--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead to
different levels of
ethics.
MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/27/05 9:13 AM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also how it seems to be done everywhere by tmers who have
worked
closely with mmy. A recent example in Canada being Governors Corp,
headed
John Cowhig now has a job walking around in the forest looking
for pieces of
wood suitable for making guitars. Sounds like a nice job to me.
Who does he work for?
I'm interested, too, not because John Cowhig means
anything to me, but because I know a few good luthiers,
and am
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
The TMO has always related higher levels of
consciousness
on 12/28/05 7:05 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Cowhig now has a job walking around in the forest looking for
pieces of
wood suitable for making guitars. Sounds like a nice job to me.
Who does he work for?
Don't know.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead to
different levels of
ethics.
MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
a life-supportive
way has nuances: in CC, one doesn't act in a way
that harms one's own
evolution. In higher states,
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/26/05 4:14 PM, Alex Stanley at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without
Ethics you will not
get Enlightened. Want to know why?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead to
different levels of
ethics.
MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
a life-supportive
way has nuances: in
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead to
different levels of
ethics.
MMY's point about an enlightened person
On Dec 26, 2005, at 10:07 PM, sparaig wrote:In Ken's parlance, 'acting unethical is still within dualities, it's merely the photographic negative of ethical activity.' Having said that it is possible to appear to be acting unethically when actually the intent is to awaken. If you've ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead to
different levels of
ethics.
MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving in
a life-supportive
way has nuances: in CC, one doesn't act in a way
that harms one's
--- markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different states of consciousness may lead to
different levels of
ethics.
MMY's point about an enlightened person behaving
in
a life-supportive
way has
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
The TMO has always related higher levels of
consciousness with increased moral behavior, but the
research is pretty weak in this area.
Have you actually leafed through the journals to review
research on TM and moral behavior, Peter? I somehow
got the impression the
--- Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
The TMO has always related higher levels of
consciousness with increased moral behavior, but
the
research is pretty weak in this area.
Have you actually leafed through the journals to
review
research on TM and moral
on 12/27/05 9:13 AM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also how it seems to be done everywhere by tmers who have worked
closely with mmy. A recent example in Canada being Governors Corp,
headed up by former personal secretaries John Cowhig and his buddy and
by tm-sidhis
On Dec 27, 2005, at 10:13 AM, markmeredith2002 wrote: It's also how it seems to be done everywhere by tmers who have worked closely with mmy. A recent example in Canada being Governors Corp, headed up by former personal secretaries John Cowhig and his buddy and by tm-sidhis administrator greg
--- Peter wrote:
I'd have to look at it again. But I remember whenever
I looked at it I was always bothered by some aspects
of it. Do you have a reference?
Unfortunately, no. I spent some time Googling but couldn't
find a study you could read on the web. (I seldom find studies
I can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
The TMO has always related higher levels of
consciousness with increased moral behavior, but
the
research is pretty weak in this area.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/26/05 11:41 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will
not get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will not
get Enlightened. Want to know why?
The happy dream of Samsara: feeling good by doing good. The
Nightmare: hurting ourselves by hurting others. It's our
on 12/26/05 4:14 PM, Alex Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethics won't get you Enlightened. But without Ethics you will not
get Enlightened. Want to know why?
The happy dream of Samsara: feeling good by doing good.
On Dec 26, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:I can well imagine the possibility that an enlightened person could then go on to act unethically, since the flavor of the dualistic dream state becomes a whole lot less relevant (or, even completely irrelevant?) In Ken's parlance, 'acting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 26, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
I can well imagine the possibility that an enlightened person
could
then go on to act unethically, since the flavor of the dualistic
dream
state becomes a whole lot
27 matches
Mail list logo
