Why don't you think the American people would elect her?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is not a fit
candidate. Mainly because I don't think the American people would ever elect
her!
Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...!
emilymaenot wrote:
Why don't you think the American people would elect her?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Well, speaking as a Democrat I'd say that Hillary Clinton is
I know...I was just teasing her because she is so transparent about it! LOL
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Because she hopes it will annoy me if she says so, of course. As if...!
emilymaenot wrote:
Why don't you think the American people would
:
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus
10 years!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
I know...I was just teasing her because she is
so
liters of H2O per day -- minus
10 years!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
I know...I was just teasing her because she is
so transparent about it! LOL
.
On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day --
minus 10 years!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 7:21 PM
: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day -- minus
10 years!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 1, 2013, 1:49 PM
I know...I was just teasing her because she is
so transparent about it! LOL
---In FairfieldLife
than
a faithful one who is a nobody.
On Fri, 11/1/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@...
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 liters of H2O per day --
minus 10 years
What we should all recognize (but only some of us have the smarts to
understand) is that NOBODY KNOWS what goes on inside a marriage but the two
people in it. (Unless they choose to tell us; Bill and Hillary chose not to
tell us what went on between them with regard to the Monica affair. And
I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one
willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private
life is also going to come under scrutiny. My opinion is based on the
observable behaviors not on what I imagine anyone was thinking or feeling.
Share tries to dig herself out of her hole:
I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one
willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private
life
is also going to come under scrutiny.
Yes, this is a recent but very unfortunate
Fair enough - your opinions, and your vote, are certainly your own, but to cast
Hillary as some sort of victim, and an enabler, simply because of what was
exposed, I think is short-sighted.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
I agree that no one
There's so much featherheaded crap in even Share's shorter utterances, I don't
always notice all of it right away.
She actually wrote this:
(snip)
I mean, that affair occurred on the world stage!
Hard to believe, eh?
Doc, it's not just because of what was exposed. It was how she reacted to what
was exposed. And that she was an enabler, allowing it to happen over and over
during all those previous years and doing seemingly little to take a stand
against it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Who knows the truth of it? I kinda agree with Judy on this one, about the
public view of private lives, up to a point. For example, that former head of
the IMF, who turned out to be a rapist, should be publicly castrated, imo. As
far as Bill and Hillary, though, and all of their drama, all I
I still don't understand how Clinton could have been so well, dumb. Was she
really that attractive?! Ok, maybe he cracked under the pressure of the job.
But really, so much about it is unfathomable. Must be karma (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Says Share, still trying desperately to annoy me even though Doc has clearly
indicated he has no desire to dump on either of the Clintons:
I still don't understand how Clinton could have been so well, dumb. Was she
really that attractive?! Ok,
maybe he cracked under the pressure of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
