--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did publicity work for Chopra for years. I'm on a first
name basis with both his original movement publicist,
Carla Linton (-Browne) and Muriel Nellis (who is still
his publicist, last I heard). I know where at least
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I recall hearing is that Chopra was hoping to
include non-Ayurvedic (Chinese? Tibetan? His own?)
modalities in the Maharishi Ayurveda clinics and MMY
said no. This prompted Douliard to leave the Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
Who the hell cares? He wasn't there when the Beatles were
in Rishikesh.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of sparaig
Nyah. Except maybe on YOUR part, to not note she's correct
about this. Few people ever call Barry on his Judy obsession
except to joke about it, but many make hostile remarks
towards
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
On Behalf Of sparaig
Nyah. Except maybe on YOUR part, to not note she's correct
about this. Few people ever call Barry on his Judy obsession
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
steve.sundur@ wrote:
I blame Chopra for that as much as anyone. Chopra is the one who
decided to become the media darling rather than sit at the feet
We (including Chopra himself, quite consciously --I know his
publicists, remember)
literally worked for years to make Deepak Chopra a household word
in order to further
the goals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and the TMO and he took our work and
betrayed us.
But Lawson, you know what it is like to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
steve.sundur@ wrote:
I blame Chopra for that as much as anyone. Chopra is the one who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, abutilon108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thankful to Deepak for sharing his personal experiences with
Maharishi and the circumstances of his leaving the movement. Of
course, it's a beautifully written piece, and seems quite
straightforward and honest.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
I blame Chopra for that as much as anyone. Chopra is the one who
decided to become the media darling rather than sit at the feet of the
guru. The entire thing with the rajas and whatnot is obviously a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The fact that you can overcome it now and limit
your number of posts and yet claimed for years
that you couldn't *because* of the brain dys-
function makes it applicable.
I claimed that my ADHD made itimpossible
Lawson, I just sent you an email to whatever email address
you have registered with Yahoo (i.e., I sent it via the Web
site).
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We (including Chopra himself, quite consciously --I know his
publicists, remember) literally worked for years to make
Deepak Chopra a household word in order to further
the goals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm just trying to point out that Lawson's seem-
ingly noble stance ain't quite as noble as he'd
like to portray. Using his line of reasoning,
everyone who ever contributed big bucks to one
of Maharishi's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
We (including Chopra himself, quite consciously --I know his
publicists, remember) literally worked for years to make
Deepak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
[...]
The fact that you can overcome it now and limit
your number of posts and yet claimed for years
that you couldn't *because* of the brain dys-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Chopra is whatever he is. I DON'T CARE.
What is becoming apparent, however, is what YOU
and the others who are writing hundreds of lines
to FFL demonizing him are.
Angry, vindictive, obsessed, and above all,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, abutilon108 abutilon108@
wrote:
I'm thankful to Deepak for sharing his personal experiences with
Maharishi and the circumstances of his leaving the movement. Of
course, it's a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just one of those wonderful double standards--
er, I mean, contradictions--that Curtis is so
fond of, I guess.
Or more technically gay for. However I am just as gay for your
wicked sense of humor Judy so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I had the opportunity to exchange a few sentences with Dr. Chopra
not too long after he left the TMO. He essentially said the same
thing. Iindicating that the JAMA lawsuit was the final straw.
That was my
Just one of those wonderful double standards--
er, I mean, contradictions--that Curtis is so
fond of, I guess.
Or more technically gay for. However I am just as gay for your
wicked sense of humor Judy so please don't feel gay deprived.
My beef with Chopra revolved around him giving me a magic
BTW, did you pay a $700 check made out to Deepak Chopra or was it
made out to the non-profit Maharishi Ayurveda Fund (MAF)?
Good question, I can't remember. I may have a paper trail somewhere.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Lawson wrote:]
BTW, did you pay a $700 check made out to Deepak Chopra or was it
made out to the non-profit Maharishi Ayurveda Fund (MAF)?
Good question, I can't remember. I may have a paper trail
somewhere.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bingo.
Selfless service is called that because it's
selfless; you're do the work because it gives
you joy to do the work. If you EXPECT something
in returh, then it's not really selfless
service now, is it?...Every
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I had the opportunity to exchange a few sentences with Dr. Chopra not
too long after he left the TMO. He essentially said the same thing.
Iindicating that the JAMA lawsuit was the final straw. He had just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
--- authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
That was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak
geezerfreak@
wrote:
snip
Your and Judith's remarks about Chopra's (quite open and honest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
snip
Your and Judith's remarks about Chopra's (quite open and honest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, Chopra was well after my time in the TMO
and, if I remember correctly, after yours as well.
Therefore I have no feelings about him one way or
another, and I've always wondered about the
strong anti-Chopra
Towards the end MMY was clearly irritated by Chopra - I remember
seeing a video where Chopra was speaking to the camera and MMY was in
the background and clearly noticeable were subtle side to side
movements of his jaw or face. Basically unlike Hagelin who talks
about Physics in a way MMY
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:18 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Deepak Chopra: The Maharishi Years - The Untold
Story: Recollections of a Fo
Yes, and the
I blame Chopra for that as much as anyone. Chopra is the one who
decided to become the media darling rather than sit at the feet of the
guru. The entire thing with the rajas and whatnot is obviously a
direct response to Chopra. You can't get on Oprah wearing a silly-
looking crown.
Lawson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
--- authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Yes, and the american purusha that poisened him.
The story didn't identify the suspect as an American Purusha.
Just a Westerner.
The very assumption that there *was* a poisoning
is
--- claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. And I was
told that MMY said to Chopra much the same thing
he'd said to Ravi
Shankar - if you need to teach go ahead but we must
go our separate
ways.. Interesting that both Chopra Ravi Shankar
featured in
commentaries about MMY after his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I blame Chopra for that as much as anyone. Chopra is the one who
decided to become the media darling rather than sit at the feet
of the guru. The entire thing with the rajas and whatnot is
obviously a
Everyone can be pretty sure Bevan will push the Maharishi envelope as
superlatively as anything Maharishi did. It will still be fun to watch. this
is one reason I have been excited by the TM Movement stories my whole life;
at least it's totally fascinating metadrama.
This pretty much sums up my impression of the man also. 3 doctors in
the ambulance, and only himself, after the car reached the hospital
was able to revive a dead body ? Sounds very strange.
-That sounds strange to you? That sounds strange.
But Nablusoss1008 is Aliester Crowley
and I've always wondered about the
strong anti-Chopra feelings I've seen expressed
on groups like this one.
--Well, Ayurveda became a focal point in the mid eighties. First we saw
all the vaidyas, then later yet we got Chopra for a spell. he seemed to me
like a latecomer to the TMO who
You can't blame Maharishi for being overly polite, that's a typically Indian
way of treating others. People namaste and bow and it's easy to develop the
flowery style of propping people. Then Maharishi found that people liked it
so he further worked with it. Deepak, or anyone, should not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Geez, Chopra was well after my time in the TMO
and, if I remember correctly, after yours as well.
Therefore I have no feelings about him one way or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...even Bevan will be hard pressed to remember his motivation
soon
and within ten years it's likely this first TM Movement will
be basically over
I believe that Deepak shows that even those closest to Maharishi
Damn! You're on a real roll today, Kirk.
Well said. That's it exactly.
Yeah I agree. Kirk is serving up some mad intellectual gumbo this
trip. Keep it up brother!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
So, geeze, what do you make of the fact that Chopra's
given two
--- Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I've always wondered about the
strong anti-Chopra feelings I've seen expressed
on groups like this one.
--Well, Ayurveda became a focal point in the mid
eighties. First we saw
all the vaidyas, then later yet we got Chopra for a
spell. he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernhardt@
wrote:
...even Bevan will be hard pressed to remember his motivation
soon
and within ten years it's likely this first TM Movement will
be
Was MMY was incommunicado between August 1, 1991 - August 1,1992?
Did MMY move to Vlodrop late 1992? Where is Neil Patterson?
Nandkishore? Jerry Jarvis? etc.? Too many rumors. Can someone
please write a factual Inside the TMO book?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL
Maharishi, after all, did the same thing. We have
NO IDEA what the real story of Guru Dev was.
All we have is Maharishi's view of who and what
he was. And that view is often at odds with the
view of other people who were students of Guru
Dev's at the same time Mahesh was. The only
reason
Kirk, did you notice that Chopra, as a mouthpiece for
MMY's teaching, got it wrong a lot? I used to listen
to him at various TMO events and realize that he
didn't have a clear understanding of what Maharishi
was talking about. I think this is because he didn't
spend all that time watching
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think Deepak's credibility in this story comes down to this:
Is it true what he says about Maharishi being incommunicado
with the public (i.e., us, we the meditators) for such a
long period of time?
This
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:18 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Deepak Chopra:
this reads like a 21st century rig veda - imagine the commentaries on
this piece written 5000 years in the future.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi, after all, did the same thing. We have
NO IDEA what the real story of Guru Dev was.
All we have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The very assumption that there *was* a poisoning
is the part of Chopra's story that sounds weird
to me. He's a doctor; how could he even suggest
such a thing if no one ever did the tests to
support that theory?
At
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This pretty much sums up my impression of the man also. 3 doctors in
the ambulance, and only himself, after the car reached the hospital
was able to revive a dead body ? Sounds very strange.
-That sounds strange to
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:50 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Deepak Chopra: The Maharishi Years - The Untold
Story: Recollections of a Fo
USA is still
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:15 AM, authfriend wrote:
(So much for Barry's umpteenth vow, made just
yesterday, not to respond to me. This is the way
he usually sneaks back in, by ostensibly
responding to someone else who has responded to
me and demonizing me in those comments, without
mentioning my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Houston, I think we have a problem. At the very
least, Chopra has some questions to answer.
In addition to Chopra's contradictory stories about
why the Beatles left Rishikesh, and the apparent
falsehoods in Chopra's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi, after all, did the same thing. We have
NO IDEA what the real story of Guru Dev was.
All we have is Maharishi's view of who and what
he was. And that view is often at odds with the
view of other people who were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:50 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Deepak Chopra: The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:15 AM, authfriend wrote:
(So much for Barry's umpteenth vow, made just
yesterday, not to respond to me. This is the way
he usually sneaks back in, by ostensibly
responding to someone else
Sal, who here hasn't asked these two to stop with the incessant and
pointless feuding. Obvious to one and all, irritating to the max,
incapable of being ended because the 'other' always starts it up
again.
Turq posts with a broad (and often cheeky) brush and Judy can't
resist calling him on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sal, who here hasn't asked these two to stop with the incessant
and pointless feuding. Obvious to one and all, irritating to
the max, incapable of being ended because the 'other' always
starts it up again.
Turq
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis reavismarek@
wrote:
Sal, who here hasn't asked these two to stop with the incessant
and pointless feuding. Obvious to one and all, irritating to
the max,
Kirk wrote:
I also under the auspices of the Kanchi Shank
and other Sri Vidya devotees was the only white
guy out of a hundred Hindus to be in the first
Saundaraya Lahiri Japa Yajna
So, you're thinking that there is an oral tradition
in India and that the TM bija mantras are derived
from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'll be obvious to one and all at FFL when Sat Yuga finally dawns.
Another nomination for Quote Of The Week. The first one was pretty damn goog
though...
You folks crack me up.
Judy, the only person who cares if if was a Gotta Get Judy post is
you and maybe Barry. Perhaps you excercise tremendous constraint and
don't reply as often as you'd like to Barry's posts. All I can say
is what has been said by many, many people who post here, myself
included -- it's boring,
On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Sal, who here hasn't asked these two to stop with the incessant and
pointless feuding. Obvious to one and all, irritating to the max,
incapable of being ended because the 'other' always starts it up
again.
Turq posts with a broad (and often
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
The very assumption that there *was* a poisoning
is the part of Chopra's story that sounds weird
to me. He's a doctor; how could he even suggest
Bija mantras exist in many tantras. Lakshmi tantra of Vaisnavas and
Upanishads from Narasimhanada and so on. Mantras are not news. They exist
in many works including Shrimaddevi Bhagavatum, the Devi Purana. Mantras of
the bija style pervade the puranas and were primary to the whole Vedic
I heard Maharishi once been saying that the TM-Mantras came from the so-called
mantra shastras. I have never been studying them, but he said that this is a
complete source, which may even contain the mantras of physical immortality,
which have once been carried off by some demon .
-
Kirk wrote:
Bija mantras exist in many tantras.
Maybe so, but aren't most of the tantras relativlely
recent? Most of the works which mention bija mantras
are recent compositions. For example, the Tripura
Upanishad was probably composed as recently as the
18th century. My point is that the
Hagen wrote:
I heard Maharishi once been saying that the TM-Mantras
came from the so-called mantra shastras. I have never
been studying them, but he said that this is a complete
source, which may even contain the mantras of physical
immortality, which have once been carried off by some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hagen J. Holtz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I heard Maharishi once been saying that the TM-Mantras came from the
so-called mantra
shastras. I have never been studying them, but he said that this is a complete
source, which
may even contain the mantras of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hagen J. Holtz
hagen.j.holtz@ wrote:
I heard Maharishi once been saying that the TM-Mantras came
from the so-called mantra shastras. I have never been studying
them, but he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hagen J. Holtz
hagen.j.holtz@ wrote:
I heard Maharishi once been saying that the TM-Mantras came
Marek:
It would be nice to hear a legal opinion on the following:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/165362
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sal, who here hasn't asked these two to stop with the incessant and
pointless
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@ wrote:
Judy, the only person who cares if if was a Gotta Get Judy
post is you and maybe Barry. Perhaps you excercise tremendous
constraint and
I'm thankful to Deepak for sharing his personal experiences with
Maharishi and the circumstances of his leaving the movement. Of
course, it's a beautifully written piece, and seems quite
straightforward and honest. Clearly Chopra is reflecting on the
contradictory impressions he is left with of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, abutilon108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thankful to Deepak for sharing his personal experiences with
Maharishi and the circumstances of his leaving the movement. Of
course, it's a beautifully written piece, and seems quite
straightforward and honest.
I read your website on the subject. Earliest pictures of Lakshmi are
Buddhist coins of Gaja or Elephant Lakshmi from 100 CE. The Shri Suktam is
considered late Vedic at placed at 400 BCE. If you know the Shree Suktam
then you know the original 16 quatrains have the associated letters of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, the only person who cares if if was a Gotta Get Judy
post is you and maybe Barry. Perhaps you excercise tremendous
constraint and don't reply as often as you'd like to Barry's
posts. All I can say is what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, since so many appeals (and brickbats) have
already been addressed to (or thrown at) me alone, I'm
not inclined to entertain even appeals addressed to
both of us until after I see a bunch of them addressed
to
Shemp, I'm not an expert here. As has been pointed out and based on
what Chopra has written, the times he attended on Maharishi in a
physician context was in India and England, both of those instances
would have put him out of the jurisdictional reach of any U.S.
court. Maybe not outside of
Maybe doctor-patient confidentiality is stricter for
psychologists than for medical doctors.
--- Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shemp, I'm not an expert here. As has been pointed
out and based on
what Chopra has written, the times he attended on
Maharishi in a
physician context
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Actually, since so many appeals (and brickbats) have
already been addressed to (or thrown at) me alone, I'm
not inclined to entertain even appeals addressed
Peter, it might be that being treated by a psychologist or
psychiatrist is itself something of an admission that the patient has
mental health issues and that carries something of a stigma that
going to a medical doctor doesn't, and consequently there's that
extra proviso. But that's only my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, abutilon108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm thankful to Deepak for sharing his personal experiences with
Maharishi and the circumstances of his leaving the movement. Of
course, it's a beautifully written piece, and seems quite
straightforward and honest.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Your and Judith's remarks about Chopra's (quite open and honest IMO) article
in the
Huffington Post reveal an obvious agenda against him.
In the past day we've had Bevan talking about Maharishi being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
snip
Your and Judith's remarks about Chopra's (quite open and honest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
The whole symptomatology is impossibly vague. And maybe it wasn't
actually pancreatitis but just a bad pain in the gut symptomatic of
the heart attack. Which would lead you down a whole 'nother path.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Towards the end MMY was clearly irritated by Chopra - I remember
seeing a video where Chopra was speaking to the camera and MMY was in
the background and clearly noticeable were subtle side to side
movements of his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. And I was
told that MMY said to Chopra much the same thing
he'd said to Ravi
Shankar - if you need to teach go ahead but we must
go our separate
ways.. Interesting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@ wrote:
Judy, the only person who cares if if was a Gotta Get Judy
post is you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
That whole pastoral idyll in England Chopra
describes having alone with MMY seems to have
been some kind of wish-fulfillment fantasy.
Fascinating... Where did you hear this?
Lawson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
[...]
She's often speculated that its the fact she's a *woman* that
draws certain people's ire. I often think so also.
Appreciate the support, but I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ wrote:
[...]
Who the hell cares? He wasn't there when the Beatles were in Rishikesh.
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
