On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:12:58PM -0600, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
I had never heard of staapl before but am now reading up on it at your
website; it looks pretty cool from what I've read so far. Do you have any
plans for upgrading from the PIC18 to the PIC24?
Yes, in the sense that I want to
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:20:04AM -0500, Slava Pestov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Tom Schoutent...@zwizwa.be wrote:
Bout time I have a look at it then.. Is the compiler tied in closely
to the rest of the system? I'm wondering if I it would be difficult
to embed it in PLT
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:54:55AM -0500, Slava Pestov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Tom Schoutent...@zwizwa.be wrote:
But, you're making me curious.
Is it possible to macro-translate Scheme into Factor?
I assume the answer is yes as I think Factor has compatible lexical
I'm also not sure if they are really 100% equivalent, since I'm
throwing in some extra specification of the order of evaluation. This
makes it possible to play tricks like using objects that only exist at
compile time without requiring any special notation for it: the eager
algorithm
