...@safeway.com]
Sent: 29 November 2010 09:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Yup - and by their reasoning, it probably should.
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
In what way do they think that a VPN is any better than a SSL certificate?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 2:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Yup - and by their reasoning, it probably should.
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Exchange 2003
Ok. So my auditors want us to use a VPN to
Conversation: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
Subject: RE: OWA/ActiveSync Exchange 2003
In what way do they think that a VPN is any better than a SSL
certificate?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com
Check IIS settings for both the Default Website and the OWA virtual directory.
May need to change the Require Secure Channel setting under Secure
Communications.
We had to set our Default Website to OFF and then OWA to ON to get the
redirection to work.
ItÂ’s called SafeHTML.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899394
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Fergal O Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA and
potentially harm a
desktop.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Fergal O Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Exchange Sp1 2007
I will assume this applies
I will assume this applies for Exchange 2007 Enterprise?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 January 2008 17:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA and Exchange Sp1 2007
It's called SafeHTML.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899394
Regards,
Michael B
A separate OWA server in Exchange2000 is VERY different AND require the
Enterprise version.
Please read the FrontEnd-BackEnd whitepaper and return with more
questions.
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KFrontBack.
asp
William
-Original Message-
From: Jesse
You will need Exchange Enterprise version if you want a separate OWA boxen.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange 2000
I've had OWA (on Exchange 5.5) running
Ah.. well, see how you find these things out after-the-fact if you don't
research it ahead of time? haha.. Doh! Ok.. well, I'm already running
Exchange 2000 Standard Edition. Not the enterprise version... So, my
previous configuration of a seperate OWA box is not an option right?
Unless I just
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange 2000
Ah.. well, see how you find these things out after-the-fact if you don't
research it ahead of time? haha.. Doh! Ok.. well, I'm
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange 2000
OWA installs by default with Exchange 2000 when installed 'fresh'. OWA relies on IIS to function.
As a side note, the latest version of OWA is very good - the interface is much more intuitive. However it isn't compatible with all versions of IE. I had to do
Hi Fred:
Pros: Single admin entity
Simple for small deployments
Less hardware, therefor cheaper.
Cons: IIS and the related patches reside on the mail server.
Server performance burdened with IIS and Exchange on the same box.
Applying IIS patches to your exchange
the patches are
applied.
Thanks,
fred
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Hi Fred:
Pros: Single admin entity
Simple for small deployments
, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Thanks William,
You always have great info to share...as usual...we are a small enterprise
(under 50 people)...so I don't think performance will be an issue (also
upgrading the exchange server hardware)...your
.
Thanks again,
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
It makes no sense to me to maintain it on a separate server for less than 50
people
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
5.5 OWA works great under WIN2K IIS 5.0
5.5 also works very well under WIN2K SP2(W/FRS HOTFIX).. Frankly I think it's the most stable platform available for Exchange email.
But I know William would disagree... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez
-- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
William,
I will be moving my old exchange server(ex55sp4,NT4sp6,BDC) to the new
server
of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
The Ed Crowley move method is perfect for what you are attempting.
Make sure to overplay
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
LOL!
Why
won't it install on my VALinux box?
Exchange2000 on Windows2000 in a Windows.Net forest
runs awesome!
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Oh yes, no need to address questions to individuals. The cumulative talent
pool here is very good.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
William,
I
Title: Message
LOL!!
And
when is the OPEN BSD version going to BETA??
.NET
(NOW ENOUGH TRICKS)
hehehe
-Original Message-From:
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA on Exchange
LOL
Hey...that's not a bad idea...is it real Technical?...can I have a copy?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Let me know if you need a multipage timeline w
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Fred,
I realize your question was directed to William, but I'm going to offer my
02 anyway.
I recently completed a move from an NT4.0(SP6a) Exchange 5.5 server (SP4) to
a Win2K(SP2
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
No lack of opinions on this alias (pointing finger at self)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Perfect, perfect, perfect
Under 50
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA on Exchange
How many users ?
- Original Message -
From: Fred Valdez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin
. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 06 December 2001 02:08
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
It would be Paul Robichaux but I can't confirm he's from the Alabama
clan. To quote the article: In addition, you can't use
No
Laura Bibel
Allegheny Energy: Information Services
Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: David Vicente [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
No?
Should I stop doing it, then? ;)
William
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
) 853-3600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
No?
Should I stop doing it, then? ;)
William
: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
Why, yes, you should stop!!!
Seriously??? I just got done reading my December issue of Exchange Outlook
administrator and Paul says you can't
He wanted to use 5.5 to see 2k
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
You can't use OWA2000 to access
, December 05, 2001 9:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
You can't use OWA2000 to access Exchange5.5. What does the article say (to
confirm)?
Is this Paul Robichaux of the Alabama Robichaux's?
Section 4.1 4.2:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec4.htm
Never mind.. Lxydexia is getting to me...
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 -- Exchange 2K
He wanted to use 5.5 to see
My installation is similar to yours.
Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0 on one box
OWA on NT 4.0 on another box
Enable the http protocol on the Exchange server, set up OWA in IIS on the
OWA box, set the default webpage. Both boxes are SP6a.
I haven't seen any good whitepapers on doing this.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_ts
hoot.asp
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 18:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA for Exchange 5.5 on a IIS5 server (not exchange) -who
thinks
37 matches
Mail list logo
