Vaj says:
I like some of what Christy says:
You won't like this!
More Carbon Dioxide, Please
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWJlODMxYmUzYWNmZGZiM2NhNmExYTYyNDUzYmViZjQ=
If that doesn't make you choke on your toast, I'm a Dutchman...
On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Richard M wrote:
Notice the phrase the world's most prominent scientists rather than
the world's most prominent climate or meteorology scientists.
This seems to be an appeal to priesthood pedigree rather than
scientific rationality?
Your conclusion, not mine.
This story about the sham Heartland Institute is currently breaking:
http://www.desmogblog.com/500-scientists-with-documented-doubts-about-the-heartland-institute
Dozens of scientists are demanding that their names be removed from a
widely distributed Heartland Institute article entitled 500
A fascinating look at this trend. Thanks for sharing this Boo.
What saddens me is that there is a certain group of people who will
hear of this Heartland Institute and actually use it to confirm their
conviction that Global Climate Change is a hoax. Given that I've
watched time after time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Richard M wrote:
Notice the phrase the world's most prominent scientists rather
than
the world's most prominent climate or meteorology scientists.
This seems to be an appeal to priesthood
On Apr 30, 2008, at 8:24 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Richard M wrote:
Notice the phrase the world's most prominent scientists rather
than
the world's most prominent climate or meteorology
But if that's your guiding light, what ad hominem will you
deploy to denigrate climate sceptics such as Richard Lindzen,
atmospheric physicist and the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of
Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology?
They say you should be careful what you wish for. Silly
On Apr 30, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Richard M wrote:
But if that's your guiding light, what ad hominem will you
deploy to denigrate climate sceptics such as Richard Lindzen,
atmospheric physicist and the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of
Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology?
They say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Richard M wrote:
But if that's your guiding light, what ad hominem will you
deploy to denigrate climate sceptics such as Richard Lindzen,
atmospheric physicist and the Alfred P. Sloan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Read more:
'Wikipedia's zealots'
By Lawrence Solomon
Financial Post, Saturday, April 12, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/4f7jxj
[snip]
The above article is so important, Willytex, that it deserves to
On Apr 29, 2008, at 5:44 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
My
Deniers series, which now runs to some 40 columns, describes many of
the world's most prominent scientists.
Notice the phrase the world's most prominent scientists rather than
the world's most prominent climate or meteorology scientists.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 5:44 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
My
Deniers series, which now runs to some 40 columns, describes many
of
the world's most prominent scientists.
Notice the phrase the world's most prominent scientists
Notice the phrase the world's most prominent scientists rather than
the world's most prominent climate or meteorology scientists.
This seems to be an appeal to priesthood pedigree rather than
scientific rationality?
But if that's your guiding light, what ad hominem will you deploy to
13 matches
Mail list logo
