Re: [exim-dev] Bug 2369: single-key lookup type based on libcorkipset

2019-02-24 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev
On 24/02/2019 19:17, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote: > I don't know if a lookup done via the list-syntax > "hosts = corkipset:/filename" > will be different. Probably it will, sigh. Dots, and always seven. I tested by adding "pipeline_advertised_hosts =

Re: [exim-dev] Bug 2369: single-key lookup type based on libcorkipset

2019-02-24 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev
On 24/02/2019 18:52, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote: > On 24/02/2019 18:11, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote: >>> I'd expect conversion to unabbreviated form to have been done too. >> >> Do you mean I can expect an IPv6 address (mapped or not) to have exactly >> 7 separators, whatever these

Re: [exim-dev] Bug 2369: single-key lookup type based on libcorkipset

2019-02-24 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev
On 24/02/2019 18:11, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote: >> I'd expect conversion to unabbreviated form to have been done too. > > Do you mean I can expect an IPv6 address (mapped or not) to have exactly > 7 separators, whatever these might be? If yes, there is no ambiguity. That is my hope. But

Re: [exim-dev] Bug 2369: single-key lookup type based on libcorkipset

2019-02-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev
On 2019-02-24 15:01, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 24/02/2019 07:47, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote: > > > > How are the IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses written in Exim? > > > > The straight translation to dots instead of colons would be ambiguous, > > wouldn't it? Say, ...1.2.3.4 could mean

Re: [exim-dev] Bug 2369: single-key lookup type based on libcorkipset

2019-02-24 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev
On 24/02/2019 07:47, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote: > On 2019-02-10 23:03, Jeremy Harris wrote: > >> If you can reliably detect the ipv6-ness, yes, that sounds like the >> minimally intrusive way. > > How are the IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses written in Exim? > > The straight translation to

Re: [exim-dev] Test suite unusable?

2019-02-24 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev
On 24/02/2019 02:23, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote: > Do you have a suggestion for the version mismatch? Ignore it. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##