W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
But TWX and Telex are no longer a factor, and X.400 not far
behind - outside of a few specialty organizations.
Indeed, I was interested to see that RFC 4450 (Getting Rid of the
Cruft: Report from an Experiment in Identifying and Reclassifying
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Chris Thompson wrote:
W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But TWX and Telex are no longer a factor, and X.400 not far
behind - outside of a few specialty organizations.
Indeed, I was interested to see that RFC 4450 (Getting Rid of the
Cruft: Report from an Experiment
Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK - here's what I want to do. I want to forward a copy of selected
email to another email address, but only if the email address that I
want to forward to is a valid working email address.
Interesting idea.
So - I need to do a callout and check if the
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I want to forward a copy of selected
email to another email address, but only if the email address that I
want to forward to is a valid working email address. So - I need to do a
callout and check if the email address is valid before I forward
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I want to forward a copy of selected email to
another email address, but only if the email address that I want to forward to
is a valid working email address. So - I need to do a callout and check if the
email address is
Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I want to forward a copy of selected email to
another email address, but only if the email address that I want to forward to
is a valid working email address. So - I need to do a callout and check if
Marc Perkel wrote:
*trimmed*
the email address
I need to verify isn't either the sender or the recipient. I need to
verify and arbetrary address that I generate to see if it exists
Pardon my ignorance, but if you are the one who 'generates' it
and it is truly 'arbitrary' then WOGGE would
W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
*trimmed*
the email address
I need to verify isn't either the sender or the recipient. I need to
verify and arbetrary address that I generate to see if it exists
Pardon my ignorance, but if you are the one who 'generates' it and it
is truly
Marc Perkel wrote:
W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
*trimmed*
the email address
I need to verify isn't either the sender or the recipient. I need to
verify and arbetrary address that I generate to see if it exists
Pardon my ignorance, but if you are the one who 'generates' it
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
require verify = recipient/callout
Well - yes, if on the same server
No, callouts work across servers. We use this on the MXs in Cambridge to
verify addresses in departments such as the Computer Lab that run their
own email servers. It also works
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
But - some of my customers are asking to get a copy of the spam I'm
bouncing/black holing. So what I want to do is if I detect spam then I
want to forward a copy of it to another email address, but only if I can
do a forward callout and verify the
Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
require verify = recipient/callout
Well - yes, if on the same server
No, callouts work across servers. We use this on the MXs in Cambridge to
verify addresses in departments such as the Computer Lab that run their
own email
12 matches
Mail list logo
