In a message dated 10/22/06 8:46:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So
you're claiming that we have had some kind of major effect on the House of
Saud post-9/11?
Where did you get that idea? However, if Iraq can be stabilized and
Democracy well established
In a message dated 10/22/06 8:48:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, Iraq was quite prosperous until sanctions
were imposed. Poverty wasn't a big problem. Iraq had made
great strides in education as well under Saddam.
The Sean Penn puppet
In a message dated 10/22/06 10:36:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Duefler report said Saddam was even more dangerous than ever whether
he had stock piles or not because he had the ability and
determination to have them and he had undermined the
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 10/21/06 3:03:33 P.M. Central Daylight
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/06 1:25:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting take. Oil and its products certainly do
not fit or adapt benignly to the earths ecosystem.
Demon sauce; Devil soup! Republican mush! (that's for
Shemp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/06 2:21:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is what MDixon saying contradicting the desire for alternative
modes of energy?
Try reading what he said. He is implying that without oil we would go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/06 2:30:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think he's stating the obvious that the use of oil -- which I, you
and he and everyone else on this forum consumes in abundance -- has
enabled alot of positive
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/06 2:21:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is what MDixon saying contradicting the desire for
alternative
modes of energy?
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/06 2:30:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think he's stating the obvious that the use of oil -- which I,
you
and he and everyone else on
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Bhairitu wrote:You don't know that. There were inventors in the 19th century that got their inventions bought or shoved aside so the oligarchy could stay in power. There is no way of knowing what we might have if it had not been for their interference. For one
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
You don't know that. There were inventors in the 19th century
that
got
their inventions bought or shoved aside so the oligarchy could
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
You don't know that. There were
In a message dated 10/21/06 3:03:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting take. Oil and its products certainly donot fit or adapt
benignly to the earths ecosystem.Demon sauce; Devil soup! Republican mush!
(that's forShemp and MDixon)
Right DrPete. Look
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/21/06 3:03:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting take. Oil and its products certainly do
not fit or adapt benignly to the earths ecosystem.
Demon sauce; Devil soup! Republican mush! (that's for
Shemp and
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/21/06 3:03:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting take. Oil and its products certainly do
not fit or adapt
In a message dated 10/22/06 12:53:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gee,
what an enlightened outlook all of a sudden from the US who had no problem
currently or previously supporting Mubarak in Egypt- military
dictatorship, The House of Saud- oligargical
In a message dated 10/22/06 1:31:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very
typical that you regressives would think things would go backward.
We can move forward to renewable sources of energy and new
technologies for transportation rather than be stuck in the
In a message dated 10/22/06 1:52:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, Iraq was quite prosperous until sanctions were
imposed. Poverty wasn't a big problem. Iraq had made great
strides in education as well under Saddam. The
Sean Penn puppet from
In a message dated 10/22/06 1:25:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting take. Oil and its products certainly do not fit or adapt
benignly to the earths ecosystem. Demon sauce; Devil soup! Republican
mush! (that's for Shemp and MDixon)
Right DrPete.
In a message dated 10/22/06 2:21:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is
what MDixon saying contradicting the desire for alternative modes of
energy? Try reading what he said. He is implying that
without oil we would go back to the horse and buggy era. Not
In a message dated 10/22/06 2:30:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think
he's stating the obvious that the use of oil -- which I, you and he and
everyone else on this forum consumes in abundance -- has enabled alot of
positive things.Speaking for myself, if
In a message dated 10/22/06 4:39:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The overwhelming reason we are there today is to
create a democracy in a region that is traditionally held by dictators or
absolute monarchies that have a reason to suppress their people
and
In a message dated 10/22/06 6:57:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dix,Let me ask you the same question Tim Russert asked Jim
Talent R-Missouri during a debate with his D- Challenger. "If you knew
then, what you know now about going to war in Iraq, would you
--- suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1982, I was sitting on the grass having lunch
with a group of
people in front of one of the frats when the
topic
24 matches
Mail list logo
