authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
In fact the impression I got was that
the war was more a failed exercise in trying to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 14 hour Ken Burn's documentary on World War II
debuted this week on PBS. Since 14 hours is quite
a bit to invest I have been archiving it to watch
when I have time. I just completed episode one and
was struck with
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact the impression I got was that
the war was more a failed exercise in trying to
reduce the world's population dramatically. And there
is a section on how they got people in the US to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
In fact the impression I got was that
the war was more a failed exercise in trying to
reduce the world's population
Bhairitu,
I agree.
IMO, there is a cabal of backroom evil rich manipulators running
things, and it makes perfect sense that the follow the money concept
is never supported in most documentary endeavors -- too risky to the
film-maker to snoop around in Big Finance's underwear drawer, and way
hard
Duveyoung wrote:
Bhairitu,
I agree.
IMO, there is a cabal of backroom evil rich manipulators running
things, and it makes perfect sense that the follow the money concept
is never supported in most documentary endeavors -- too risky to the
film-maker to snoop around in Big Finance's
On Sep 28, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
Bhairitu,
I agree.
IMO, there is a cabal of backroom evil rich manipulators running
things, and it makes perfect sense that the follow the money concept
is never supported in most documentary endeavors -- too risky to the
film-maker to snoop
