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
I feel
the same way about Exchange.
There
is no reason why Oracle couldn't produce a quality competing product to Exchange
Server. Admins would likely need to be Java enabled. But the tools
are all there.
Exchange as we know it as an application in a sense is diappearing.
I found some similarities:
1) They both cost more than sendmail
2) Neither will run on Novell
3) They both will require competent administrators to function well
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Title: Oracle vs. Exchange
I
haven't read this thread yet, but here is my issue:
I
dislike management, directors, or CEO's that choose instead of praising their
own product and providing support for that praise, they choose to ignorantly
denigrate the competition instead. I attended a
Title: Oracle vs. Exchange
I'll
take that over "The other guys suck! The other guys
suck!"
-Original Message-From: Jim Busick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001
8:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange
Yeh,
at least he isn't
Requires?
If that were so, this list wouldn't exist.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote:
3
; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
There are people working on retail products that are essentially event sinks
with a GUI interface (or MMC snap-in) to allow admins to make these changes
similar to the way this product handles disclaimers:
http://www.policypatrol.com/index.htm
William
-Original Message-
From: Mike
That's how it works. If I understand you correctly.
But how would I know... I don't even know what version you're talking about.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bailer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Scroll
http://quick-study.com/chartDetails.asp?sku=381-2
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: manual
Where can I find an easy to use manual for Outlook 2000
Monday.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: manual
Gees...What time do you start work, William?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL
Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 November 2001 12:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: manual
http://quick-study.com/chartDetails.asp?sku=381-2
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
By default Exchange5.5 will keep tracking logs for seven days, I believe.
You can change the tracking log retention in the general tab of the system
attendant properties applet in Exchange administrator.
Message tracking had to be enabled. It is not on by default.
See this page for the
Title: archive directories under imcdata directory
Section 3.27-3.30:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:17
PMTo: MS-Exchange
Hey Rodney.
Does your backup window conflict with the online maintenance?
William
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Event ID 183
Can anyone elaborate on my previous email?
Wasn't
that thread on the NT forum, Matt?
I know
it fits here better, but a few of the participants aren't
here.
William
-Original Message-From: Matt Moore
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001
11:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Note vs Exch
thingy
I don't agree with that without exception. NT Servers. Then with IIS. Or
perhaps Exchange. And some gateway antivirus application. Then some backup
agent. Then some management tool. Then some remote admin product.
William
-Original Message-
From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL
That wasn't pre-ISA?
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
If this is true, then why does Microsoft themselves use UNIX for their
SMTP firewalls?
If by administering you mean re-engineering vital components and
eliminating silly potential buffer overflow possibilities etc then I'm right
there with you buddy!
NT is not written well enough from the ground up. You can administer it til
the cows come home. Don't get me wrong, it's decent.
That would depend which Unix server you set up.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
I concur. It is all about who is running it.
If I setup a Unix
Public Folder for Contacts?
William
-Original Message-
From: Cuthbert Wangceslus Biakabatuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Company Roladex on Exchange 5.5
How do I create a company roladex on Exchange 5.5
What is wrong with a 1.9GB mailbox? Why are you rehashing old threads?
Do you have a name, or shall we assign you one?
William
-Original Message-
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/3/01 9:21 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
Hot fixes, make sure no one is running a 1.9 gig
I would suggest that most of the appended text from antivirus software was
added at the client and not the server.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Blake R. Fowkes
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/2/01 9:28 PM
Subject: RE: Default disclaimer on all outgoing
What happens when you try Chris?
Can you get OWA internally?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: Jamison, Chris
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/4/01 11:23 AM
Subject: OWA exchange2K
I can not access mail via OWA to my exchange server. I have Raptor
That is correct. The eval version is Enterprise only. The only upgrade
path is to the enterprise version. I am not familiar with a way around
this. It certainly would not be supported.
Section 3.12-3.14:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec3.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+,
CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding their products.
In the past it has not been their policy to participate in these forums
because vendors aren't always treated very well. They are reconsidering
this policy.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
Here is the list of
list... ;)
-Original Message- From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Computer
Associates
CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding their
products. In the past it has not been
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Computer Associates
CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding
Subject: RE: Computer Associates
I hope to GOD someone at CA sees this and passes it on.
You obviously put a lot of work into the William. Good job!!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
, unreliable
products with a comical level of support, and expect people to use them to
get business critical systems back up and running in the event of a disaster
which was quite possibly caused from using said product in the first place?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
:
Computer Associates
I hope to GOD someone at CA sees this and passes it on.
You obviously put a lot of work into the William. Good
job!!
-Original Message- From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:
Computer Associates
I hope to GOD someone at CA sees this and passes it on.
You obviously put a lot of work into the William. Good
job!!
-Original Message- From:
Lefkovic
Friggin' POP connectors!
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Connector for POP3 Mailboxes Service
[mailto:mail-daemon@localhost]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Lefkovics, William
Subject: Returned Mail: Undeliverable Mail
The original message was received on Fri, 2 Nov
Title: Message
Try
warming the medicine up first next time.
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001
1:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Computer
Associates
I
took some cold medicine and it has me loopy...
Title: Nachricht
These
are hardcoded.
Section 3.35:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-From: Hans Willi Kremer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:58
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Computer Associates
Personally, I don't mind vendors participating as long as they are
reactive
and not proactive
majority of Exchange orgs, it probably won't
be a regular maintenance tool.
- Original Message -
From:
Lefkovics, William
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:26
AM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
Sure. Some
Title: Message
The
document predates IIS5. It still works.
William
-Original Message-From: Zamanian, Behzad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:04
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: owa ON A
DIFFERENT SERVER.
Thanks
for the detailed message on
Title: Message
What is this, coffee talk?
-Original
Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:52
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Faxing
Faxination vs
Faxmaker
which is
better?
Michael Ross
Network
1) configure MX records.
2) add second domain through default recipient policy (or your custom
recipient policy)
william
-Original Message-
From: Tianhong Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Domain name change
Title: Message
There
is no performance optimizer in Exchange2000. (perhaps it will arrive in a future
sp sp2 is very close)
Instead you:
Stop. Dismount. Move. Remount.
See
how Exchange2000 can be so much more fun?
William
-Original Message-From: Diane Beckham
[mailto:[EMAIL
Allegheny
Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001
1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Sure
MSHARIK
::hug::
/MSHARIK
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ARGGHHSEERRVVEE!
So I tested my backups again today. I was able to successfully restore the
DB's (priv and
-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
November 01, 2001 11:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Faxing
What is this, coffee talk?
-Original
Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01
But
why? NTBackup on Windows2000 to file.
-Original Message-From: Matt Bullock
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001
4:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Still out
of Disk space
I have
a personal exchange server I use for a few friends, and it
and a scone, come back, read which drives it chooses, make changes, click
OK...
Yes, I
can see why I just what to JUMP into E2K :-)
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01,
2001 12:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE
??
They
are all quality name brands. THough I'd go for Dell before
Compaq.
William "HP shop" Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-From: Matt Moore
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001
5:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: I got a
tough one
I think I am still on 6.61 sp1. Thanks.
I also got a reply from Computer Associates with that one. Apparently they
do not like what I have to say about their products. Unfortunately they are
3 years late in expressing their concern.
William
-Original Message-
From: James Gosnold
Title: Message
I run it because that is the ONLY way to
regain space in the Exchange DB that has been freed up by messages being deleted
etc. If I did not do this on a regular basis I would hit the Exchange 5.5
IS limit.
1) That logic is so flawed I can smell it from here. (Forgive
me if
I doubt your server made that decision on its own. It is NT that is the
eval version and not Exchange, right?
I have never used this tool. UDecide.
-Original Message-
From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
Use it
onlywhen it's needed.
It is
run regularly only by misinformed admins that:
1)
consider their email content and server non-critical.
2) do
not need email to be available to their users 24/7.
3)
enjoy playing with the cleaning people on the IT
chesterfield.
William
Title: Message
My
wife says that, too.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31,
2001 8:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Most
the people here who use it on a monthly basis would have a very difficult time
through its GUI interface. Very secure, very
reliable. We got the IP 330 model with 3 interfaces for private, public
DMZ. Works great.
HTH
Bob Peitzke
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: Message
I have
never experienced this feature.
William
Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
Apologizing
for Microsoft *features* since
1987.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:25
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
You're old.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
So what! Practice your Disaster Recovery procedures. Your excuse is weak!
I've
You've educated your users.
Some advise their users that IT can restore individual messages back 5
years. Just ask!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you
401 - 500 of 869 matches
Mail list logo
