No, it's not a "fair summary." It's actually a compendium of lies, one of
Barry's specialties. See my post to Share with links to documentation of
several of the biggest lies in his post.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Actually Turq's is a fair summary of a longer history.
I
"We"??
Yes, anyone who "remembers it differently" definitely needs to read those
articles about false memories.
Share continues to confabulate:
> Judy, we remember it differently. Several articles about faulty memories
> have been posted recently. I think
> they apply also.
---
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Actually Turq's is a fair summary of a longer history.
I feel Rick as owner here in conjunction with Yahoo Groups unkindness
guidelines
has good grounds to act swiftly and summarily on this.
Rick would not even need to explain himself doing i
Judy, we remember it differently. Several articles about faulty memories have
been posted recently. I think they apply also.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Share doubles down on her lie:
> RWC and I had our big upset on Sept 6 and then Dudy butted in on Sept 9.
> Before
Share doubles down on her lie:
> RWC and I had our big upset on Sept 6 and then Dudy butted in on Sept 9.
> Before that we
> all got along.
No, we did not "all get along" before that.
> Dudy even warned me once when I was new and almost posted out.
You really just have to be
Just a challenge feste, on principle, of course and at a level that I thought
she might understand. The reality is I am working against a deadline and don't
have much time to waste on this. But, don't tell her that. I might change my
mind and work to extend my deadline, however unlikely.
-
Hey Judy, it DOES seem a bit like a merry-go-round, that no one can get off, at
this point. In other words, any fresh insights are fully drowned out by the
dynamic, whether it remains valid, or not - and that goes for all of those on
the carousel.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
We might want to call your slam on me on Share's behalf yesterday an
"Unprovoked Mean Boy Attack."
Did you read any of Share's attacks on me that led up to Emily's post, by the
way?
Emily, I don't actually need a break, but if you want to take a turn at
schooling Share, go right ahead.
Alert: Unprovoked Mean Girl Attack!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Dear Share, stop bothering Judy with your incoherent BS. Why don't you stop
acting like a cowardly pansy and come after me? I have no respect for the way
that you treated Ann. I am disgusted with your lack
Dear Share, stop bothering Judy with your incoherent BS. Why don't you stop
acting like a cowardly pansy and come after me? I have no respect for the way
that you treated Ann. I am disgusted with your lack of ability to take
responsibility for yourself in this matter and apologize for your me
Feste, if reading her posts doesn't make you want to throw up, there's no way I
can explain it to you. (It isn't just me, either, you know, who has an acutely
negative reaction to her FFL persona.)
Appreciate the dinner invitation, but if it ever happens, let's talk about
something pleasant,
Yup, Share's bad. Share's hilariously bad. Couldn't have been more fun to
watch. She thought she was gonna get me and got herself instead, but good.
Karma, baby, karma. Instant karma. Auto-smackdown.
Will she learn anything? Of course not. She won't admit--even to herself--that
she fouled up
Wow, Judy, vulgarity and violence in one post! Instinctive taking down of
nastiness quotient?! Oh right, it's hard for you to not be nasty, etc. when
dealing with someone like me. My bad!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Oh, God, I love it. Share gets her tits caught in her ve
Well, agreeing to disagree is a very civilized notion—one that I grew up
with—and it doesn't often appear on FFL. I agree, on reflection, that there are
many examples of you "taking the nastiness component down" but there are other
examples of the opposite, especially with Share, where you crank
BTW, Feste, this exchange with you turned out to be an example of what I meant
when I said I often take the nastiness quotient down a level in my responses.
If you read over the whole thing, you'll see that's just what I've done. I
didn't do it consciously; as I said, it's instinctive.
I wrot
Yes, it was an interesting delving into the human condition yesterday and what
a whirlwind of activity. One person is caught with their underpants down, one
person is banned, another decides Paris is no longer in the cards, still
another and another dig deep and unearth a couple of gems. And the
Oh, God, I love it. Share gets her tits caught in her very own wringer.
She accuses me of being disloyal by not warning indiff he was messing up,
then, thinking she's catching me in a lie, cites a post documenting that I did
warn him he risked being thrown out, way back toward the beginning o
Judy claims she wasn't paying attention to indiff's exchange with emptybill.
Yet see post #363507 excerpted below. So much for Judy's continuing claim to
honesty.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
For the record, indiff, I didn't say you were So-and-so, I said you sounded
like So-
I wasn't paying any attention to his exchange with emptybill..As you know, I've
jumped on him other times when I thought he was out of line.
As to my opinion of you, as you also know, that was formed well before you
disgraced yourself with Robin.
So you can take your dishonest, nasty, mea
So Judy, were you being disloyal recently when you didn't let indiff know that
he was messing up badly? Or you didn't think he was messing up badly?
IMO the disparity between how you treated him and how you treated me clearly
indicates that you are prejudiced against me and not the upholder
Ann, did I tell you I love you today? And, as it goes, "boots are made for
walkin'." As of tomorrow in my house, it is officially holiday season with the
older daughter coming home. She has 4 movies she wants to see: Gravity; Much
Ado About Nothing; The Butler; and Catching Fire. Sounds like a
We'll probably have to agree to disagree, but it seems to me disloyal to not
let a friend know when you feel they've messed up badly. (I'm not suggesting
constant niggling criticism about little stuff, idiosyncrasies and so on.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Loyalty toward
Loyalty toward friends seems to me a better approach than criticizing them.
It's got nothing to do with fear.
You are probably right about the recent banning of that poster. You are not
abusive in the way that he was. You do it in your own style. I actually like
you, authfriend, but your v
You don't criticize your friends? Even if they deserve it? Interesting. Why
not? Are you afraid if you do, they'll no longer be your friends? Because I'd
say it's not much of a friendship that can't survive honest criticism.
I'm not going to go into a long defense, but your description below
To be honest, I didn't care for that post of Share's, but Share is my friend
and I do not criticize my friends.
You have been pursuing a vendetta against Share for more than a year now, I
would guess. She has dealt with you mostly in a civil fashion and has even
tried to engage you in frie
Well, I must admit, I've been quite impressed by Judy's one word accurate
descriptions of the tone of Share's posts. Judy has the maturity to take
responsibility for her language; Share doesn't. Simple. Can you imagine how
poor Share would have behaved if someone went after her appearance an
You know, I don't choose my words at random. I never said my description
applied to all my posts; I never said none of my posts were nasty or vicious. I
stand by what I did say, however.
I've never pretended to be saintly, but I do not, in fact, "love to be mean,
nasty, and vicious." I do fi
Yep, here's authfriend taking the "nasty/vicious quotient of [her] opponent's
posts down a level":
Share snarled:
Share pleaded:
Share babbled:
Share spewed:
Share blubbered:
Share bleated:
All from recent posts. Why can't you be honest about what you do, authfriend?
You are alway
I think in the heat of battle, as it were, the other guy--and/or his or her
supporters--often experiences my posts to be much more "nasty and vicious" than
they actually are. I'm frequently surprised when I reread my own posts from
some epic argument to realize how restrained they were and how I
I think you'd have a real hard time backing that up in my case, feste. But a
no-brainer that Barry would be at the top of the list.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
With all this recent talk about "vicious" and "nasty" posts, if one were to
take a year's worth of FFL posts and
Of course you think that, because you seem unaware of how you come across on
this forum.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I think you'd have a real hard time backing that up in my case, feste. But a
no-brainer that Barry would be at the top of the list.
---In FairfieldLi
31 matches
Mail list logo