On Jun 17, 2007, at 2:00 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only
Ron wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
Are we
Thanks for the correction but I could swear she said in one of the
videos she at least met her master near Rishikesh. I also got the
impression from the video that she didn't spend that much time with him
(and he has passed on). It took me 5 years to get commissioned to
Swami and I can only
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Ron wrote:
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
* I doubt it. I've come across Swami G
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies would those be, Vaj?
The ones exposed here (sorry, accidentally
On Jun 12, 2007, at 10:47 AM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:34 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct experience being in that
On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:24 PM, boo_lives wrote:
So you think GD just
dumped him, saying: you are not a Brahmin, you are only a Brahmachari?
No, he dumped him, saying: Hit the road, Jack.
I find this logic ridiculous and even arrogant.
Me too. I mean, GD really could have gone to the trouble
On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:24 PM, boo_lives wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only correctly
accorded a Hatha Yogi?
Not necessarily a hatha yogi, but a practitioner of yoga-darshana
(which includes
Ron, please forward this to Swami G.
I my judgment of MMY was solely based on his
behavior I too would doubt the legitimacy of him and
his teachings. I agree with you, and there are many
others also in the TMO that see his behavior as
strange, to say the least. But while I have this
surface
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:37 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev's deathbed instructions to Maharishi .
. .
According to Marshy, the thought of going
In a message dated 6/4/2007 11:30:27 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charlie Lutes said once at a lecture I attended that Maharishi was told by
Guru Dev on his death bed that the timing for this knowledge to be shared
with the world is now. That Maharishi should
13 matches
Mail list logo
