-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:06 pm, John McQuillen wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
snip
Well, all is well with the system now but I will still need a new mobo to
take advantage of the CPU. I have finally figured out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 02:15 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:06 pm, John McQuillen wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
snip
[...]
This board wont even handle what the MSI sites say it will.
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 00:15, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:06 pm, John McQuillen wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
snip
Well, all is well with the system now but I will still need a new
Praedor,
You might try taking out the sound card, and seeing if you can resolve the
problems. I'm still thinking the power supply is a possible culprit.
Which bios have you flashed to?
Robert
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 17:29, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 00:15, Praedor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 05:45 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
Praedor,
You might try taking out the sound card, and seeing if you can resolve the
problems. I'm still thinking the power supply is a possible culprit.
Which bios have you flashed to?
I
If you only had a generic 250w PS, I'll bet that's it. I've had post problems
on two boxes, on several boards, and that was the problem. It's preety common
when you try to upgrade a board AND cpu with an older box. But if you are
still having problems with a 350w, you should check the actual
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 17:18, Robert Crawford wrote:
If you only had a generic 250w PS, I'll bet that's it. I've had post problems
on two boxes, on several boards, and that was the problem. It's preety common
when you try to upgrade a board AND cpu with an older box. But if you are
still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 11:35 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
Since you have a 2700+, and the chart says 2600+ is the max, you might drop
the multiplier to 15, and increase the FSB until it approaches the 2700+
rating.
Even if you couldn't reach it
Praedor,
Is the bios set to auto detect? Another thought is you might have a weaker
power supply than is needed- I ran into that a few times with new cpus. I
don't think the kernel would cause your problem- it has to be a hardware
configuration/bios setting. What bios did you say you flashed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 09:27 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
Larry Sword wrote:
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 10:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 09:27 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
Larry Sword wrote:
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
snip
Well, all is well with the system now but I will still need a new mobo to take
advantage of the CPU. I have finally figured out the trick to overclocking
the system and have found that this board will simply not do an FSB of 133
Praedor,
The kt3 ultra with via kt333 chipset should do 133Mhz FSB (266) with no
problem. What is your cpu voltage set at? Also, like I mentioned, your power
supply might be marginal- especially on the 3v and 5v lines. John's point on
another older card causing this is valid too, but then your
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI KT333 ultra and the manual says
it can do a 200MHz FSB, etc, which would support the
chip but...in any
Maybe:
Your kernel is using modules for the 'old' mobo and cpu. While booting,
auto-hardware-detect changes the settings for another mobo, but it's not
installed so the modules are not found.
If that's more or less right, you can try to recompile your kernel ?
Steven
(just a wild guess... But I
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI KT333 ultra and the manual says
it can do a 200MHz FSB, etc, which would support
Larry Sword wrote:
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI KT333 ultra and the manual says
it can do a 200MHz FSB, etc,
On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
Larry Sword wrote:
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 09:27 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
Larry Sword wrote:
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except
Praedor,
H.. I thought with a bios upgrade you could run faster cpus on the kt333
Ultra. The 5.7 bios for the Ultra 2, which I have one of supposedly supports
XP 3000+. Yours is just the plain Ultra, correct? If so, I just looked at
this page, and looks like you are in good shape for much
20 matches
Mail list logo
