--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm sure you're right, Jim. Who can know the future?, but
> I wasn't predicting so much as I was summing up a stance I
> have about the TMO. If it's a slow news week, maybe Maharishi's
> death would make bigger headl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm sure you're right, Jim. Who can know the future?, but I wasn't
> predicting so much as I was summing up a stance I have about the
TMO.
> If it's a slow news week, maybe Maharishi's death would make
bigger
> headl
I'm sure you're right, Jim. Who can know the future?, but I wasn't
predicting so much as I was summing up a stance I have about the TMO.
If it's a slow news week, maybe Maharishi's death would make bigger
headlines. Or, if someone actually hovered, then all bets would be
off. Hell, I'd be a tru
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nice riff, Turq. As usual.
>
> I'd add this. I don't think Maharishi will get more than one column
> in Newsweek or Time for an obituary.
As a neutral observation, both you and Turq sound awfully bitter about
so
Excellent points by both MDixon and Edg about
the fleeting nature of fame, and how Maharishi
will probably really be remembered. Not much to
add to what they said, except to address one
challenge below.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And, I'm betting
Nice riff, Turq. As usual.
I'd add this. I don't think Maharishi will get more than one column
in Newsweek or Time for an obituary.
Oh, maybe a whole page if the magazine wants to, sigh, once again
splash some photo of the Beatles and serve the popular myth that every
publication since 1968
