I don't think there is a specific limit for deleted item retention. The
practical limit would be disk space.
9 days might be it, though.
William
-Original Message-
From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Exchange is not a full-featured list server unfortunately.
Some tools:
http://www.slipstick.com/exs/lists.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Randy Lauritzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
a production Exchange server behind a
Windows-based 'firewall' product.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Lefkovics
Title: Message
Sure. Some people reboot their servers weekly,
too.
For
the average deployment, offline defragging using eseutil as a regular
maintenance toolremains a complete waste of time and
resources.(Read:reclamation of whitespace that will be reused
anyway)
William
-Original
There is NO business that needs BLB. (MAYBE if you can afford Commvault)
-Original Message-
From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
Horses for Courses
I've overwritten backups tapes by that point.
Different companies have different requirements of course. Our
users/clients understand that EVERY email they've EVER composed or received
is NOT available to them.
The occassional restoration of a single email is simply not worth the
headache,
Title: Message
For
those that do not know, Scott Scholl is a Windows2000/NTServer MVP and co-author
of Exchange2000 Server:the Complete Reference.
William
-Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:57
AMTo: MS-Exchange
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
There is NO business that needs BLB. (MAYBE if you can afford Commvault)
-Original Message
won't provide much, if any, benefits.
For the large majority of Exchange orgs, it probably won't be
a regular maintenance tool.
- Original Message -
From:
Lefkovics, William
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:26
AM
Subject: RE
-mail addresses for customers? Outlook, a
database, etc?
-Original Message- From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailing
Lists
Exchange is not a full-featured list server
unfortunately
Does
http://ipaddress/exchangework?
Troubleshooting Guide for
OWA:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_tshoot.asp
William Lefkovics, MCSE,
A+
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:51
Title: Message
16GB
for standard.
16TB
(theoretical) for Enterprise.
William
-Original Message-From: Howie Pince
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:50
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
What
is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit?
12
GBor 14?
days - or about 68 years!
That should be enough even for my clients :) Now, how do I persuade
them to buy enough storage. Half a dozen 60GB discs should keep them
going for a while.
SB
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
I
would guess, if Michèle were to deploy Exchange in a law firm, email archiving
policy would be so clearly documented and implemented that nobody would dare ask
about a wayward email from the days of yore.
A
total guess though.
- If We Don't
Take Care of the Customer, Maybe They'll Stop Bugging Us
-
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31,
2001 12:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange
,
CKWSE
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
October 31, 2001 10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil
16GB
for standard.
16TB
(theoretical) for Enterprise.
William
-Original Message
Um...
yes.
IIS is
mandatory for Exchange2000.
William
-Original Message-From: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:41
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS
?
No.
-Original
Message-From: Matt Moore
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Outlook Connections through a firewall
You
should deploy a VPN solution to minimise risk.
William
-Original Message-From: exchlist
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October
31, 2001 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Outlook Connections through a firewall
freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31,
2001 1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Eseutil
Sure. Some people
to
be the most common reason for firewall penetration over the next few years.
Cheers,
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall
It would be incorrectly
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?
If you
really had no budget you would use the backup software that came freewith
your WindowsOS and does not perform Brick Level (or whatever the marketers are
calling it these days) backups.
I use
a P166 with 32MB RAM - my recovery
Ping to FQDN replies immediately?
Anything else between the workstations and server?
Are the clients of sufficient power? Is the server overburdened?
William
-Original Message-
From: Garrett Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:13 PM
To:
, but this year I am an Exchange MVP.
Oh, and its Schnoll, not Scholl. :-)
shameless self-promotion
Exchange 2000 Server: The Complete Reference - ISBN 0072127392
/shameless self-promotion
:-)
- Original Message -
From:
Lefkovics, William
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Title: Message
Simple
Version:
Exchange5.5 CD
Start--Run--Setup
Install the OWA components.
William
-Original Message-From: Zamanian, Behzad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:34
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: owa ON A DIFFERENT
SERVER.
HAS
Title: Message
Your
logic is still flawed.
regaining 2 GB worth of space is worthy of running eseutil on a
monthly basis.
1) The
space you think you are recovering is getting used up again anyway. If the
numbers you indicate are consistent, then your priv.edb would actually REMAIN
the
your Linux Firewall
or if you'd prefer, a firewall on a secure OS.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall
Yes unless your smtp mail is coming in on a
Mark, what is this BENT?
Backup Exec for NT?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup happening too fast?
I have basically the same setup as you except my IS
I would try recreating the profile and see if the views change.
Yes, it could be a problem in the mailbox. Anything in the app event log
(probably not)?
William
-Original Message-
From: Andrew J. Lund, MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:34 PM
To:
:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup happening too fast?
Don't think I'm impersonating Mark here William, but your right, BENT =
Backup Exec for NT.
Nice abbreviation eh? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 October 2001
Title: Telnet info
Why? Does it bother you that is says that? You could
put something in front of it, like an SMTP relay that says something
else.
Or you
could configure your PIX firewall to display Exchange.
William
-Original Message-From: Leon Raskin
[mailto:[EMAIL
ather information about the system, we're recommend to
change it" etc
Same
for web server. :-)
Well,
they recommended, I have to change it ;-)
Bigll
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October
30, 2001 12:26 PMTo: M
Title: Message
Party
pooper.
-Original Message-From: Vincent Britton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001
10:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Telnet
info
Title: Message
It
should.
When
blocking by domain you included the "@" symbol, yes?
William
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:15
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Blocking
email
Exchange 5.5
sp4:
using
or
@domain.com should block all email from that domain.. it
doesnt
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October
30, 2001 1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Blocking email
It
should.
When
blocking by domain
mail
yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should block all
email from that person
or
@domain.com should block all email from that domain.. it
doesnt
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,
October 30, 2001 1:17 PMTo: M
com should block all email from that domain.. it
doesnt
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,
October 30, 2001 1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Blocking email
It should.
: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October
30, 2001 12:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Blocking email
Did
you stop and restart the IMS?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001
.
-
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001
3:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Blocking
email
Did
you stop and restart the IMS?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday
? Anything in the
app event log (long shot)?
William
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:18
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Blocking
email
yes
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William
diagnostics logging in IMS properties applet.
William
-Original Message-
From: Lyonel Tan (OSH CNS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: imcdata
MS Exch 5.5 SP3
Does anyone know where the setting is to activate
Title: Telnet info
But
that is for Exchange2000, which uses the SMTP Service from IIS. That's
much easier to deal with.
William
-Original Message-From: Michael L. Callahan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:42
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
- could you point me in that direction.
I need one badly. If I had a secure OS I could spend 5-8% of my work time
sleeping.
ellery
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Use proper font?
Oh, and make subfolders and share the folders.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bailer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Contacts
How do I share some contacts in outlook
Too annoying. I have 2200 contacts. I share 500 of them.
Subfolders or Public folder is the far better solution.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
There came a time when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful
than the risk it took to blossom. -Anais Nin
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange
1) recover from deleted items (assuming deleted item retention was enabled).
2) Restore from backup.
The first is well documented in exadmin.chm I believe.
Good thing it's a test box, eh?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Exchange2000 sp1?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IM Not Working
Okay, I checks and the IM is Enabled, and I checked the login name and
it is Stephen@moses which is
We use Exchange5.5 AND Proxy BEHIND an OpenBSD firewall.
Yes, SMTP uses port 25.
William
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall
Hello All,
Does anyone
Title: RE: HELP! - Running Outlook and Outlook Express on the same machine
What
changed?
IMS
properties? Anything in the app event log? DNS changes?
Anything at all?
William
-Original Message-From: Sharicz, Andrew
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:39
I believe a utility is here, but I have no time to look at the moment:
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/calendar.htm
W
-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: New Public Folder Calendar
such as delivery to their Exchange
mailbox instead of the personal folder they have been
using. the way users are though, I would let them keep
their personal folders for referencing old mail and
start them fresh with new exchange mailboxes. Just my
experience and opinion. Hope it helps you.
Phil
--- Lefkovics
Is it possible to use NT backup over the network to back up the info store
from the production server then restore it over the network to a recovery
server of a different name?
I do it monthly [1]. It is outlined in the DR whitepapers. Do not restore
the dir.edb.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
It's so much easier!
I'll let Simon tell you.
-Original Message-
From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files
Simon, how do this work in EK2000?
Title: RE: Strange occurrance
It is
likely an unusual circumstance. Now if you get repeats of this event, then
a closer look would be warranted.
Speaking of unusual events, Microsoft releases XP on Don Ely's
birthday. Coincidence?
William
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Win9x, a remote desktop product would work. VNC, pcSomewhere, etc.
William
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to get Exchange administrator Running on a desktop
Use
The domains do not have to be trusted. Pass through authentication works.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q146/3/21.asp
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:13 PM
To:
Title: RE: (Slightly) Saving Outlook Email to text
Indeed. There's a KB article for that. Also could be routing
was messed up. Something was most likely changed.
But I
think there is often accompanying event ID's in the log with a
2140.
William
-Original Message-From: Brad
Title: RE: (Slightly) Saving Outlook Email to text
Is
2140 the only error in the event log?
William
-Original Message-From: Jason Cordingley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001
11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Error
2140
Next
monday I start at a
I've always advocated putting the OWA box internal to your network.
OWA accesses the exchange server using MAPI, therefor requiring several
compromisable ports to be open. Depending on what else you use your DMZ
for, this may not be acceptible. Others will say OWA internally is
-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October
25, 2001 2:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
announcement
Do
you swallow?
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001
11:53 AMTo: MS
: RE: Exchange 2000
what would you say is the easiest way to find them??
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
This is a limitation on the migration process
Perhaps open Outlook with the /cleansomethingorother switch.
Just a sec.
/cleanreminders
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Occasionally a user's
The primary documentation comes from the horse's mouth as it were.
Office2000:
http://www.microsoft.com/PressPass/press/1999/Oct99/AccessWorkflowPR.asp
Exchange:
In MSDN online, the section called:
Developing Workflow Applications for Exchange Server
I also have Mindy Martin's book which has a
Title: RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files
Hi
Jennifer.
I
guess we are assuming this is Exchange5.5?
Consider doing full backups nightly. (It would be my choice
wherever possible for Exchange.)
You
have 2 hard drives, C: and D:? Perhaps a new drive F:\ is in
order?
As
There are always issues.
However, by putting Exchange on Windows2000, you've helped eliminate some of
those issues. It'll be easier with Exchange already on W2K rather than
still on NT.
William
-Original Message-
From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Definitely. Circular logging should only be for bridgehead servers/OWA
Servers with no mailboxes.
William
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Little bit more Exchange info
I attended Michèle's wedding. My guess is since your
spare time is used learning XP and MSI, she is 'getting it' more than
you.
In business, time doesn't stand alone. It is a variable
that must also be combined unfortunately with money and
effort.
My recommendation would be to rebuild
Is
this over a VPN?
William
-Original Message-From: Albert Vasquez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:49
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Remote
connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.
I am
in the process of migrating our dept
Yarrow MCSE ADIT
NT/2000 Systems Administrator
Central Queensland University
Information Technology Division
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +61 7 4923 2151
Fax +61 7 4930 9254
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 03:22
To: MS
It is
cheaper if the ISP hosts your email. You can host it for a lot less than
Exchange, too. If you are just using Exchange for basicemail you
paid too much!
I
think the headaches will still be there.They'll just be different
ones. You are entrusting the service provider to have full
Tools--Options--Mail Services--Reconfigure Mail Support.
Might require the CD or network installation point.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Exchange lists are notoriously rude. It's the best part.
I'd go nuts trying to read this list in digest mode.
William
-Original Message-
From: Kevin D. Alons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sending HTML to list
Whatever does cause it to stop often tells the application event log.
William
-Original Message-
From: Duck, Triva B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folders
What would keep public folders from
You only need what you need.
(Did that make sense?)
William
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exch 5.5 SP 4
Hi all,
I'm just now getting around to upgrading my test
It is accurate for Outlook2000 as the Exchange client.
William
-Original Message-
From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?
Hi,
Our company is moving to Exchange and we
the sender by return e-mail and delete the
correspondence.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001
2:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
Recovery Question
EXACTLY SAME HARDWARE AND
SOFTWARE LAYOUT
What he said.
-Original Message-
From: John Eddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?
Scott,
This is the way I understand it.
Step back a couple years first:
Outlook 2000 ships in
I have not worked in NTMail, but perhaps this resource offers some
assistance?
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/E2KMigrateTools.asp
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Mark Shelton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:21 AM
To:
This
help?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239639
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-From: m2web
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:28
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Tombstone
Does anyone know how to change the
From their site, I don't see an Exchange Agent.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Schutte, Keith [EPT/FLO] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Syncsort Backup Express
Has anyone had any
- it just depends on the company.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:21 PM
To: MS
From what?
-Original Message-
From: Fitz Carlile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchangelist digest: October 20, 2001
how do i unsubscribe?
List Charter and FAQ at:
Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
to change outlook to the internet mode or you use Outlook
Express.
The reply address configured in the properties page of the Outlook
Internet
Mail Service will then be used...
(as far as I remember)
Ricki
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet
There are several as already mentioned, but being a few thousand of us got
together and I was voted the one to ask:
Why would you want to denigrate your powerful Exchange server by calling it
an email client? POP3 connectors don't even work.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
Hi Evan
Are you running any file level anti-virus or file level back up on this box?
Is that the only item in the app event log?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 10/20/01 8:32 AM
Subject: Kinda
Correct. Only one Reply address per mailbox at one time.
Further reference to the whole process:
Section 3.21-3.23:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent:
Well, based on not using eseutil without reason, you're a fine admin.
Use of the utility is the exception (major mailbox migration, deleteion of
lots of data) not the rule (regular use).
I would even say, regular use of the utility is the opposite of maintenance.
Yes, it has it's place.
at his request.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:41 PM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: Database size
Offline defrag is necessary regular maintenance task
No it isn't.
never make a change or perform any task of significance
I'm testing it right now.
William
-Original Message-
From: Rick Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Retrospect Exchange Agent
Is anyone using the Retrospect Exchange backup agent? I have a customer that
is
-
From: Lefkovics, William
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:41 PM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: Database size
Offline defrag is necessary regular maintenance task
No it isn't.
never make a change or perform any task of significance
without being 110% sure
I typically stop
, don't go to all that trouble just for me. ;-) BTW
they're running NT 4 SP6a w/ Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. What are you testing
on?
Rick Collins
RCNetwork Management
http://www.rcnetman.com
561-336-0059
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
a new NLM and
stayed up months at a time (I had one that ran for 18 months straight w/o a
single hiccup)
Yeah, things are much better now..
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
And this is what can happen when you run eseutil indiscriminately:
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/productdetail.aspx?prodno=998358zoom=yes
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
For performance and disaster recovery, without going into detail, the most
important installation aspect in my mind is to maintain the logs and
databases on separate spindles.
William
-Original Message-
From: Ratini Heidi - IL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001
are knowledgeable enough to diagnose that but most exchange admin are
not. Most look for other issues first.
Once again the benefit for a small organization is very - very small.
ellery
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:57 PM
Siegfried Weber (www.cdolive.com) and Kevin Snook are two people here that
can code just about anything.
All I can say, is yes it is possible. I highly doubt a wizard exists,
unless we are referring to Siegfried.
The answer is also different based on which Exchange version.
William
Keep your test totally separate. Unless migration is imminent.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2k Testing
Hi All,
I am planning to do
Kevin Miller on this list has done over 100 Exchange2000 implemetations.
I've done a few as well.
There is little to fear.
William
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Duey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
You got a site with the previous 212 rules?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k Testing
You are not safe...
Rule 213. [1] NEVER. Let me say that again NEVER.
501 - 600 of 869 matches
Mail list logo
