Re: [exim] MySQL - Blocking senders at RCPT time

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:49 PM, wrote: > Hi Maruis, > > I have data like this in the table: > > | 21 | *.date | > | 22 | *.top| > | 23 | *.us | > > Would it still work? For use with

Re: [exim] Rewriting envelope from to header From

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Frank Richter wrote: > My aim is that the envelope from (Return-Path) is set to the header from > (whatever it is) for some of our webservers, where PHP programmers send > email, but don't set the envelope from, so that bounces

Re: [exim] EBL: blacklist for email addresses in Reply-To and message bodies

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Phil Pennock wrote: > Doing predictable lookups based upon the full email address, not just > the domain, is drastically different from a privacy perspective. This > is the sort of thing which is sensitive metadata with reasonable privacy >

Re: [exim] EBL: blacklist for email addresses in Reply-To and message bodies

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Phil Pennock wrote: > There could stand to be some privacy implications discussion too -- > you're sending out, over the wire in unencrypted DNS packets, a > predictable derivation of the Reply-To: header received for every email > from a given

Re: [exim] EBL: blacklist for email addresses in Reply-To and message bodies

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 28/06/17 20:27, Phil Pennock wrote: >> There could stand to be some privacy implications discussion too -- >> you're sending out, over the wire in unencrypted DNS packets, a >> predictable derivation of the Reply-To:

Re: [exim] BCC Filter not working

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Ajay Kajla via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup following exim filter but it's not working, assuming > example.com is my domain and I want any outgoing mail from my server > containing some key-work in BCC should also get

Re: [exim] Changing envelope from address to actual recipient address in forwarded mails

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > soumya tr via Exim-users writes: > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:44 AM, soumya tr > wrote: > > > >> I have a forwarder set. All the outgoing mails relay via a3rd party mail > >>

Re: [exim] Start working with exim config files

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:30 PM, John Smith wrote: >Hello, > Hi! >I started working with Exim a few days ago, so I'm a very very beginner >for now. The question I have is, I think, very easy and the goal of my >question is to get a proper use of Exim's

Re: [exim] Start working with exim config files

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > fwiw, the above is somewhat over-complicated. You don't need to touch > u-e-4-conf.conf or any of the other pre-existing files - simply deploy a > configuration file as /etc/exim4/exim4.conf and that will get

Re: [exim] Fwd: Rate-limit queue-processing per domain

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Charlie Elgholm wrote: > I can not change the way Microsoft, Yahoo, Gmail och others do > business - but I might tweak Exim to play better with their - somewhat > bad - rules. I've given up on that, especially considering that Microsoft's

Re: [exim] debug_print for auth?

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Angelo Chen via Exim-users wrote: > Hi, Hi! > we can use use debug_print in router to dump some variables, but not with > authenticator, any way to dump variables like $sender_address? following is > a log entry, but no way to know what's

Re: [exim] Exim and MySQL with UTF-8 encoding

I don't know if this has any relevance, but please note that the MySQL "utf8" character set is not UTF-8. It's the subset of UTF-8 that consists of up to three-byte UTF-8 glyph. If you have a four-byte UTF-8 glyph, this fails. MySQL failed to fix this issue, and instead introduced another

Re: [exim] Rspamd-Proxy error with exim

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > Personally I'd like to see rspamd support in Exim, but currently my > ressources are limited (ressources hack the support into Exim), and I do > not feel comfortable with bloating Exim by

Re: [exim] Fwd: Rate-limit queue-processing per domain

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Marius Stan <ms...@asesoft.ro> wrote: > > On 10/19/2017 03:40 PM, Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users wrote: >> 1) A way of dealing with MXes rather than recipient domains > > > For 1) I tried something like this a couple of years ago: >

Re: [exim] Bounce Back Envelope From

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Bill Cole via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On 29 Jun 2018, at 15:30, David Cunningham via Exim-users wrote: > > >> I am using a smart host that will not accept emails from <>. >> > > Are you convinced that "smart" is the right word here? I'm quite

Re: [exim] Filter with special characters (!?)

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On 2018-08-22, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users > wrote: > > 2018-08-22 07:48:12 1fsQgL-000554-6N Entrantes y Salientes autenticados > - Cuenta_FROM: - X-Mailer = Microsoft Outlook > Express

Re: [exim] Filter with special characters (!?)

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Emanuel Gonzalez via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Hello, ... > > > ==> I also need to block an issue with the following string: Re: Tu > depósito de $13,710.38 > > ... > > > any ideas? > I think you need to stop placing these special rules

Re: [exim] Filter with special characters (!?)

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Emanuel Gonzalez < emanuel_gonza...@live.com.ar> wrote: > I'm filtering the mail before I get to the antispam, to save resources, I > do not want to analyze an email that I know is junk mail > > > That's pretty minimal for letting SpamAssassin or Sieve do the

Re: [exim] DANE(TA) doesn't work with self signed certificate

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:50 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > > Though Debian may not be in a possible to fix DANE-TA(2) support in > Exim+GnuTLS, > they may of course be able to bring it to the attention of the apporpriate > GnuTLS developers. This is

Re: [exim] DANE(TA) doesn't work with self signed certificate

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:04 PM Klaus Ethgen via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Sure, it is the common debian version and Debian is always linking > against gnutls. > Please, if you have not already done so, file a bug report with Debian, this is a pretty major bug. -- Jan -- ##

Re: [exim] Ratelimit database

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 8:45 AM Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > If "d" is typed at the next prompt, the entire record is deleted. > For all except the retry database, that is the only operation that can be > carried out. This is either out of date, or it's

Re: [exim] Bounce Back Envelope From

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:46:25AM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Bill Cole via Exim-users < > > exim-users@exim.org&

Re: [exim] Throttle sending rates?

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:54 PM Jeremy Harris via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On 29/10/2018 11:29, Rich Lott - Artful Robot via Exim-users wrote: > > I couldn't -for example- find any examples of how to move 0-/N/ > > messages from one queue to the main queue. > > Given there's

Re: [exim] DMARC and ARC in the default configuration?

> 27. des. 2018 kl. 10:36 skrev Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users > : > > > I believe that configuring DKIM signing is pretty standard. There can be a > configuration in the default configure, but it will remain just an example, > and un-activated > because of the process required in

Re: [exim] URL in content mail

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:25 PM Sławomir Dworaczek via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > I have always used clamav but he unfortunately does not recognize viruses > by url. Appointments yes, I can do it With SpamAssassin ("SA" hereafter), make your own rule to e.g. local_url_rules.cf,

Re: [exim] Auth command used when not advertised

> 3. des. 2018 kl. 19:00 skrev Dennis Davis via Exim-users > : > >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Nigel Metheringham via Exim-users wrote: >> >> From: Nigel Metheringham via Exim-users >> To: Russell King >> Cc: exim-users@exim.org >> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:11:36 >> Subject: Re: [exim] Auth

Re: [exim] cut subjects that are too long + delete emojii from subject lines...

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 3:23 PM Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > The problem is that these IMAP clients, then directly write the > subject as a file name, and of course some characters are not allowed > as file name, and some subjects are too long, causing the

Re: [exim] Debian-Bug not stopping exim

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:56 PM Graeme Fowler via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On 6 Feb 2019, at 22:03, Klaus Ethgen via Exim-users > wrote: > > So there was a bug introduced in the last few weeks in start-stop-daemon > > that I have to find a way around. The current situation is

Re: [exim] just been hacked, could be CVE-2019-10149?

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:26 PM Calum Mackay via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Luckily, it looks like the trojans did nothing more than repeated > attempts to open up my ssh server to root logins, which I think (and > hope) didn't actually work, so I may have been lucky, and the

Re: [exim] MTA-STS Solution

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:13 AM Jeff Forsyth via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > I know it's not a popular topic. And there are all sorts of arguments > against MTA-STS. But, it is deployed in the wild and has an active RFC. > > To those who wish to have an RFC 8461 compliant sending

Re: [exim] dovecot_login authenticator failed for (User) [45.125.66.123]: 535 Incorrect authentication data

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:37 PM necktwi via Exim-users wrote: > I have also set > > unix_listener auth-client { > mode = 0660 > user = mail > } > > in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf > > I don't understand why dovecot_login authenticator fails though I have > given the right

Re: [exim] Message rejected due to long Reference: header

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:17 AM Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users > wrote: > > > The 998 limit is for de-folded lines. Go over that and you'd need > > multiple header lines; to do which you'd

Re: [exim] Exim, Dovecot, mdir and hardlinks - a true story

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:34 PM Phil Pennock via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On 2019-08-14 at 12:24 -0400, Phil Pennock via Exim-users wrote: > > On 2019-08-14 at 12:54 +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: > > > Do we need a fast/poor quota method for cases where the

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-15846 ..Exim Vulnerability

>From the Wheezy ELTS package: dpkg-source: info: applying 30_dontoverridecflags.dpatch dpkg-source: info: applying 31_eximmanpage.dpatch dpkg-source: info: applying 32_exim4.dpatch dpkg-source: info: applying 33_eximon.binary.dpatch dpkg-source: info: applying 34_eximstatsmanpage.dpatch

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-15846 ..Exim Vulnerability

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 2:01 AM Jasen Betts via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > On 2019-09-13, Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users wrote: > > From the Wheezy ELTS package: > [...] > > dpkg-source: info: applying > 92_Fix-base64d-buffer-size-CVE-2018-6789.

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-15846: Exim - local or remote attacker can execute programs with root privileges

I've had another variant for years: acl_check_mail: deny message = no HELO given before MAIL command condition = ${if def:sender_helo_name {no}{yes}} delay = 60s The delay is a nice touch, if you have the TCP connections to spare. Jan On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:10 PM Phillip

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-15846: Exim - local or remote attacker can execute programs with root privileges

ers > : > > Hello Jan, > > "delay" means tarpitting, in this context? > > I wonder how efficient that is. > > Sincerely, > Konstantin > >> On 09.09.2019 21:16, Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users wrote: >> I've had another variant for years: >>

Re: [exim] detecting overly frequent smtp from real user

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 2:49 PM Graeme Fowler via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Basic ACL for this (in the RCPT ACL): > The problem with this is that this only deals with SMTP sessions that do an RCPT. Exim lacks a sensible way of having event triggers at the end of a state. -- Jan

Re: [exim] conditional forward, 2nd problem

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:32 PM Lars Schimmer via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I try to route all mails to one specific email address to another email > server. > > I got: > exchange_people: >driver = manualroute >domains = x.y.z >local_parts = user1 >

Re: [exim] Please help me to understand the roles and purposes of an Exim Smarthost

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 6:35 PM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via Exim-users wrote: > > The recipient domain is hosted in the Exchange server. Please read > below for the Exim Smarthost which my boss had configured. I still do > not fully understand the roles and purposes of a smarthost.

Re: [exim] local_domains by dns

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 3:24 PM Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users < exim-users@exim.org> wrote: > > If somebody change MX to other host, he should think also how to handle > multiple mailboxes (hosted on "old" place and on "new" one), > and what to do with already stored mails. > Yes, this is

Re: [exim] local_domains by dns

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:35 PM Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > Am 26.08.21 um 11:38 schrieb Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:57:49AM +0200, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > >> My actual problem is to build the content of local_domains from DNS IN > MX > >> Records.

Re: [exim] Proxy smtp connections to multiple Exim servers behind proxy

> 17. apr. 2023 kl. 14:44 skrev Sebastian Arcus via Exim-users > : > > I couldn't agree more. I am permanently scarred emotionally from installing > and configuring SpamAssassin for the first time - and even after years of > working with it I don't feel like I've managed to tame it :-)