On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Peter Hutchison via Exim-users wrote:
Where is get domain keys from ?
If you mean the keys for your domain, as Phil said, you generate
yours yourself (and put them in the DNS for others to access)
and read the keys for other domains from the DNS.
(DomainKeys was an
On 06/26/2018 01:27 PM, Peter Hutchison via Exim-users wrote:
> Has anyone implanted DKIM and DMARC on their system.
Yes and no, respectively
> For DKIM did you implement full, partial or optional Digital Signing
Defined how?
> for incoming and/or outgoing messages?
> Have you implemented it
Hi,
Am 26.06.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Andrew Lewis via Exim-users:
>> If it is correct that rspamd (in current versions) not longer operates
>> with Exim then we should cease claiming it does (until and if
>> someone develops new support), and may as well remove the nonfunctional
>> code.
>
>
Andrew Lewis via Exim-users (Di 26 Jun 2018 21:50:31
CEST):
…
> Can we revive Rspamd support please? I expect a non-trivial amount of people
> are actively using it.
I'm more than happy if we can continue (native) rspamd support.
As long as rspamd supports the legacy SpamAssassin-derived
Hi,
I'm sorry about breaking the thread, I was not on the list.
If it is correct that rspamd (in current versions) not longer operates
with Exim then we should cease claiming it does (until and if
someone develops new support), and may as well remove the nonfunctional
code.
That's not
Has anyone implanted DKIM and DMARC on their system.
For DKIM did you implement full, partial or optional Digital Signing for
incoming and/or outgoing messages?
Have you implemented it in an academic institute ?
What about verifying signatures, can you set it to allow unsigned messages
through?
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
> Personally I'd like to see rspamd support in Exim, but currently my
> ressources are limited (ressources hack the support into Exim), and I do
> not feel comfortable with bloating Exim by
Hi,
Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users (Fr 15 Jun 2018 13:51:19
CEST):
> i talk with the rspamd develop, they say this:
>
>
> "In fact, it is Exim who SHOULD drop fucking legacy protocol support. But I
> cannot convince its developers to do that. I have fixed this issue at some
> point in the
