On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
Since f2ed27cf5f (between 4.89 & 4.90) we've documented
a requirement on C99-capable compilers. This was the
introduction of specified-initialiser use in the Exim code.
How do people feel about other more-modern C features?
This was
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2358
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Harris ---
It depends how complex you want it; for the simplest case place this class
of messages in an alternate named queue, set up the queue-runner to run M
times per
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019, ? via Exim-dev wrote:
Hello,
the last discussion about PRDR
http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt on ietf-s...@ietf.org
was in
March 2014.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/current/msg07655.html
The question was if PRDR will
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:43:04AM +, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
--- Comment #9 from Phil Pennock ---
IMO yes we're ready to drop support for older OpenSSL. We set a clear policy,
it's over a year (or two?) after that point, and
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2368
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|---
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-dev wrote:
Do the DKIM exim experts subscribe to the mailop list ?
In https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2394 Simon Arlott suggests that the answer is
"no".
In that case (and especially since the links below are on a server
Do the DKIM exim experts subscribe to the mailop list ?
There is an ongoing discussion on the mai...@mailop.org
about a snafu with DKIM which implicates exim and google.
The original report of the snafu (google rejections caused the list to
auto-unsubscribe over a hundred subscribers of the
On Fri, 1 May 2020, Simon Arlott via Exim-dev wrote:
On 2020-04-30 14:31, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
As usual for our run-up to release, new features are still being
accepted at this early stage.
I'm still waiting for my patches for callout messages,
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2648
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Harris ---
This is the sort of thing that static analysis ought to find; we probably have
an uninitialized variable. Unfortunately my ability to build for Coverity has
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2601
--- Comment #2 from marty...@mc2.dev ---
Yes, but why do we trust message body then? Like:
if $message_body matches ""
then
seen finish
endif
The thing I don't get - why is $message_body safer
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2594
Bug ID: 2594
Summary: CNAME handing can break TLS certificate verification
Component: TLS
Assignee: jgh146...@wizmail.org
Reporter:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2671
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Harris ---
I had some hope that dlmopen() might help with the lookup-modules conflict.
But I still can't see a way of getting the combination
- dl{,m}open()'d local_scan code
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021, Jasen Betts via Exim-dev wrote:
I'm wanting to be able to use expansion variables in the servers=
parameter of query-style lookups.
I can use variables if I put servers= inside the query, but if
servers= is used there I can't use tainted variables in the query.
I crawled
On Thu, 6 May 2021, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
As per the documentation
https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-content_scanning_at_acl_time.html#SECTscanmimepart
the option 'decode = $mime_filename' can be used however within the MIME ACL.
This now fails due to the
On Mon, 3 May 2021, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2724
Graeme Fowler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
On 12/09/2021 16:33, Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
The 4.next branch is now expecting the pcre2 library, replacing the
original
pcre library; the latter having gone end-of-life.
Buildfarm animal maintainers, please check that the
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021, Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev wrote:
On 2021-10-02 Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev wrote:
On 02/10/2021 20:00, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Will 4.95.1 (if such happens) use pcre or pcre2 ?
Pcre2. Pcre is dead, as I said.
Hello,
4.95.1 would presumably be a security release.
I guess we should also try to turn the appropriate fake-mail-server
scripts into exim test scripts.
I'd like to see which test shows the vulnerability and your results.
Jeremy, Heiko, is it OK to be discussing this here ?
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, Harry Mills via Exim-dev wrote:
Hi Andrew,
You
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1895
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Harris ---
... content removed as a security precaution ...
This morning I have received two comments on exim bug 1895 via the
exim-dev mailing list, but when I
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022, Harry Mills via Exim-dev wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the swift reply. Here is the (anonymised) output of the test tool
for reference. It looks like exim 4.94.2 (Centos 8) is not vulnerable:
python3 ./command-injection-tester --smtp
As I understand
I was surprised to discover that secur...@exim.org
is a *moderated* list.
Whilst the traffic is low, so the signal-noise ratio may be poor,
I would guess that most list members are also moderators, so the
benefit of moderation is low. Also security issues can be urgent
so the moderation delay
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, Kirill Miazine via Exim-dev wrote:
Beware that the just released RC0 for Exim 4.96 may break your Dovecot
LDA delivery. It did break mine, which is similar to what is described
on https://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Exim
Here is the relevant ChangeLog entry:
JH/25 Taint-check
I have been reading about exim message ids (for enhancement
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956
).
I see that the code has both
src/config.h.defaults:#define MAX_LOCALHOST_NUMBER256
and
src/exim.h-#if BASE_62 == 62
src/exim.h:# define LOCALHOST_MAX 16
src/exim.h-#else
I'm looking for exim logfiles and message headers to test
that the new exim_msgdate utility reports the correct time
for all message ids.
I am particularly looking for logfiles and mail folders
a) from systems that use the localhost_number feature
and b)from non-UK time zones.
I only really
I have noticed that emails from the exim bug system to the exim-dev list
can take well over a day to arrive:
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59430 helo=hummus.exim.org)
by hummus.exim.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2-31-g503e55a2c)
(envelope-from )
id 1pbzJc-00074E-5o
for
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, admin--- via Exim-dev wrote:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2982
Bug ID: 2982
Summary: Writing logs to standard output
Product: Exim
Version: 4.96
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023, exim--- via Exim-dev wrote:
Hi
I am curious as to how exim writes to a users home directory. I have done a
lot of searching and could not find anything specific.
as exim runs as an unprivileged user as far as I can tell it has no rights to
modify a users home folder,
-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2023 13:48, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-dev wrote:
I'm attempting to write CLIENTID support for Exim.
My current attempt is available at
https://www.aitchison.me.uk/exim/clientid.20230325.patch
I am using the exim test suite. Below is the significant part of
runtest -
I'm attempting to write CLIENTID support for Exim.
My current attempt is available at
https://www.aitchison.me.uk/exim/clientid.20230325.patch
I am using the exim test suite. Below is the significant part of
runtest --keep 3752
When I do STARTTLS -> CLIENTID -> NOOP
the CLIENTID gives
30 matches
Mail list logo