On 24/02/2019 19:17, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
> I don't know if a lookup done via the list-syntax
> "hosts = corkipset:/filename"
> will be different. Probably it will, sigh.
Dots, and always seven.
I tested by adding
"pipeline_advertised_hosts = net-corkipset;DIR/aux-var/TEST.ips
On 24/02/2019 18:52, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
> On 24/02/2019 18:11, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote:
>>> I'd expect conversion to unabbreviated form to have been done too.
>>
>> Do you mean I can expect an IPv6 address (mapped or not) to have exactly
>> 7 separators, whatever these might
On 24/02/2019 18:11, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote:
>> I'd expect conversion to unabbreviated form to have been done too.
>
> Do you mean I can expect an IPv6 address (mapped or not) to have exactly
> 7 separators, whatever these might be? If yes, there is no ambiguity.
That is my hope. But
On 2019-02-24 15:01, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 24/02/2019 07:47, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote:
> >
> > How are the IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses written in Exim?
> >
> > The straight translation to dots instead of colons would be ambiguous,
> > wouldn't it? Say, ...1.2.3.4 could mean eith
On 24/02/2019 07:47, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote:
> On 2019-02-10 23:03, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
>> If you can reliably detect the ipv6-ness, yes, that sounds like the
>> minimally intrusive way.
>
> How are the IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses written in Exim?
>
> The straight translation to dots
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev (So 24 Feb 2019 12:08:42 CET):
> On 24/02/2019 02:23, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote:
> > Do you have a suggestion for the version mismatch?
>
> Ignore it.
Seems to be result of changing the version numbering scheme to semantiv
version numbers. I'll fix that in the te
On 24/02/2019 02:23, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-dev wrote:
> Do you have a suggestion for the version mismatch?
Ignore it.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##