engage wrote:
>
> chkrootkit displayed the following:
>
> Searching for suspicious files and dirs, it may take a while...
> /usr/lib/libDrakX/auto/Newt/.exists /usr/lib/libDrakX/auto/c/stuff/.exists
>/usr/lib/libDrakX/auto/resize_fat/c_rewritten/.exists /lib/aurora/default/.gtkrc
>/lib/aurora/
On Monday 03 June 2002 05:21 pm, you wrote:
> Oh shit! You should have kept this quiet. I know for sure now you will
> soon be fighting off attacks from all over the world. Just the thought
> of that mpeg has me firing up the old DSNIFF. Lookout, here I come.
>
> drjung
Hehehehehehehe... ;-)
Udo Rader said onto me:
--
|thats why we have our servers under 3meters of concrete and behind
|multiple access-control systems ... unless mcguyver comes along and uses
|his swiss pocketknife to disengage all entrance barriers
On Monday 03 June 2002 01:31 pm, Randy Kramer wrote:
> I know this is somewhat off topic, but do any of you have suggestions on
> how to test a modem / phone line? Please read the following before
> responding.
>
> My problem is that I get a lot of disconnects on my 33 kbps dial up
> line.
>
> Se
All hidden files (starting with a dot) not known to chkrootkit are considered
suspicious. I find lots of .packlist from installing PERL modules.
I don't, but I think I should, run chkrootkit from a readonly medium. Somebody
is going to add a hacked chkrootkit to a root kit sooner or later.
Wou
> I have a friend which is a C++ programmer and he complains a lot about
> the red-root screen.. guess with which user he logs in always...
You should maybe tell him about that...
> That said, we should make it clear that simply stating that "there is a
> new Linux virus" is not hype. People ma
chkrootkit displayed the following:
Searching for suspicious files and dirs, it may take a while...
/usr/lib/libDrakX/auto/Newt/.exists /usr/lib/libDrakX/auto/c/stuff/.exists
/usr/lib/libDrakX/auto/resize_fat/c_rewritten/.exists /lib/aurora/default/.gtkrc
/lib/aurora/default/icons/.xpm /lib/au
On Monday 03 June 2002 06:07 pm, you wrote:
> thats why we have our servers under 3meters of concrete and behind
> multiple access-control systems ... unless mcguyver comes along and uses
> his swiss pocketknife to disengage all entrance barriers ;-))
>
> even on enterprise they still have those b
civileme wrote:
>>
> Well, if we were to build it idiot proof, someone would build a better
> idiot.
>
> The linux virus is a danger to those who download binaries from dubious
> sites. and to all who run as root. Even with our poison red screen and
> autologin to a non-priveleged user
On Monday 03 June 2002 12:04 pm, you wrote:
> hype. As Civileme said (my paraphase), don't run as root, and be
> aware that the closed source binary only apps and drivers you might
> use on a Linux system should be your greater concern. They do taint
> your kernel, Mandrake patched or not.
What
On Monday 03 June 2002 11:39 am, you wrote:
> The only way to prevent this is to turn off the booting from CD in bios and
Of course this wouldn't prevent them from booting from a floppy diskette.
> password protecting bios, but then, with physical access it is trivial to
> kill the bios passwor
I hear good things about Namazu -- see
http://www.namazu.org/doc/tutorial.html#can-not-do.
Randy Kramer
Vincent Danen wrote:
> Does anyone know if such a beast exists? Searching on freshmeat and
> only htdig came up.
>
> I have it running on a box that is running htdig against a bunch of
> mai
Chavdar Videff wrote:
>
> Original Message
>Subject: Re: [expert] running 2 linuxes on a single machine
> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 16:56:35 +0300
> From: Chavdar Videff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> References
On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 15:31:51 -0400 Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem is that I get a lot of disconnects on my 33 kbps dial up
> line.
Hi Randy,
All of Bill's points plus...
- do you have call waiting or other intrusive-notification features?
sure the telco didn't add some
DON"T USE A COMPUTER?!!
SACRILIGE!
We must track down and burn this heretic before other listen to him and
come to their senses!!!
Thousands of SysAdmins with no real-life skills left to wander the
streets?
Imagine the mayhem!
K
Udo Rader wrote:
>
> thats why we have our servers under 3met
On Monday 03 June 2002 10:13 am, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
> >.On Monday 03 June 2002 01:38 am, James wrote:
> >> I've been watching how this thread progressed. I've noticed two pieces
> >> of FUD that keep appearing.
> >>
> >> 1. The assumption that a virus writer wouldn't know that he/she needs to
>
thats why we have our servers under 3meters of concrete and behind
multiple access-control systems ... unless mcguyver comes along and uses
his swiss pocketknife to disengage all entrance barriers ;-))
even on enterprise they still have those bad aliens compromizing their
systems sometimes ...
m
Restoring Bios to defaults its only a matter of opening the Case and in
the mother change a jumper from 1-2 to 2-3... give power to the computer
for 5 seconds and then restoring again to 1-2 the jumper. That's it, in
the mos complicated scenario the thing you have to do is get together
pole + with
Timothy R. Butler wrote:
>Hi everyone,
> I have a friend who is new to Mandrake (but not Linux) and is interested in
>removing supermount. He has tried disabling it in mcc, and that did the trick
>a/f/a the CD-ROM drive, however the diskette drive is still being managed by
>supermount for som
At 11:00 AM 6/3/02, praedor wrote:
>Well? Pray-tell, how does one go about appending a new user to Passwd with
>UID 0? Altering Passwd should itself require root priviledges - I cannot
>even get in to single user mode to do damage without my root passwd. I
>haven't had to do it for a long time
On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 14:08:23 -0700
Ken Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> darklord wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 03 June 2002 11:39 am, you wrote:
> > > And this leads to the simple conclusion that if one has physical
> > > access to a computer, then security is largely out the window.
> > > Any c
On Mon May 27, 2002 at 07:46:42PM +1000, Mark Williamson wrote:
[...]
> > You can base your exim rpm on my own (www.rpmhelp.net), which I think
> > was done for 8.0 or 8.1 (forget which). It hasn't been updated in a
> > while.
> >
> > I think it will resolve this problem. Just taking a peek at
Does anyone know if such a beast exists? Searching on freshmeat and
only htdig came up.
I have it running on a box that is running htdig against a bunch of
mailing list archives and it takes about 16hrs every time to complete
the entire run.
There *has* to be something more efficient than ht://
darklord wrote:
>
>
> Wait! Its my MPEG of Tommy and Heather Locklear during their honeymoon, I'll
> just bet ;-
>
Oh shit! You should have kept this quiet. I know for sure now you will
soon be fighting off attacks from all over the world. Just the thought
of that mpeg has me firing up
hmm, that is strange indeed.
if your floppy is still supermounted (though disabled in fstab), then
what does a plain
% mount
give you?
and what is the content of /etc/fstab & /etc/mtab?
another thing: if you disable supermount in /etc/fstab, you'll have to
umount the devices afterwards as we
darklord wrote:
>
> On Monday 03 June 2002 11:39 am, you wrote:
> > And this leads to the simple conclusion that if one has physical access to
> > a computer, then security is largely out the window. Any clown could come
> > in and bootup with a rescue disk (addressing the linux aspect) and do
>
just to keep it on the list
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
THanks Udo, but those are suggestions that I have already tried.
The CD stops automounting, but the floppy won't. And, I cannot mount
a floppy formatted with ext2, unless I go to root and issue
On Monday 03 June 2002 11:39 am, you wrote:
> And this leads to the simple conclusion that if one has physical access to
> a computer, then security is largely out the window. Any clown could come
> in and bootup with a rescue disk (addressing the linux aspect) and do
> whatever to your drives.
Randy,
Have you noticed any difference the frequency of disconnects based
on weather? E.g., is it any worse after it rains compared to an
extended dry spell? What about time of day? Is it any worse during
the day compared to night time?
Do you use the same phone line for your regular voice phone
I know this is somewhat off topic, but do any of you have suggestions on
how to test a modem / phone line? Please read the following before
responding.
My problem is that I get a lot of disconnects on my 33 kbps dial up
line.
Several months ago, my ISP adopted a new policy -- I won't try to rep
I have a desktop containing a PCI to PCMCIA card with an Orinoco Gold and a
laptop using a Zoomair prism2-based wlan card. I know the Zoomair works fine
as I have successfully used it to connect to various wireless networks. I
have not had the same experience with the Orinoco card, however.
On Monday 03 June 2002 11:13 am, you wrote:
> Just to put my .02 in on that.
> I'm not sure that a trick like that is something that should be broadcast
> on a public list.
Why not? Isn't that how things get fixed?
For instance, if there is a big exploit in Mandrake's patchwork kernel, and
no o
I can't recall if it was discussed recently in this list or not but I would
swear that not too long ago someone mentioned a problem with orinoco cards
and the yenta_socket module. I have an orinoco gold card installed on a
Mandrake 8.2 system, using the wvlan_cs module with the yenta_socket.
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Olle Hallin wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arief Rakhmatsyah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [expert] samba and SWAT and webmin and MCC
>
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From
- Original Message -
From: "Arief Rakhmatsyah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] samba and SWAT and webmin and MCC
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lee Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > I've seen peop
Check the Directory Permissions, I had that on mine as well. Apparently there
is a different user for Apache in 8.2.
faisal gillani wrote:
> Well my alias on apache server present in MDK 8.2 are
> not working .. now even the preconfigured alias ie
> /icons/
>
> acess forbidden message is comin
On Monday 03 June 2002 10:29 am, D. Olson wrote:
> On Monday 03 June 2002 11:13 am, you wrote:
> > Just to put my .02 in on that.
> > I'm not sure that a trick like that is something that should be
> > broadcast on a public list.
>
> Why not? Isn't that how things get fixed?
>
> For instance, if t
Well my alias on apache server present in MDK 8.2 are
not working .. now even the preconfigured alias ie
/icons/
acess forbidden message is coming
what can be wrong ?
=
*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thank you Ray!
That fits the Bill Perfectly!
I guess I was unable to follow the documentation. I did not see the reference
in the man msec page in the man mseclib page.
Might I recommend a little update on the Documentation for the Man Page on
msec?
Ray Warren wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2002 at 9:03,
And this leads to the simple conclusion that if one has physical access to a
computer, then security is largely out the window. Any clown could come in
and bootup with a rescue disk (addressing the linux aspect) and do whatever
to your drives. If they had the time, they could also bring in a
Why not? If there is a security bug hidden somewhere it better be made
public quickly, so somebody is going to fix it and somebody else is
going to validate the fix. And, in the meantime, you will be aware of it
and might decide to take some action.
I don't think anybody wants a microsoft-styl
On 3 Jun 2002 at 9:03, Albert E. Whale wrote:
> At msec 3 & 4 I am continually having to reset the /home/mailman perms
> back to 02775. Does anyone have a suggestion on how I can stop the
> madness? I have already tried the /etc/security/msec/security.conf file
> and have not found a valid se
>.On Monday 03 June 2002 01:38 am, James wrote:
>> I've been watching how this thread progressed. I've noticed two pieces
>> of FUD that keep appearing.
>>
>> 1. The assumption that a virus writer wouldn't know that he/she needs to
>> be root to do real damage and that he/she won't do just that.
On Monday 03 June 2002 01:38 am, James wrote:
> I've been watching how this thread progressed. I've noticed two pieces
> of FUD that keep appearing.
>
> 1. The assumption that a virus writer wouldn't know that he/she needs to
> be root to do real damage and that he/she won't do just that. Don't
Original Message
Subject:
Re: [expert] running 2 linuxes on a single machine
Date:
Mon, 03 Jun 2002 16:56:35 +0300
From:
Chavdar Videff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Jeferson Lopes Zacco am 2002-06-02 um 20:36:32 -0300 :
> > Yes there is... AOL...
>
> AOL? What do you mean by that?
O! thats just nasty...yuck!
--
Mark
a.k.a. daRcmaTTeR
--
"If your wife told you NOT to do it there's pr
darklord wrote:
> Sorry if there are any lawyers in the crowd - I just think there is way too
> much useless litigation in this country... ;-(
Which country would that be? Isn't Mandrake a French source distro?
Isn't this a worldwide mailing list?
--
"It is impossible to rightly govern the wor
So sprach Jeferson Lopes Zacco am 2002-06-02 um 20:36:32 -0300 :
> Yes there is... AOL...
AOL? What do you mean by that?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i
Date sent: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 16:16:24 +0300
From: Chavdar Videff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[expert] running 2 linuxes on a single machine
Well, it is possible to ha
Hi
I tried and installed two different distributions of linux on the same
machine in order to compare them, etc.
The first one was a Mandrake 8.1 and I use its lilo to boot all other
OS. Everything was OK and worked smoothly.
However, I installed a SuSE 7.0 and during the installation process
e
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, darklord wrote:
> On Sunday 02 June 2002 03:12 pm, you wrote:
>
> > But there is the majority of real dumb ppl. I remember a case where a
> > lady in USA won a liability case against a manufacturer of microwave
> > ovens because the manual of the oven did not state explicitel
I'm using LM 8.2 (new install), and running several mailing list. I
have grown to like MailMan, a GNU tool.
At msec 3 & 4 I am continually having to reset the /home/mailman perms
back to 02775. Does anyone have a suggestion on how I can stop the
madness? I have already tried the /etc/security/
On Sunday 02 June 2002 03:12 pm, you wrote:
> But there is the majority of real dumb ppl. I remember a case where a
> lady in USA won a liability case against a manufacturer of microwave
> ovens because the manual of the oven did not state explicitely that you
> must not put your cat in the oven
the desicion, which device is handled by supermount is set - as usually
- in /etc/fstab.
in order to get your floppy working w/o supermount, you should change
the floppy entry:
CUT
/mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy supermount
dev=/dev/fd0,fs=vfat,--,iocharset=iso8859-15,sync,codepa
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002 13:59:48 -0500
"Timothy R. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I have a friend who is new to Mandrake (but not Linux) and is
> interested in
> removing supermount. He has tried disabling it in mcc, and that did
> the trick a/f/a the CD-ROM drive, however th
Hi everyone,
I have a friend who is new to Mandrake (but not Linux) and is interested in
removing supermount. He has tried disabling it in mcc, and that did the trick
a/f/a the CD-ROM drive, however the diskette drive is still being managed by
supermount for some reason. Does anyone have sugg
Hi, i have problem then making shaphot in LVM
i create a shapshot volume with
>lvcreate -L300M -s -n tmp_snapshot /dev/sys/tmp
it succeeds but then i try to mount it i get error:
>mount /dev/sys/tmp_snapshot
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sys/tmp_snapshot,
or too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have KDE 3.0.1 (the /opt version) and LM8.2. Before I go to the KDE
lists I ask here, as there may be a problem with Mandrake per se.
A problemette with 3.0.0 that remains in 3.0.1 is that KDE Control
Centre applications which are supposed to add
Raider wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 21:42, J. Craig Woods wrote:
>
>>Sevatio,
>>
>>I couldn't agree with you more. This is the "Great Secret" that
>>Micro$oft, Symantec, and many other big software companies, work so hard
>>to keep secret. Just consider what they stand to lose, in revenue, if
>>
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002 23:38:05 -0700
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been watching how this thread progressed. I've noticed two pieces
> of FUD that keep appearing.
>
> 1. The assumption that a virus writer wouldn't know that he/she needs to
> be root to do real damage and that he/she won
60 matches
Mail list logo