Don't be ridiculous, Xeno. You would look *very* silly
trying to parse that paragraph--especially in the context
of the rest of the statement--to fit the spontaneous
event scenario.
No, it's easy. If it turned out the act was a spontaneous
response to the anti-Muslim video, he
raunchydog:
It doesn't matter Obama killed Osama Ben Laden, the right
wing trope that he is weak on terrorism must stand at all
costs...
What I'd like to hear is Barack Obama resigning over Benghazi,
the most extreme public mishandling of an attack on American
personnel ever, certainly in
anartaxius:
SEPTEMBER 24, 2012: President Obama Appeared On The View
And Again Refused To Call The Attack Terrorism...
This is going to be a case study, studied for years, of a
breakdown of national security at every level, failed
presidential leadership senior members of the Obama
You have erroneously included me in the conversation on this topic, Richard, an
interesting mistake to make. However, I agree that Obama was issuing a
statement that, based on limited, or perhaps conflicting intelligence available
at the time, used words that would allow him room to claim that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, marekreavis reavismarek@... wrote:
I agree that Obama was issuing a statement that, based on
limited, or perhaps conflicting intelligence available at
the time, used words that would allow him room to claim
that he had truthfully and accurately
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
snip
Don't be ridiculous, Xeno. You would look *very* silly
trying to parse that paragraph--especially in the context
of the rest of the
In all fairness, despite my discontent with Obama, I don't necessarily hold
anything too strongly against him for the deaths of the people in this attack.
I know that they could've used more security, but then again, there are
thousands of places that could've been built up better where
The first sentence is a generalization about acts of
terror; the next three sentences make it crystal clear
that he was considering the Benghazi attack to be one
of those acts of terror.
wgm4u:
Actually he specifically refers to Benghazi here as
this terrible act,
Most of what you think you know is wrong:
Cutting Through the Fog on Benghazi: A Brief QA
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/10/cutting-through-fog-benghazi-brief-qa
...Bottom line: There were conflicting reports on the ground, and that was
reflected in conflicting and sometimes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
snip
For example, this article following, in the Huffington Post,
generally favorable to Obama does not share your extreme
positivity about the administration's handling of the affair
in an unambiguous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
snip
For example, this article following, in the
authfriend:
Most of what you think you know is wrong:
Ironically, the Sept. 15 talking points that were
the basis for Rice's televised comments were requested
by the House intelligence committee. Ideally, the
congressional oversight committees would provide
bipartisan support for
It doesn't matter Obama killed Osama Ben Laden, the right wing trope that he is
weak on terrorism must stand at all costs. They are so disparate to win this
election they endlessly lie, lie, lie and twist the truth. BillyG and Xeno are
simply following the biggest liar ever to run for the
And here she goes again:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
Always you are the honest one.
Yeah, sorry you have a problem with the person you're
arguing with being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@... wrote:
And here she goes again:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
Always you are the honest one.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@ wrote:
And here she goes again:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@ wrote:
And here she goes again:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@ wrote:
And here she goes again:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@ wrote:
And here
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
snip
He clearly, unambiguously included the Benghazi attack in
his remark about acts of terror:
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this
The first sentence is a generalization about acts of
terror; the next three sentences make it crystal clear
that he was considering the Benghazi attack to be one
of those acts of terror.
wgm4u:
Actually he specifically refers to Benghazi here as
this terrible act, that's NOT a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
snip
He clearly, unambiguously included the Benghazi attack in
his remark about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote:
The first sentence is a generalization about acts of
terror; the next three sentences make it crystal clear
that he was considering the Benghazi attack to be one
of those acts of terror.
wgm4u:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@... wrote:
And here she goes again:
LOL. You know what's going on, right? This has
nothing to do with anything Xeno said about
anything; it's about him saying that he thought
I was more spiritual than Robin. Judy will try
to make him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote:
The first sentence is a generalization about acts of
terror; the next three sentences make it crystal clear
that he was considering
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@
wrote:
The first sentence is a generalization about acts of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 no_reply@ wrote:
And here she goes again:
LOL. You know what's going on, right? This has
nothing to do with anything Xeno said about
anything; it's about him saying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night)
by suggesting on day one he was calling it a terrorist
attack, this was a mis-characterization of what he was
saying on day one (in the Rose Garden!) and everybody
knows it except Judy and Raunch!
authfriend:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote:
The fact is, the State Department refused to reinforce
security in Benghazi on 9/11 and the al Qaeda terrorsits
blew it up and killed our Ambassador and three others.
The video had nothing to do with it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote:
The fact is, the State Department refused to reinforce
security in Benghazi on 9/11 and the al Qaeda terrorsits
blew it up and killed
raunchydog:
I knew that the administration had -- from the beginning
-- warned that the Benghazi event (unlike the spontaneous
protest in Cairo) might well have been planned long before
that video became known...
Apparently the White House thought the attack was because
of the film trailer.
Share Long:
...learning a ot!
.the actual presidential transcript make it clear that
Obama was doing his best to include the word terror
without actually saying the incident was a terror attack.
FoxNews:
http://tinyurl.com/d96u2ts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote:
.the actual presidential transcript make it clear that
Obama was doing his best to include the word terror
without actually saying the incident was a terror attack.
Um, no, it does nothing of the kind. He referred
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night) by suggesting on day one
he was calling it a terrorist attack, this was a mis-characterization of what
he was saying on day one (in the Rose Garden!) and everybody knows it except
Judy and Raunch!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night) by suggesting on day
one he was calling it a terrorist attack, this was a mis-characterization of
what he was saying on day one (in the Rose Garden!) and everybody knows it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night) by suggesting on day
one he was calling it a terrorist attack, this was a mis-characterization
of
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night)
by suggesting on day one he was calling it a terrorist
attack, this was a mis-characterization of what he was
saying on day one (in the Rose Garden!) and everybody
knows it except Judy and Raunch!
authfriend:
BillyG, forget
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote:
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night)
by suggesting on day one he was calling it a terrorist
attack, this was a mis-characterization of what he was
saying on day one (in the Rose Garden!)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote:
Correct, the President told a subtle lie (last night)
by suggesting on day one he was calling it a terrorist
attack, this was a
Ah semantics. When something like Benghazi happens, governments have a lot to
think about. What happened? Did we screw up somehow? Do we have to cover our
asses? How shall we respond? There is also the concern that saying something
abrupt might endanger relations with the government in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
Ah semantics. When something like Benghazi happens, governments have a lot to
think about. What happened? Did we screw up somehow? Do we have to cover our
asses? How shall we respond? There is also the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
Ah semantics. When something like Benghazi happens, governments have a lot
to think about. What happened? Did we screw up somehow? Do we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
Ah semantics. When something like Benghazi happens,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
Ah semantics. When something like Benghazi happens, governments have a lot to
think about. What happened? Did we screw up somehow? Do we have to cover our
asses? How shall we respond? There is also the
46 matches
Mail list logo
