Re: [exim-dev] FW: Legacy EHLO AUTH responses (patch) 4.52

2005-12-07 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Andrew Johnson wrote: related to the AUTH= line (which seems to be deprecated now ?!). With help from this list last week, I managed to fix most of my broken users by adding a bogus authenticator to do the AUTH=LOGIN line I needed. This broke some other servers. It seems I need to put the

RE: [exim-dev] FW: Legacy EHLO AUTH responses (patch) 4.52

2005-12-07 Thread Philip Hazel
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Jakob Hirsch wrote: You wrote that the bogus authenticator didn't fix the behaviour, so this wouldn't be a question of elegance. Applying non-trivial patches is far less elegant than a little config change. I suppose I'd better say that I am not in favour of putting what

RE: [exim-dev] FW: Legacy EHLO AUTH responses (patch) 4.52

2005-12-07 Thread Andrew Johnson
From: Jakob Hirsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I understand that, I've been long enough in this business. I just wanted to know with which servers the behaviour described by you happens. Specifically it was older Novell Groupwise servers, though adding the AUTH= line after the AUTH line

RE: [exim-dev] FW: Legacy EHLO AUTH responses (patch) 4.52

2005-12-07 Thread Andrew Johnson
To: Jakob Hirsch Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; exim-dev@exim.org Subject: RE: [exim-dev] FW: Legacy EHLO AUTH responses (patch) 4.52 On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Jakob Hirsch wrote: You wrote that the bogus authenticator didn't fix the behaviour, so this wouldn't be a question of elegance. Applying