Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-29 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 03:07 pm, Mark Weaver wrote: > >> anyone know when that one's due out? > > > > Ahem: > > "When it's ready"... > > > > > > I always hated getting that answer! > > > > Ric > > LOL...I had that coming.. :) Not nearly as infuriating as -RSN- ("Real Soon Now"

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-28 Thread Mark Weaver
Tibbetts, Ric wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: Ric Tibbetts wrote: | | | Oh come on! If we can't argue about it, what's the point? | *pokes* Come on! | *sticks his tongue out* Weirdo! | *throws a squeezy stress relieving computer shaped foam thing at you* | Let's argue? Plase? ;)

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-28 Thread Tibbetts, Ric
Mark Weaver wrote: Ric Tibbetts wrote: | | | Oh come on! If we can't argue about it, what's the point? | *pokes* Come on! | *sticks his tongue out* Weirdo! | *throws a squeezy stress relieving computer shaped foam thing at you* | Let's argue? Plase? ;) | | I think 9.1b2 is loo

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-26 Thread Mark Weaver
Ric Tibbetts wrote: | | | Oh come on! If we can't argue about it, what's the point? | *pokes* Come on! | *sticks his tongue out* Weirdo! | *throws a squeezy stress relieving computer shaped foam thing at you* | Let's argue? Plase? ;) | | I think 9.1b2 is looking good :) Azrael, I

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-26 Thread Ric Tibbetts
| | | Oh come on! If we can't argue about it, what's the point? | *pokes* Come on! | *sticks his tongue out* Weirdo! | *throws a squeezy stress relieving computer shaped foam thing at you* | Let's argue? Plase? ;) | | I think 9.1b2 is looking good :) Azrael, I would have to agree wi

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-25 Thread Mark Weaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Azrael wrote: | On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 17:43, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: | |>All; |>I took the opportunity to install 9.1b2 on a PC at home. Just to have a |>look around. My first impression when it came up was: |> |>eeYuck! |> |>Sorry guys, I disliked the lo

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-22 Thread Robert Goshko
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 16:35, Tom Brinkman wrote: > On Wednesday January 22 2003 03:08 pm, Robert Goshko wrote: > > > You can look at my review of the beta: > > > > http://www.goshko.ca/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index > >&req=showcontent&id=4 > > from the URL, > "I also ha

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-22 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday January 22 2003 03:08 pm, Robert Goshko wrote: > You can look at my review of the beta: > > http://www.goshko.ca/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index >&req=showcontent&id=4 from the URL, "I also had problems unmounting removable media (CD-ROM's and floppy's). The system w

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-22 Thread Robert Goshko
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:43, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > All; > I took the opportunity to install 9.1b2 on a PC at home. Just to have a > look around. My first impression when it came up was: > > eeYuck! It's not too bad, I run Keramik on 9.0 (KDE 3.0.3) as I like the layout, I use custom bac

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-22 Thread Damian Gatabria
> I think 9.1b2 is looking good :) I think the default looks of kde3.1 (that's pretty much what 9.1 is going to ship with, right? I've got KDE3.1 RC5 here and it looks really close to Mandrake9.1b2 screenshots i've seen) are a bit too bright for my taste, but hey, if it was my call, there would

Re: [expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-22 Thread Azrael
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 17:43, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > All; > I took the opportunity to install 9.1b2 on a PC at home. Just to have a > look around. My first impression when it came up was: > > eeYuck! > > Sorry guys, I disliked the look so much, I took it off. > IMHO... It's over the top on eye-ca

[expert] 9.1b2 observation/opinioin

2003-01-22 Thread Tibbetts, Ric
All; I took the opportunity to install 9.1b2 on a PC at home. Just to have a look around. My first impression when it came up was: eeYuck! Sorry guys, I disliked the look so much, I took it off. IMHO... It's over the top on eye-candy, and severly lacking in content. Ok, it's a beta.. I understan