Hi there,
first a big thank you to everyone, factor is just getting better and
better and I'm still moistly in love with it.
I've managed to use it in my job as a data-mining tool and the results
are rather pleasing. Unfortunately I'm bound to use Microsofts SQL
Server 2005 and there's no direct
On 10 March 2010 10:16, Ben Schlingelhof b...@benseins.de wrote:
Hi there,
first a big thank you to everyone, factor is just getting better and
better and I'm still moistly in love with it.
I've managed to use it in my job as a data-mining tool and the results
are rather pleasing.
On 10 March 2010 10:51, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there's an odbc vocabulary in Factor.
Hmm, looks like I may have been wrong. I was working from
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/01/odbc-interface-for-factor.html
but that looks like it's out of date as I can't find anything
On 03/11/2010 12:25 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
Hmm, looks like I may have been wrong. I was working from
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/01/odbc-interface-for-factor.html
but that looks like it's out of date as I can't find anything in the
current factor codebase.
It's in 'unmaintained/odbc' in
Thanks, everyone. I'll have a look at the odbc-port.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 14:11, Chris Double chris.dou...@double.co.nz wrote:
On 03/11/2010 12:25 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
Hmm, looks like I may have been wrong. I was working from
I have reworked everything but the translation of dates and will post a copy
shortly. I didn't want to do so incomplete, but no reason for you to redo
that work.
ffi:
http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=1572
lib:
http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=1573
odbc main:
Also, wanted to get the db.tuples working with this, but kept getting stuck.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Jim mack j...@less2do.com wrote:
I have reworked everything but the translation of dates and will post a
copy shortly. I didn't want to do so incomplete, but no reason for you to
Thanks Jim, most appreciated. When I received your mail, I'd already
managed to get it running and connected to our database. No harm done,
though, the effort duplicated obviously wasn't that much. I think,
this should be back in maintained. Who wants to do it? If nobody
volunteers, I would.
The
great paper littledan, to bad you have to halve it. I wish it could be a full
length paper.
Whatever
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
