On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jon Harper jon.harpe...@gmail.com wrote:
A workaround to this problem is to use factor's online documentation
docs.factorcode.org, which has all the vocabularies loaded.But this
requires an Internet connection and the factor ui looks better.
Another workaround
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Alex A. Naanou alex.na...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, still on the documentation topic, a type/object registry or
tagging of entities in the library/docs would also be a boost in
productivity.right now, it is simpler to find a correct
interface/protocol than a
While we're on the subject
Just pulled down the factor bits from git, and had a problem running the
boot image--it fails in the basis/debugger section. Being the complete
n00b to Factor, I have really no idea what's causing it. Comparing it
against the same files from the binary drop, it
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:26, Chris Double chris.dou...@double.co.nz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Alex A. Naanou alex.na...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, still on the documentation topic, a type/object registry or
tagging of entities in the library/docs would also be a boost in
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 17:11, Keith Lazuka klaz...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I think the documentation is more than
sufficient. I only started working with Factor at the beginning of
this month and had no prior experience with a stack-based language.
Less than a month later, I am
For what it's worth, I think the documentation is more than
sufficient. I only started working with Factor at the beginning of
this month and had no prior experience with a stack-based language.
Less than a month later, I am able to contribute improvements and new
features.
Documentation can only
Make sure you have the latest sources and the latest boot image, and try again.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Ted Neward t...@tedneward.com wrote:
While we're on the subject
Just pulled down the factor bits from git, and had a problem running the
boot image--it fails in the
Dan,
I've made the cleanups you suggested to sequences.extras and combined them with
the core sequences vocab. The reduce* word, by the way, only exists to give
normal reduce a static stack effect.
My git repo*, however, also contains some larger changes to the UI framework:
I've replaced the
Keith,
You are a special case, I have been here for about three months and I am
still confused. I can't tell my left from my right! I may say that the fault
is mine, because I have not given Factor my time . I have tried other
strange languages in the past and I must say that I had the same
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:57:07 -0500
From: Slava Pestov sl...@factorcode.org
Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] documentation, examples and help...
To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
806f58f20909251757m16927f5oab3e7b34477f5...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
Hi everyone,
I finished GIF decode support in my gif branch
(http://github.com/klazuka/factor/tree/gif). Could someone please
review the code and merge it in if it is acceptable? I'm especially
interested to get feedback regarding code style. I should also note
that no effort at optimization has
Hi Dan,
The changes look good. I've merged them in.
Slava
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg micro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like, the way the compiler is right now, ##slot and
##set-slot are more complicated than they have to be. These
instructions do two
On Sep 26, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Keith Lazuka wrote:
Joe, a few of the definition icons did not convert well to GIF. It
seems like there is something weird about the original TIFFs since
when I load the TIFF into Photoshop, it doesn't look correct. Can you
please send me the vector originals so
Hi Keith,
The code changes look good, except for some stray debug messages in this patch:
http://github.com/klazuka/factor/commit/81ea3afbdc536e9ead1368af8d8a2e5ef7a98a0d
Look at 'handle-clear-code' and 'kdebug'.
However, I won't merge them until you fix the definition icons; you
mention that
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Hi everyone. Slava's itching to nuke the old C-STRUCT: and C-UNION:
features now that most of the code in the repository has been
switched
to use struct classes. The only holdouts are Jeremy Hughes'
alien.inline, alien.marshall, and alien.cxx
Hi everybody. All the code in the repository has been updated to use
the new struct classes, so Slava's decreed that the old alien.structs
mechanism shall now be gone. Brace yourselves.
-Joe
--
Come build with us!
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Hugh Aguilar hugoagui...@rosycrew.com wrote:
None of the spliting functions take an index however. All of
them are splitting on a particular subsequence.
I think you want 'cut' or 'cut*'. This is in the Subsequences and
Slices part of the help.
Chris.
--
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Hugh Aguilar hugoagui...@rosycrew.com wrote:
For example, I want to find a node in the list and split the list into two
lists at that point. With sequences, the function find returns an index into
the sequence. None of the spliting functions take an index
18 matches
Mail list logo
