Re: [Nmh-workers] Cutting a new exmh release...

elease that I'd much rather have that sooner with this restriction than later without. And it sounds like new nmh with old exmh is going to be broken in any event. regards, tom lane ___ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.c

Re: Is anybody still using these features?

a better tool out there ... regards, tom lane ___ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users

Re: Key binding problem

details, but I think somebody explained it on this list, once upon a time.) regards, tom lane ___ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users

Re: Key binding problem

s don't work without that. regards, tom lane ___ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users

Re: Key binding problem

now that you mention it :-(. I'm curious though whether the folk who report not having had any problems did that long ago themselves, or if there is some other mechanism that could sidestep the problem. regards, tom lane ___

Re: How to manage the overwhelming spam issue?

technique. I also use greylist delays, although those delays can be very annoying in some cases, so I wouldn't recommend it unless your spam problem is REALLY bad. regards, tom lane ___ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.co