I've D/L'ed and installed WebAdmin 1.0 from Microsoft. It's powerful, but
far from a finished product, and pretty buggy in some areas. Has anyone
else continued development on this and if so, where can it be found?
Thanks.
List Charter and FAQ at:
centers.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange escalation engineer (OT)
I just got offered
Who? Me?
I've got to write two articles between now and January 2. I'm not going
anywhere! :-P
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 9:04 PM
And I would add - this behavior says that you are probably missing the
trusted root on the workstation (or an intermediate root).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 24
, that just means they drive down the street. For
most, it means airports and hotels.
PSS generally stays at home; except for premier engineering that may be
deployed in 'fly and fix' situations.
I'm not clear on the escalation backend on how you get from 'a' to 'b'.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
When Exchange MVPs == Andy and Martin
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 11:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange escalation
In this case? Nope. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange escalation engineer (OT
No it doesn't.
Tell us the business application and perhaps we can suggest something else.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:44 PM
To: MS
Not Exchange, but Outlook certainly can; based on various contents of the
headers of an e-mail.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:13 PM
titled 'Tis The Season to Host - Or Not.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hosted Exchange...
Exchange
Can IMail change the subject when it does the forward? (Like IMAILFWD:)???
That is the only thing that I can think of...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
You need to run the netlogin stop, remove database, netlogin start process
to clean up the records.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
It's probably at the administrative group level. Use adsiedit or ldp to view
that.
That being said, domain admins are restricted from that behavior by default.
Are your managers domain admins? That wouldn't be a normal type of set up.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: happy New Year!
June 2008
On Jan 1, 2008 11:47 AM, [EMAIL
Someone has to read the install guide first. :-)
Wrappage:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/12/05/file-level-antivirus-for-exchange.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto
DPM 2007 and other VSS-based products (including BackupExec and others)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup
I do not believe so. It's heavily dependent on A/D for a number of features
it provides.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Exchange has no concept of holidays, I'm afraid.
You could certainly wrap up an installer, I guess. But it's probably too
late for that now.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Do you have a DMZ domain? You can trust and backup remote forests; and I
know the ports can be specifically identified.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:40 PM
a custom version in
SBS 2000), I had as many as eight engineers working with me to make that
right. It took 3 days. And cost me - you guessed it - about $250.
Yes, sometimes frontline support can be idiots - but I've never had MSFT
fail me in a critical support situation.
Regards,
Michael B
Iisreset.exe
Or you could figure out why the service is crashing and fix that problem.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
I would be examining the event logs immediately before the services failed.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Promodag and Quest both have good reporting packages.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Matthew McComas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange reporting
That was an sp1 enhancement, wasn't it?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Edge Transport Kick in the pants
it is required.
In a prior life I wrote applications that did this kind of thing.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
databases - up to and including
Exchange 2007! (Fixed in update rollup 3.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Do Anonymous and Default have create item permission?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 5:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder
Cross-posted to Exchange and Sysadmin.
Wrappage:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/01/03/more-issue
s-with-the-windows-server-2003-scalable-networking-pack.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
~ Ninja Email
Online recovery is the first resort (i.e., letting the database engine play
back it's logfiles). I would consider recovering from backup then playing
back logfiles to be the second resort. Finally, database repair (eseutil +
isinteg) to be the last resort.
IMHO. YMMV.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Eseutil's /p option (repair) followed by isinteg. But it should really be
considered a method of last resort.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:31 AM
Other than the specific tools used, restoration and/or repair of an Exchange
database is EXACTLY THE SAME as restoration and/or repair of a Microsoft SQL
database.
In fact, I could truthfully argue that in the repair situation, Exchange is
EASIER than Microsoft SQL.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
I have a vague memory of this first appearing between 2000 and 2003 at one
point and it having something to do with mismatched default message
encoding.
Why aren't you sending e-mail from the Exchange 2007 servers directly?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
One or two firings generally takes care of problems like this.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Jason Benway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 4:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RPC
Once you've got it on one machine, it's a trivial matter to export.
Granted, that does require a smarter user.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 5:44
You can look at the deviceid that connected in terms of mobile devices; and
for personal computers, you can look at the versions of Outlook connecting.
If it isn't the corporate version then you know something is going on, ne'?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
Then you fire'em. :-P
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 7:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC-Http Access
insert sarcastic question
MAPI users?
For 700 total users I would be hard pressed to justify more than a single
server. OK, perhaps two, CAS + MB. But that's probably it, max.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL
Eh, you've gotta have pretty high volume to run into the problem.
And, in Exchange 2007, they added LOTS more digits to the sequence number.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
What version of Exchange?
For Exchange 2000/2003:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321721/en-us
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:21 AM
Sure. No problem. What isn't working?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Relaying email from
Murray Murray Murray..you know better than this. J
What, exactly, is the rule? (Change email addresses as appropriate of
course.)
What precedes and succeeds the rule in your rule list?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Murray
Yeppers.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Log Files
I've got an odd one that I've not seen before
That is correct.
Uh...you might want to wait on the removal until all users have a had a
chance to check in and get redirected.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
As Web said, wait two hours before getting your ducks wet.
Or bounce the information store service if it's really important.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Andrew Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008
Wow. I never heard of this one.
1) Are you referring to the pre-Windows 2000 logon name (i.e.,
sAMAccountName) or to the Universal Principal Name?
2) Did you run ExBPA? (If not, I might can get this added as a rule. I can
certainly suggest it to the appropriate parties.)
Regards,
Michael B
Yeah, it sucks. In several ways.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 4:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Message Tracking strangeness
The data in the logs is great. If you are PS savvy, you can get great data.
It's just the GUI that leaves so much to be desired.
And yes, I think it's the same DGV.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL
of Exchange topics would you like to see covered in blogs and
articles that you don't see being covered? Or that you don't get enough
details about? The more specific the better!
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark
Cached mode or not?
How many servers in your topology?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folder - Gone
OK. Do you see it from OWA?
I'm guessing you won't. And it'll disappear from cached mode in a day or so,
when that change replicates down to your desktop.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
It would've been different for YOU - but the same for all the other users in
cached mode.
A delay in synchronization is one of the tradeoffs associated with using
cached mode.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Joe Heaton [mailto
?
As far as Exchange topics and articles, there don't seem to be any
references available for 2007 equal to the technical reference library that
was available for 2003.
_
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
.
_
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What would YOU want to know?
OK, I ask these questions for my own benefit. I hope you'll forgive me.
1] Let's assume that a book regarding using Exchange 2007
Well, I think the available for download is the kicker. There is a huge
amount of documentation available for Exchange 2007, but 95% of it is WRO
(Web Release Only).
Personally, jumping from webpage to webpage gives me a headache.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
and Exchange 2007.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2003 Max .OST file size
Does anybody know
I can tell you how to force it, if you want to know (it involves using
adsiedit). But I have no idea why the tab is greyed out.
(It's getting reset because of a process called DS2MB that resyncs
information from A/D to the IIS metabase.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
It's not a capability built into the product.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Synching PF calendars
/exchange-a
ctive-directory-and-wins.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Recipient Policies Update Issue
You have to create a new request not a renewal. That's why you have to
create a new site.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:52 PM
To: MS
I dunno. Most sites want a new CSR not a renewal CSR. I've been creating
dummy sites (or using openssl to generate fresh CSRs) for years.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Interestingly, in Windows Server 2008, you create and renew certificates at
the Web Server level; not the Web Site level.
In other words, it is finally at the proper place.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael B
You still assign an individual cert to one or more sites (as in the case of
a UCC or wildcard cert), but as you say, the management is at the server
level.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL
Are your Exchange stores finishing nightly maintenance every night?
You don't say how LARGE the mailbox is. For a large mailbox, I would
consider 10 MB trivial. For a small one, it may or may not be significant.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
HAHAHAHAHA. :-)
Got me.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox Count
I'll do the same
I'll take that two liner and make it one... ;-)
(gwmi -namespace root\microsoftexchangev2 -class exchange_mailbox -computer
servername).Count
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hmph. :-)
This one uses PowerShell and sorts the output by Active Directory OU.
Wrappage:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/a-script-f
or-getting-mailbox-sizes-using-wmi-in-powershell.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
And if you also want to know how large each one is, here is a report you can
run:
Wrappage:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/a-script-f
or-getting-mailbox-sizes-using-wmi.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
I don't think it's trivial at all.
Good practice. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox
Cool!
I've never used StartsWith() before. Thanks for pointing it out.
I think that's a pretty PowerShell'ed routine now.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB.
Geodispersion is coming, using Windows Server 2008. Backup is LCR to cheap
disk.
I'm seeing more folks moving away from clustering with LCR and SCR. Good
riddance, in my opinion.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE
If everything has replicated, truly, then you won't lose anything. It will
all backfill.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb690955.aspx - see the
DomainName explanation.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
What's the number? You only get that warning when you are within 20% of the
maximum limit.
You need to figure out what's creating the named properties.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
This almost certainly means that it is creating a custom X-* header. It
shouldn't do that.
To eliminate the properties, you can move a mailbox that contains the
properties to another store.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex
a
store. I've always moved the content and deleted the store. With a PF, you'd
have to replicate it to another server instead of using Move Mailbox.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
worthwhile. I dunno yet.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Pete Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone using CCR in production?
Ive had a CCR
the mailboxes
out of the store with too many properties, you delete the store.
MFCMAPI can show you all the named properties on a store.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22
a vested interest in selling their product. I respect that. They
do provide some value-add with reporting. But that is all that I see. And I
don't approve of their marketing. I personally think that it is misleading.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
that to verify an
incoming message.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Corruptions - redux
Chaps,
On my hunt
of named properties are exhausted, a store will no longer
accept any messages that require the creation of a named property. So.it's
non-optimal.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
defragging the db. Doesnt exchange do that by itself???
Unless they mean an offline defrag which MS even says only if necessary.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GoExchange Response
You may need to look at the physical messages themselves to determine if you
can determine a pattern of corruption.
As another poster said yesterday (I think it was yesterday), it's probably
the A/V software somewhere along the way.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
Do you have a specific question?
DAS can be cheap. If you plan for the I/O load, and good backups, it'll work
just fine.
The replication options, CCR/LCR/SCR - they are great. I wish MSFT had done
that technology years ago.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
You have to answer first - what is the goal? Why are you doing the restore?
Does it impact all users or just one (or a few?).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23
I wouldn't have done it that way, but that should be an ok way. Given what
you've said, I'd take a dump of the crappy hardware and restore it on the
new hardware.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:[EMAIL
You need to look at the message tracking log on party B's exchange server.
If you've copied the SMTP conversation properly, then party B's exchange
server is generating a NDR after reception is complete. The message tracking
log should tell you an error reason why.
Regards,
Michael B
Option 1 is what I would do.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: to RSG or to not RSG
Yeah me too
Yes. All changes up to and including UR5 were in SP1.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Rollup 3 vs. SP1
I'm
are http://certificatesforexchange.com (I am not affiliated.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Tales of woe featuring
That makes me smile.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IPod
He's Micheal.
I'm Michael.
And yes I do.
:-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Assistance
Look on CDOLive. They used to have lots of that kinda stuff.
You are aware that those are synchronous, right?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:57 PM
To: MS
Would you please update the link in that article to:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/verifying-
dns-configurations-using-powershell.aspx
Thanks...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From
And I thought I e-mailed you directly instead of on the list. Sorry about
that...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange
the categorizer. If you aren't a high-volume
e-mail shop (I mean hundreds of e-mails per minute) then it likely isn't a
problem.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:47
That's typical. You need to be able to decode TNEF to understand most
Exchange e-mail messages.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
SSL Explorer is free and easy to use.
But I'm not 100% sure what you mean by front-end security.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: N Parr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 12:25 PM
To: MS
Try using OWA or download them into a PST using POP3.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: View Postmaster
I
,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SMTPReceive Log
Hey all,
I'm having an issue with a newsletter not being delivered. Other
disabled the SNP?
Wrappage:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/01/03/more-issue
s-with-the-windows-server-2003-scalable-networking-pack.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 3913 matches
Mail list logo
