Somebody scribbled about [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin
These are tricky html or other type of spam, they are plain text.
Generally they are viagra messages. The one that really galls me is
one that uses the name [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the
actual
Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me. I have the latest spamassassin. It is running
in daemon mode. I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is
identified as spam. I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
If you have not setup a filter in procmail, here is what mine looks
like:
## File all spam mail
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
SPAM
This is catching 98% of all spam received. I would not suggest sending
spam to /dev/null, by sending it to a folder you have the ability to
make sure spammassassin does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me. I have the latest spamassassin. It is running
in daemon mode. I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is
identified as spam. I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
identify certain messages as
These are tricky html or other type of spam, they are plain text.
Generally
they are viagra messages. The one that really galls me is one that uses
the
name [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the actual proper
spelling.
Nonetheless, this shouldn't matter...or so one would
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:27:12 -0500
Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me. I have the latest spamassassin. It is
running in daemon mode. I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything
try joining the spamassassin user's list and asking about tuning.
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 11:27, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me. I have the latest spamassassin. It is running
in daemon mode. I have procmail setup to
On Nov 10, 2003, at 13:27, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me. I have the latest spamassassin. It is
running
in daemon mode. I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is
identified as spam. I have trained the Bayesian
On Monday 10 November 2003 02:27 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
OK, this really irritates me. I have the latest spamassassin. It is
running in daemon mode. I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that
is identified as spam. I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
identify
