On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:26 PM, gullible fool wrote:
I meant some of their posts, certainly not all of
them. Up until your recent activities, I had been
getting zero posts by quite a few of the 35-45 posts
per month types because I had placed them on block.
There's not even enough time to read all
On Nov 19, 2007, at 6:51 PM, gullible fool wrote:
You mean there are some posts here that *aren't*
like that??
Oh. :)
Your posts, for one, which I enjoy reading.
Thank you.
Sal
You mean there are some posts here that *aren't*
like that??
Oh. :)
Oh, I should add you do have an occasional joust that
some might say should be included in the bickering
category, but those posts are even more enjoyable to
read. :)
--- Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov
You mean there are some posts here that *aren't*
like that??
Oh. :)
Your posts, for one, which I enjoy reading.
--- Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:26 PM, gullible fool wrote:
I meant some of their posts, certainly not all of
them. Up until your recent
Another issue is there are some members who I have on
permanent block because I do not want to read their
35-45 posts (soon to be 50-60 posts) per month. Now, I
am going to be force-fed these members' posts due to
their being posted by another member.
--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alex Stanley
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 11:36 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Updating Header Topics
Yes, and it's a duplicate of the post that showed up in email. One can
still
Why do you think you will be force-fed 60 extra
posts per excluded
poster per month? Perhaps you are misunderstanding
the simple and
relatively inobtrusive process of updating heading
topics.
I meant some of their posts, certainly not all of
them. Up until your recent activities, I had