On Saturday 14 December 2002 8:46 pm, Ralph De Witt wrote:
I snagged the latest NVIDIA drivers in rpm format and tryed to
install following the directions. From level 3 I installed the up
kernel rpm doing a rpm -Uvh, I then did a rpm -e to remove the old
GLX file and then did a rpm - -Uvh to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 15 December 2002 03:47 pm, s wrote:
double check your Config-4 file that it has nvidia as the driver under
device section and Load GLX under module section. Then: modprobe
nvidia (the driver has changed from NVdriver to nvidia). And
On Sunday 15 December 2002 7:34 pm, you wrote:
On Sunday 15 December 2002 03:47 pm, s wrote:
double check your Config-4 file that it has nvidia as the driver
under device section and Load GLX under module section. Then:
modprobe nvidia (the driver has changed from NVdriver to
nvidia).
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:34:38 -0800, you wrote:
What I do not understand is if etc/modules should say nvidia and not NVdriver
and the XF86Config-4 Module should say Load GLX and it points to the
libglx.so file why does it appear to work and yet not work when the new rpms
are installed. Should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 15 December 2002 06:07 pm, s wrote:
On Sunday 15 December 2002 7:34 pm, you wrote:
On Sunday 15 December 2002 03:47 pm, s wrote:
double check your Config-4 file that it has nvidia as the driver
under device section and Load GLX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HI:
I snagged the latest NVIDIA drivers in rpm format and tryed to install
following the directions. From level 3 I installed the up kernel rpm doing a
rpm -Uvh, I then did a rpm -e to remove the old GLX file and then did a rpm
- -Uvh to install
