Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-18 Thread Don
Yeah, I think this kind of insanity is totally outrageous but at the same time, I am concerned about the purity of the teaching that simply meaning that people in 5, 10, 50 years will have access to the TM program as I know it. That makes me a thought stopper, a dirty rotten fundie? Who's the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-17 Thread Peter Sutphen
--- lupidus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not posting http://www.shareintl.org now here for you since I doubt that you are interested, but for other less predjudiced souls who could be interested in finding out who Maitreya really is. A sattvic figment of Mr. Creme's over active

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-17 Thread Llundrub
When Creme ranks Antoine Nader up with Jesus I'll take notice. - Original Message - From: Peter Sutphen To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 10:42 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] "Purity of the teaching" (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Llundrub
And then it hits him, in a blinding flash of realization,that he's sitting there quivering in his seat, about tobe judged by his betters for the dastardly crime of EatingIce Cream.He starts to laugh. They call him into the room. He can'tstop laughing. He answers none of their questions,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Rick Archer
on 6/16/05 10:20 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Petty tyrants are able to be tyrants only because people allow them to do so. Stand up to them, especially in a way that makes them look ridiculous or causes others to laugh at them, and they turn back into what they always were,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Llundrub
Stand up to them, especially in a way that makes them look ridiculous or causes others tolaugh at them, and they turn back into what they alwayswere, timid little mice given power before they weremature enough to handle it.Unc--Or they take power. To subscribe, send a message to:

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Llundrub
Sounds logical to me. Sounds to me like you're mellowing a bit. Is this a good thing?lurk-Well, when I quit things are a bit more Yamantaka. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Llundrub
One person can handle an individual situation as Unc did. When you're going up against a big, powerful entity (gov't, drug companies, etc) you need group effort. And it works. Our chapter just snuffed out a call for mandatory "mental health" screenings that came from the top (GW) and was

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Peter Sutphen
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lupidus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can understand the decision of this board. I wouldn't want an initiator myself eating ice cream all the time, not being able to take instruction from his teacher or

Re: [FairfieldLife] Purity of the teaching (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics)

2005-06-16 Thread Llundrub
ching" (was Re: Lenz -- Sex and Business Practices / Ethics) ---That phrase is the ultimate thought-stopper, as wielded by the TM fundamentalist. It is *supposed* to stop the discussion. *Nothing* trumps "purity of the teaching." *Anything* is permissible to "def