On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:51, Jack Coates wrote:
> you'll need to make or find a rescue disk that understands software RAID
> -- look at tomsrtbt and LEAF/oxygen. Actually, I bet the Knoppix CD
> would help.
>
> In theory one of the disks is primary and if you mount that disk
> separately (via /dev
you'll need to make or find a rescue disk that understands software RAID
-- look at tomsrtbt and LEAF/oxygen. Actually, I bet the Knoppix CD
would help.
In theory one of the disks is primary and if you mount that disk
separately (via /dev/hda instead of /ded/md0, for instance) the changes
you make
Nikos,
Even better, you can use some live CD distros like Knoppix or Linux
BBC. BBC is far smaller than knoppix and fits on business card CD's.
Knoppix is a full X-enabled linux that allows you to mount local
partitions on the disk drives. These allow you to boot linux up on any
PC with a CDROM
Nikos Papadopoulos wrote:
I use Mandrake 8.2 and I have forgotten the root password or someone changed
boot from floppy, enter 'linux init 1', to single user mode, remove root
password from shadow file. reboot system, 'init 3', enter new password
for root.
hth.
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
thin
you can take that HHD and connect it to another machine running linux and mount it so
you got access to the passwd and shadow file( just empty the encrypted pwd in those
files) then u can connect with no passwd as root and don't forget to change it later
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
I use Mandrake 8.2 and I have forgotten the root password or someone changed
it. I tried to boot in single user mode, mount the disk and reset the
password from the shadow and passwd files, but there are two HDD with
software mirroring enabled and I could not mount the disk. What can I do in
order
Anyways .. you can secure lilo by adding the following to lilo.conf
restricted
password=
Ofcourse you should run lilo afterwards on the command line and change
lilo.conf to read write only for root.
Aj
Two Pence worth :)
On Monday 19 February 2001 5:09 am, you wrote:
> ** Reply to m
hi all, maybe this a too basic question
to put in this area, but here it goes:
i installed mandrake 7.2 on a system
with monochrome display (60Hz only)
and had to launch install using text-based
interface. everything goes fine until
it asks for root password, which nicely
accepts, but never valida
Hi there,
Erm, before this gets out of hand - there's a perfectly logical reason that you
can easily, with physical access to the machine, get root access without a
password. That reason is because you already have physical access to the disk so
you could easily boot your own system and mount the
** Reply to message from Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001
22:14:34 -0500
> Bill,
>
> I would have to agree. I can't believe it would be THAT easy to get into
> even one's own machine so easily when the root user's password has been
> forgotten. Seems to me that's an incredibl
Bill Piety wrote:
>
> What a scary thread this is. I never realized it could be so easy to
> take control of someone's Linux box. Or did I miss a key element of the
> discussion? Why even have a password at all?
Bill,
I would have to agree. I can't believe it would be THAT easy to get into
even
And CMOS password can be disabled by removing the battery for about 15
minutes, or plugging in a jumper on the motherboard.
you can also use tom's root boot (www.toms.net) to boot a floppy version
of linux and get to your hard drive.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Altoine B. wrote:
> Bill Piety wr
Bill Piety wrote:
>
> What a scary thread this is. I never realized it could be so easy to
> take control of someone's Linux box. Or did I miss a key element of the
> discussion? Why even have a password at all?
>
Bill, you have to be physically at that machine AND you have to NOT have
the CMOS
Bill Piety wrote:
>
> What a scary thread this is. I never realized it could be so easy to
> take control of someone's Linux box. Or did I miss a key element of the
> discussion? Why even have a password at all?
I don't know about you, but I don't allow random strangers physical
access to my mac
d work fine too, it will overwrite the one that is there now,, that
> > I did many times in RH6.2 also.
> >
> >
> > hope this helps.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of St
** Reply to message from Bill Piety <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001
11:57:37 -0600
> What a scary thread this is. I never realized it could be so easy to
> take control of someone's Linux box. Or did I miss a key element of the
> discussion? Why even have a password at all?
To perform t
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Piety
Sent: Monday, 19 February 2001 1:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [expert] Root Password
What a scary thread this is. I never realized it could be so easy to
take control of someone's Linux box. O
u do have to be in linux-single to do the below by the way ,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Franki
Sent: Monday, 19 February 2001 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [expert] Root Password
actually, just going in and
Stephen Carville
> Sent: Monday, 19 February 2001 1:28 AM
> To: Mandrake Expert
> Subject: Re: [expert] Root Password
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, John J. LeMay Jr. wrote:
>
> - ** Reply to message from Kuldeep Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18
> Feb
> - 2001
Of Stephen Carville
Sent: Monday, 19 February 2001 1:28 AM
To: Mandrake Expert
Subject: Re: [expert] Root Password
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, John J. LeMay Jr. wrote:
- ** Reply to message from Kuldeep Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18
Feb
- 2001 15:10:09 +0530
-
-
- > I forgot the pas
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, John J. LeMay Jr. wrote:
- ** Reply to message from Kuldeep Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Feb
- 2001 15:10:09 +0530
-
-
- > I forgot the password of root
-
- I haven't tried this, but I think you can delete the password from /etc/shadow
- (assuming you are using shad
:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Root Password
** Reply to message from Franki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001
23:26:33 +0800
> can't you just log in as single user and give a new pass word? it used to
> work in RedHAt 6.2
Where did you put the new
** Reply to message from Franki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Feb 2001
23:26:33 +0800
> can't you just log in as single user and give a new pass word? it used to
> work in RedHAt 6.2
Where did you put the new password in RH6.2? /etc/password or /etc/shadow? The
passwords in /etc/shadow are enc
Start you PC with a bootdisk/CD. Mount your root password and edit
/etc/shadow. Delete the encrypted password for root. Reboot the machine
the usual way en login as root and leave the password blank. Should
work.
Kuldeep Shah wrote:
> I forgot the password of root. Now It is possible to change t
can't you just log in as single user and give a new pass word? it used to
work in RedHAt 6.2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John J. LeMay Jr.
Sent: Sunday, 18 February 2001 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert]
** Reply to message from Kuldeep Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 18 Feb
2001 15:10:09 +0530
> I forgot the password of root
I haven't tried this, but I think you can delete the password from /etc/shadow
(assuming you are using shadow passwords) and root will need to enter a new
password next t
I forgot the password of root. Now It is
possible to change the password of root ? if it is possible, then please do let
me know.
Thanking You.
- Kuldeep
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BillK wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > So sprach John Wittkamper am Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:42:56AM -0800:
> > > Not only that, the new stuff should be at the TOP of the reply
> > > rather than the bottom. For the few that need context, it is there,
Why do you assume few need it?
> > And
So sprach Philomena am Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 02:27:53PM -0500:
> This is very deja-vu - didn't we go thru all this about how and where to
> quote not too long ago ? Or was it on the newbie list ? Either way, it was
> off topic then and is now. Can you give it a rest ?
No, it was cooker, I think.
I disagree, put the new text at the top - or see your message end up in
trash - most of the time I cant bother scrolling down unless its
something I am really interested in, and unless there is enough test
within view, how do I know - the subject line is generally too little
info? Same deal with
This is very deja-vu - didn't we go thru all this about how and where to
quote not too long ago ? Or was it on the newbie list ? Either way, it was
off topic then and is now. Can you give it a rest ?
philomena
At 04:34 PM 11/3/2000 +0100, you wrote:
>So sprach John Wittkamper am Thu, Nov 02, 2
> > Not only that, the new stuff should be at the TOP of the reply
> > rather than the bottom. For the few that need context, it is there,
>
> And wrong again. The new stuff should be right below what you are quoting,
> so that the references are as clear as can be.
I'm glad you've got this all
So sprach John Wittkamper am Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:42:56AM -0800:
> Not only that, the new stuff should be at the TOP of the reply
> rather than the bottom. For the few that need context, it is there,
And wrong again. The new stuff should be right below what you are quoting,
so that the refere
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] root password
> So sprach rharvey am Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:37:20PM -0600:
> > that is not true! a person that missed the full letter will not know
what
> > is
So sprach rharvey am Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:37:20PM -0600:
> that is not true! a person that missed the full letter will not know what
> is being talked about and thus assume the questions and that can be bad.
> you can jump to what you want to read or read all of it.that is the
> purpose of
ander Skwar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] root password
> So sprach rharvey am Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 10:28:51PM -0600:
> > where is the file located on a standard install?
>
> passwd
Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Ronnie Whipp am Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 07:01:52PM +:
> > My problem is that, having had to reinstall w98, I cant get grub back;
> > DrakConf put in LILO instead -- any suggestions
>
> as root run sh /boot/grub/install.sh to install grub again.
>
> Alexander Sk
Greg Stewart wrote:
>
> I did forget (and had to be reminded by a friend) that in addition to group
> root, the user should belong to group wheel. And, apparently this does not
> automatically make the user "equal" to root, but gives most root
> priveledges.
To be root, all you need is a uid =
So sprach Ronnie Whipp am Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 07:01:52PM +:
> My problem is that, having had to reinstall w98, I cant get grub back;
> DrakConf put in LILO instead -- any suggestions
as root run sh /boot/grub/install.sh to install grub again.
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.d
So sprach rharvey am Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 05:54:45PM -0600:
> how do you setup a second user to have the same access as root
> a user that will be able to change root password.
Don't know, but here's yet another solution:
Install all the openssh packages, run ssh-keygen as a normal user, copy th
So sprach rharvey am Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 10:28:51PM -0600:
> where is the file located on a standard install?
passwd? /etc/passwd
PS: Please don't do fullquotes! They add nothing, and are just a waste.
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp
Well I will answer that one. You have two choices :
Boot into single user mode.
Or download Tom's RTBt disk.
At 10:54 AM 10/30/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>Greg Stewart wrote:
>>
>> Since I'm used to using linuxconf, that's how I'll explain it...
>>
>> In User Account|Normal|User Accounts add
Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> You don't actually need this in linux. Next time you are booting, try
> "linux single" instead of "linux" if you are using LILO (it's a bitmore
> complicated than that in Grub).
It's easy with Grub as well: when the install screen asks for you to
edit the selection clic
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Buchan Milne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] root password
> You don't actually need this in linux. Next time you are booting, try
> "l
You don't actually need this in linux. Next time you are booting, try
"linux single" instead of "linux" if you are using LILO (it's a bitmore
complicated than that in Grub).
YOu will see you get booted into a root shell without being asked for a
password.
It is a security risk if anyone is going
I did forget (and had to be reminded by a friend) that in addition to group
root, the user should belong to group wheel. And, apparently this does not
automatically make the user "equal" to root, but gives most root
priveledges.
As well, if the linux "root" account gets "screwed", as it can in
Wi
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 29-Oct-00 18:07:05 Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > how do you setup a second user to have the same access as root
> > a user that will be able to change root password.
> > In novell that is one of the
Greg Stewart wrote:
>
> Since I'm used to using linuxconf, that's how I'll explain it...
>
> In User Account|Normal|User Accounts add or select the user you want to have
> root priveledges, and add that user to the root group You may be prompted to
> correct the user's ~/home directory permiss
> that does not make the user truly the same as root.
> at lest it did not on my system
In what way doesn't it do this? Providing information is a great way to
get some :-)
Cheers --- Larry
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
t; - Original Message -
> From: "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 6:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [expert] root password
>
> > Since I'm used to using linuxconf, that's how I'll ex
where is the file located on a standard install?
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Expert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] root password
>
> > how do you setup
that does not make the user truly the same as root.
at lest it did not on my system
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] root password
> Since I&
> how do you setup a second user to have the same access as root
> a user that will be able to change root password.
> In novell that is one of the first things we were taught was to have 2 admin
> accounts so you wont get locked out of your system.
You just give that user a "0" in the password
Since I'm used to using linuxconf, that's how I'll explain it...
In User Account|Normal|User Accounts add or select the user you want to have
root priveledges, and add that user to the root group You may be prompted to
correct the user's ~/home directory permissions if they were initially
created
In a message dated 29-Oct-00 18:07:05 Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> how do you setup a second user to have the same access as root
> a user that will be able to change root password.
> In novell that is one of the first things we were taught was to have 2 admin
> account
how do you setup a second user to have the same access as root
a user that will be able to change root password.
In novell that is one of the first things we were taught was to have 2 admin
accounts so you wont get locked out of your system.
Thanks
Robert
Keep in touch with http://mandrakefor
Well, if you won't log on as root from remote, i suggest
-
#cat /etc/securetty
tty1
tty2
tty3
tty4
tty5
tty6
-
Now you can log on as root only from local consoles !!
> it means you kill yourself. Off course that is very unsecure, cause
> youcan login a
it means you kill yourself. Off course that is very unsecure, cause you
can login as root from remote.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, LINUX_1 wrote:
> Perhaps you have an empty /etc/securetty ???
> deleting your /etc/securetty you'll be able to log on as root from
> everywhere
>
> > I have 2 machine
this usually happen when you choose high security install.
in this type you're not allow to login as root in your console, but you
have to login as user and the su.
try medium security.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> I have 2 machines running Mandrake 7.0, one of which refu
man login
man securetty.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, kf wrote:
>
> Are you trying to log in as root remotely? If so, this is disallowed by
> default on many Unixen as a security hole. Can't remember just now which
> file it is you need to edit. Anybody?
>
> kf
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Declan Moria
Are you trying to log in as root remotely? If so, this is disallowed by
default on many Unixen as a security hole. Can't remember just now which
file it is you need to edit. Anybody?
kf
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Declan Moriarty wrote:
= I have 2 machines running Mandrake 7.0, one of which r
Perhaps you have an empty /etc/securetty ???
deleting your /etc/securetty you'll be able to log on as root from
everywhere
> I have 2 machines running Mandrake 7.0, one of which refuses to
> allow a
> login as root. Any password, even the correct one, is "Incorrect".
> You have to
> log
Sounds like you set security to too high. You cannot login
as root. Only as a user then su.
At 08:53 AM 8/4/2000 +, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> I have 2 machines running Mandrake 7.0, one of which refuses to
> allow a
>login as root. Any password, even the correct one, is "Incorrect". Y
> I have 2 machines running Mandrake 7.0, one of which refuses
to allow a
>login as root. Any password, even the correct one, is "Incorrect".
You have to
>log in as a user, then su to root. This woks reliably.
>
> The machine in question is an AM
I have 2 machines running Mandrake 7.0, one of which refuses to allow a
login as root. Any password, even the correct one, is "Incorrect". You have to
log in as a user, then su to root. This woks reliably.
The machine in question is an AMD K6/2-350, 64MB of ram, 4.3 Gig for
linux.
OK, here is the answer from my KDE oracle .-)
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Denis Havlik wrote:
>:>>Daj vidi o cemu se radi I moze li se kde-screensaver podesiti tako da
>:>>dopusta "otkljucavanje" sa root passwordom.
>:>
>:>Ne moze koliko ja znam. Ne sjecam se koji su bili razlo
>:>The root user should ALWAYS have access, especially to the console. This
is probably
>I am not so sure about this. Imagine someone who is using cryptographic
>file-system, or ssh-agent. Or sipmly someone who has a bunch of naked
>women as background .-)
>
>He certainly does not like the idea o
:>The root user should ALWAYS have access, especially to the console. This is probably
I am not so sure about this. Imagine someone who is using cryptographic
file-system, or ssh-agent. Or sipmly someone who has a bunch of naked
women as background .-)
He certainly does not like the idea of roo
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Darren Eckhoff wrote:
-The root user should ALWAYS have access, especially to the console. This is probably
-and oversight of the KDE people, because it does work in CDE. Killing the X server
-will get you in but seems extreme for just getting past a screen saver ("I sure
-h
The root user should ALWAYS have access, especially to the console. This is probably
and oversight of the KDE people, because it does work in CDE. Killing the X server
will get you in but seems extreme for just getting past a screen saver ("I sure
hope Johnny saved his work!"). Another way you
:~>> And what about the cases, where a user blocks a computer by locking it´s
:~>> screensaver and disappearing into a 2 hour long break? It would be wonderful
:~>> if the superuser could unlock the screen and log out the user in such
:~>> cases... Especially if you are in a educational surroundin
I've seen such a thing being done in UNIX (the administrator 'unlocked' a
workstation using some kind of super-user password) so I'm sure it can be
done in Linux as well. Sorry but don't know how. I wonder if this is at all
related to shadow passwords?
Rui
> -Original Message-
> From: K
Karsten Roemling wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:25:04AM -0500, John kofinas wrote:
> >
> > When you lock your monitor while as a user you, use the users password to
> > unlock it. Secondly to disable the screen saver you can go to settings,
>
> And what about the cases, where a user blocks a
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:25:04AM -0500, John kofinas wrote:
>
> When you lock your monitor while as a user you, use the users password to
> unlock it. Secondly to disable the screen saver you can go to settings,
And what about the cases, where a user blocks a computer by locking it´s
screensav
Stephen Carville wrote:
> Recently I discovered that the root password does not unlock my
> KDE screen if I lock it as a user. I figure there must be a setting I
> missed somewhere but , swelp em. I cannot find it. Anyone know where
> I enable this feature?
>
> --
> Stephen Carville
When you l
Recently I discovered that the root password does not unlock my
KDE screen if I lock it as a user. I figure there must be a setting I
missed somewhere but , swelp em. I cannot find it. Anyone know where
I enable this feature?
--
Stephen Carville
-
76 matches
Mail list logo