On 2011-08-25 at 07:45 +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 00:50, Frank Elsner frank.els...@tu-berlin.dewrote:
One idea might be to send bounces and only bounces from a different
interface/IP.
This avoids blacklisting of the interface/IP used to send all other
normal
On 25/08/11 2:36 AM, Oliver Howe ojh...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think I should stop sending bounce backs as long as they are
legitimate (if for example somebody made a typing mistake when composing a
message).
But I do want to stop sending bounce backs to messages that didnt come
from
where
-Original Message-
From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On
Behalf Of Craig Whitmore
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:32 AM
To: Oliver Howe; exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at .backscatterer.org
A mail server should not accept
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:36:56 +0100 Oliver Howe wrote:
Hi,
One of my mail servers has been listed at backscatterer.org
They say they can remove me for 92 euros or I will be automatically removed
in 4 weeks.
One idea might be to send bounces and only bounces from a different
interface/IP.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 00:50, Frank Elsner frank.els...@tu-berlin.dewrote:
One idea might be to send bounces and only bounces from a different
interface/IP.
This avoids blacklisting of the interface/IP used to send all other
normal mail.
That is a decent way of mitigating the risks, but I
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Well, the backscatter issue means that we have no choice but to try to do
that. But that's a bad thing. It would be a much better world in which we
were able to accept such messages, and then generate a bounce. Why? Because
bounce
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:51 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
[snip other items for clarity]
I think my hosts are frequently listed, but I've only _once_ noticed it
causing a rejection -- and in that case, the admin of the rejecting mail
server was easily persuaded to stop using backscatterer.org
--On 29 June 2010 10:51:00 +0100 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
n Mon, 2010-06-28 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Well, the backscatter issue means that we have no choice but to try to
do that. But that's a bad thing. It would be a much better world in
which we were able
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 29 June 2010 10:51:00 +0100 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
Users still won't bother to read them, and will prefer to ask a sysadmin
who will have read the words on the user's screen to them, before the
user actually understands.
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:52 +0100, Jethro R Binks wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 29 June 2010 10:51:00 +0100 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
Users still won't bother to read them, and will prefer to ask a sysadmin
who will have read the words on the
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, David Woodhouse wrote:
--On 29 June 2010 10:51:00 +0100 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
Users still won't bother to read them, and will prefer to ask a sysadmin
who will have read the words on the user's screen to them, before the
user
--On 29 June 2010 13:24:28 +0100 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:52 +0100, Jethro R Binks wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 29 June 2010 10:51:00 +0100 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
Users still won't bother to read
- Original Message -
From: Phil Pennock exim-us...@spodhuis.org
To: Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at Backscatterer.org
On 2010-06-28 at 16:43 -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
I have been researching
Is it not possible to have an ACL check for over-quota and reject
at SMTP time? I don't use Quotas myself, so I've not looked into
it.
Potentially difficult if your mailstore is a separate IMAP server,
eg Cyrus, Dovecot. But would you want to do this? Surely
over-quota should be treated
On 2010-06-29 at 16:07 -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
Does the rest of the config look sane to you?
I only skimmed it briefly and am not going to have time for this any
time soon, sorry.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
OK, Thanks Phil :-)
- Original Message -
From: Phil Pennock exim-us...@spodhuis.org
To: Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at Backscatterer.org
On 2010-06-29 at 16:07 -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
Does
--On 25 June 2010 13:56:12 +0100 Ron White exim...@riotm.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:28 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 24 June 2010 09:43:40 + Kebba Foon kebba.f...@qcell.gm wrote:
Backscatterer - Why it is abusive and how to stop your system doing so
Email servers
- Original Message -
From: Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk
To: exim...@riotm.co.uk
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at Backscatterer.org
--On 25 June 2010 13:56:12 +0100 Ron White exim...@riotm.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-25
On 2010-06-28 at 16:43 -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
I have been researching and tinkering to no avail on the backscatter
issue. Trying to make sure I am not the source, or the recipient of
backscatter. backscatterer.org has not helped as occasionally my server have
been listed.
I am
--On 24 June 2010 09:43:40 + Kebba Foon kebba.f...@qcell.gm wrote:
Backscatterer - Why it is abusive and how to stop your system doing so
Email servers should be configured to provide Non-Delivery Reports
(bounces) to local users only.
Unacceptable email from anywhere else should be
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:28 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 24 June 2010 09:43:40 + Kebba Foon kebba.f...@qcell.gm wrote:
Backscatterer - Why it is abusive and how to stop your system doing so
Email servers should be configured to provide Non-Delivery Reports
(bounces) to local
From: Kebba Foon
recently i found out that some of
the ip's i allow relay for are infect and send a lot of mails with fake
sender addresses
The bounces/backscatter is because a lot of these mails is to
nonexistent recipient addresses (spammers' lists contain a lot of
nonexistent addresses).
my mail server has been listed at backscatterer.org, and on their site
they suggested that i should only send bounces to local users but i dont
know how to implement this in exim. recently i found out that some of
the ip's i allow relay for are infect and send a lot of mails with fake
sender
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 09:50 -0500, Matt wrote:
my mail server has been listed at backscatterer.org, and on their site
they suggested that i should only send bounces to local users but i dont
know how to implement this in exim. recently i found out that some of
the ip's i allow relay for
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Ron White wrote:
From: Ron White exim...@riotm.co.uk
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:02:18
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at Backscatterer.org
...
Is it not possible to have an ACL check for over-quota and reject
at SMTP time? I don't use Quotas myself
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 17:54 +0100, Dennis Davis wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Ron White wrote:
From: Ron White exim...@riotm.co.uk
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:02:18
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at Backscatterer.org
...
Is it not possible to have an ACL check
26 matches
Mail list logo
