On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, simon wrote:
Has anyone noticed how netscape 474 gradually consumes cpu usage to 100
percent over 12 to 18 hours?
Netscape does that occassionally, I personally use "Links" and "Lynx" more
often, as they crash less. You can "limit" the amount of CPU/mem Netscape
takes
ED]; "Greg Stewart" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474
It is free for the registering at the sun site...version 5.2
not in Beta anymore.
since what date exactly?
Bambi
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Greg S
I have them both installed, and SO will
NOT find either one, even if I point to it
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Skwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:16:26PM -0400
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:52:56AM -0400, Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS wrote:
I have them both installed, and SO will
NOT find either one, even if I point to it
Well, that's the way it worked for me at least.
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com
Sichere Mail?
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote:
Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why
anyone would expect anything better. Personally, I still like version 3.04
best. I run it with Java disabled; use its old emailer and scripting turned
off. Since I rarely accept
I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA
installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've
done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it
wants. Got a package name and a download URL?
Thanks,
Rob Benson
Ken Thompson wrote:
On Sun,
If you find out let me know,
During the install, I pointed it to my
IBM Java, and it wont see it! Oh well
-Original Message-
From: Rob Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474
I use Staroffice
Submitted 24-Jul-00 by Rob Benson:
I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA
installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've
done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it
wants. Got a package name and a download URL?
Thanks,
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Benson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA
installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've
done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it
wants. Got a package
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote:
I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA
installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've
done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it
wants. Got a package name and a download URL?
The JRE from
go to www.sun.com and download JAVA SDK1.2.2.. thast the latest they have
for linux.
-sarang
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 07:15:46PM -0500, Ellick Chan wrote:
I found a quick cheap way to avoid Netscape, try using lynx, or "links",
an improved lynx. If you do the file associations in links, you can even
view the jpegs and gifs on web pages.
Try out w3m. It really kicks lynx!
Alexander
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 08:16:22PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
Did they fix the java problem in 4.74, or does it still runaway with the
CPU now and then like 4.73 does?
What about Netscape 4.74? Will it be included in the standard distribution,
or will the users have to download it from the
Try the SUN website, although I think it's a development package and is not free.
Check freshmeat.net to see if there are any free Java engines (i have no idea--i don't
use it).
--Greg
I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA
installed. What package would I install
It is free for the registering at the sun site...version 5.2
not in Beta anymore.
Bambi
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Greg Stewart wrote:
Try the SUN website, although I think it's a development package and is not free.
Check freshmeat.net to see if there are any free Java engines (i have no idea--i
- Original Message -
From: "Fran Parker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Greg Stewart" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474
It is free for the registering at the sun site...vers
I wouldn't become too hopeful cause the beta release of Netscape 6 is
doing the same thing. In SPADES. It's worse there than in the .7x series
of Netscape 4.
--
Mark
** Registered Linux user # 182496 **
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, dallard wrote:
Mark
I installed
Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why
anyone would expect anything better. Personally, I still like version 3.04
best. I run it with Java disabled; use its old emailer and scripting turned
off. Since I rarely accept attachments, I've effectively eliminated most
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Pj wrote:
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 17:23:08 -0500
From: Pj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] netscape 474
Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why
anyone would expect anything
Forgive me if this is repeated...I have had to re-write it three times, then
kill KMail because it was stuck and wouldn't send.
I wouldn't look for StarOffice to be the Netscrappy browser/email salvation.
It is the most hoggy, bloated and beautiful suite ever.
You must load their desktop
/23/00, 3:23:08 PM, Pj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re:
[expert] netscape 474:
Considering this browser's sad history the past 3 years I do not know why
anyone would expect anything better. Personally, I still like version
3.04
best. I run it with Java disabled; use its old emailer
Mark
I installed netscape 4.74 on my mandrake 7.0 machine yesterday. It
seems to have the same problems that 4.70 had (my previous version).
Netscape crashes on certain java pages and sometimes takes up al l the cpu.
same as before. Oh well mabe next patch. :0)
Hope that helps
Did they fix the java problem in 4.74, or does it still runaway with the
CPU now and then like 4.73 does?
--
Mark
** Registered Linux user # 182496 **
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, victor gvirtsman wrote:
found it today at ftp.netscape.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
