Actually that phrasing is ambiguous when it comes to something that's only
speculative. It can mean either that you don't believe it exists, or that if it
did exist, you'd be opposed to it. In the case of the death penalty, we know it
exists, so I don't believe in it can only mean I'm opposed
It isn't a grudge, Barry, and it's hardly weird. There are quite a few of
us here who feel exactly as he does about your behavior (as you may perhaps
have noticed). It's not as if you'd turned over a new leaf since he left, is
it, now?
Nor is it as though you never attacked anybody except in
Heaven forfend that Barry should read the article at the link I posted, which
reports on a recent Gallup survey showing that large majorities of Americans
are in favor of various approaches to gun control.
What Americans have is a political problem in which minorities and special
interest
Right, America is overwhelmingly against any form of gun control.
Oh, wait...
http://www.gallup.com/poll/160085/americans-back-obama-proposals-address-gun-violence.aspx
http://www.gallup.com/poll/160085/americans-back-obama-proposals-address-gun-violence.aspx
---In
And I'm back to America has a political problem, given that the overwhelming
majority of Americans want stricter gun controls, but the appropriate
legislation is consistently blocked by the minority who don't want any gun
controls.
Obviously that political problem has an impact on many other
America also has a very different history from the Netherlands, one in which
guns of necessity played a major role.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
Not really my conversation, but I thought it was also mentioned that diversity
plays a factor. Holland is
Comments below...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
And I'm back to America has a political problem, given that the overwhelming
majority of Americans want stricter gun controls, but the
I'll confirm this from my experience when I lived in NYC.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :
You are extrapolating for about two hundred million of us (urban dwellers).
There is no constant low level fear here. As usual, I don't know anyone who
thinks the
Comment below...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Comments below...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote
I'm sick of your debating tactics, Curtis. Your response here is just more of
same. I shouldn't have stuck with our theism discussion as long as I did. From
now on, when you begin hauling out the old tricks, I'm gone.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
Sure didn't take long for the old Curtis to surface. But I'm not playing any
more, sorry.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
J: I'm sick of your debating tactics, Curtis. Your response here is
Who says they have to?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Why? Because they can't let go of the idea that God doesn't exist. What do
you think?
Let me try that again. Who says they have to let go of the idea that there is
no God in order to transcend?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Judy,
Nobody says they have to. And that's precisely why they can't transcend.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Comments below...
I should also point out that you seem intent to portray anyone who *doesn't*
believe in a God as lesser and on some lower plane of existence.
Sorta like you portray anyone who DOES believe in a God.
snips
My continuing experiences of what he called
Nabs is a fan of Buddha, just not of Buddhists who don't practice TM.
Opsie!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From an interview with David Lynch:
David Lynch’s Heart Opened When…
The director spoke of two times when he was shaken to his core. One was when
he
Actually, there's major scholarly disagreement with the translation within.
Jesus was directly addressing the Pharisees, after all, not making a general
statement; and he'd made it crystal clear that he thought they were corrupt
inside and out. Just contextually, it's extremely unlikely he was
P.S.: The complete sentence is, The Kingdom of God is within/among/in the
midst of you--you meaning the Pharisees. You can't leave off the you
without seriously misrepresenting what Jesus was saying.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Actually, there's major
Nope. But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be
added unto you (Luke 12:31). Matthew has Seek ye first the kingdom of God and
his righteousness... (6:33).
Again, Nabby, Jesus was talking to the Pharisees, who he thought were
spiritually corrupt and incapable of
But believe it or not, there is an Atheism for Dummies book.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
I think it could be a great title for a book, Atheists Can't Transcend
Come to think of it, I don't think I've seen a book in the series along the
lines of
Sure. And for all we know, similar sayings of Jesus to those in the Gospel of
Thomas may have been redacted from the canonical Gospels. But in this case, he
had a very specific point to make to the Pharisees about his identity and their
inability to see him for who he was. He wasn't saying Look
Hmm, I always did wonder where Jesus learned English.
Oh, Barry, you tiddlywink. I just want to hang you up by the collar of your
little sailor suit and pinch those chubby pink cheeks.
(No kidding, folks, Barry's said a lot of unbelievably stupid things here,
especially recently. But this
You know, I missed this part:
If you cannot, please explain to us why we shouldn't consider them mere
examples of spiritual bigotry and hatred, spouted by someone anxious to impose
his notions of an Old Testament God onto Maharishi's notions of Being and
overwrite them...replace them with a
Who thinks of lucid dreaming as mystical or spiritual? I don't think I've
ever heard that one before.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Another fascinating article presenting a different way of looking at
experiences that many would call mystical or spiritual. To a
Barry just hates it when people laugh at his button-pushing attempts. That's
why he snipped this from his quote of Ann's post:
He was posting this to imply that visionaries or those who have had spiritual
or revelatory experiences were most likely diseased in some way. I wonder if he
was
My understanding has been that witnessing dreams is just that, witnessing them,
not trying to change what's happening in them. No?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 1:04
Ann has had Barry's number virtually from the beginning of her time here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Ann,
Well said. You're a very intelligent woman.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Be interesting to compare EEG measurements of lucid dreaming vs. witnessing
dreams, see if they're similar or distinct. I've witnessed dreams, but there
was never any impetus to interfere with them; and I've had a few lucid dreams
in which becoming lucid was the trigger for changing them. For
Comments below...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Judy,
Jesus said many mysterious ideas in his teachings. IMO, he was conveying the
idea of consciousness as the basis of everything to ignorant people, including
the apostles, at that time.
I'm not contesting
Have you ever considered the possibility that those who believe in free will
are just too dull to imagine the world they see around them any other way?
Fish in a barrel, baby...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Have you ever considered the possibility that
FWIW, determinism and predestination are two different things. Predestination
is the doctrine that everything that happens has been destined to happen from
the beginning. Determinism is the doctrine that every action is determined by
the previous action.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Yes, I do know, but actually, I was responding to Bhairitu, not Barry. Really
just a point of possible general interest for anyone following these
discussions.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Uh-oh, Barry's having another ego-crisis. 600-plus words' worth.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
My thanks to both Judy and Ann for responding on cue to my one-liner, and thus
proving that *they* live in a deterministic universe of their own making. :-)
That
Couple comments below...
That was the point of my post, after all. I just thought up the line,
considered it funny, and posted it intentionally using the word determinist
because I knew that Judy would feel she had to respond to it by ragging on
me. And she did. Because *she*
Buck, you're a disgrace. You inveigh against spam but you don't even know
what it is.
And it's hard to believe the dishonesty of referring to Alex as A
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Ranchydog could certainly attempt to give some spiritual or FFL context
Question is, why would you want to suss out someone's trigger words? Why
would you want to make a person your puppet? What kind of sick ego/power trip
is that?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
As a more serious reply, the effect of language on people is
Buck hasn't won anything but the Pain in the Butt Award, IMHO. It's dishonest
of him to claim Alex took what he quoted out of context. What's out of
context is the single sentence Buck quoted, given that what Alex quoted
specifies the sorts of topics that that sentence potentially includes.
EFT has no useful effect as a therapy beyond the placebo effect or any
known-effective psychological techniques that may be used with the purported
'energy' technique, but proponents of EFT have published material claiming
otherwise. Their work, however, is flawed and so unreliable:
Non Sequiturs 'R' Us...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Of course destroying words is no solution at all. But just think how the word
*cancer* can affect people, making their heart race, causing all
Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion?
That's hard to believe.
BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have
one.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples'
Sam Harris insists that free will is just an illusion, so this would be an
excellent topic for Rick to ask about when he interviews Harris, no?
http://www.samharris.org/free-will http://www.samharris.org/free-will
I even suspect that this irrelevance of true/false might be at play
It isn't a matter of whether you agree with it (that's a non sequitur, as are
eating meat on Fridays and the Inquisition), it's why you wouldn't understand
that people who believe abortion involves murdering innocent, helpless human
life are so appalled by it and feel it's their duty to help
Exactly. And also why they want abortion to be illegal.
Why that should be hard to understand, I can't imagine.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :
They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as
the murder of a child.
Did you miss the word allegedly, Barry? It is not a synonym for I
believe...
Well, there's floating during TM-SIdhis pracice, and then there's floating
during daily activity. Allegedly someone fully in Unity could perform any and
all TM-SIdhis at any time, in any circumstance.
And you
Nobody is spamming us, Buck.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Yes, and Om may the Unified Field of our forum community guidelines and our
FairfieldLife community list owner and moderators protect us all from the
spamming spammer who spams us. -Buck in the Dome
You left something out, Buck.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
“Fairfield Life focuses on topics of interest to seekers (and finders) of
truth and liberation everywhere.” Yahoo forums guideline: “Stay on topic.
Although all groups are different, most groups
You'll wait forever, given that Lawson never said he believed it. The rest of
us will just laugh at you and go on about our business (so you can strike the
we and just use I).
Just as an additional point, haven't you seen the reports that many of these
statements about
No, not spam. Alex deletes spam whenever it's posted, so you have nothing to
worry about.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Yes, Pretty much any topic is fair game. But Not Spam. -Buck
authfriend writes:
You left something out, Buck.
“Fairfield
Is there any possibility that you could simply refrain from reading the posts
you aren't interested in instead of demanding self-censorship from us poor
unfortunate Americans?
Oh, and who are the those of us besides yourself?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
I don't think you mean thoughtcrime, Buck. Are you a mind-reader?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Yep, and this FFL is a moderated list particularly around the thoughtcrime of
the posting of spam. As a protection to the life of the group we have a policy
This time Barry missed and excited on another.
Of course, the wish to find out in and of itself doesn't mean no
possibility of sadness or disappointment any more than it means no possibility
of excitement. What's sad is the person who is so emotionally repressed as to
suggest either.
I also strongly disagree with Jim's thesis. However...
This time, Barry missed cancer cannot get a foothold--i.e., cannot flourish
and replicate.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Thank you for the clarity, Curtis, and for taking on this particular meme, and
form
Comments below...
Especially coming from one of the Maharishi enlightened.
What if what has been described as enlightenment in the past
has *absolutely nothing* to do with personality or behavior?
What if, just as those who described it in the past have said,
it is purely about
Isn't that something? Yes, I've said the same thing. I wonder if he remembers
it. I stumbled on it some time ago when I was looking for something else on
alt.m.t, saved it, then forgot I had it until I stumbled over it in my own
files a couple days ago. I suspect it was intended as a putdown of
I think what Barry means by what [they] do in their posts is the spin he puts
on what they say, whether that's what they intended or not--e.g., if you or I
say something negative about Barry, it's because we're trying desperately to
force him to respond to us.
Of course, that cuts both
It's good that you're taking a break from demonstrating your spiritual
advancement by trying to get those who disagree with you, Barry.
While others on this forum demonstrate their spiritual advancement by trying
to get those who disagree with them, you'll have to forgive me if I prefer to
I suspect Richard is referring just to your posts, Buck.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Whoa, TM/MIU/MUM are a sacred posting ground here. The TM/MIU/MUM postings to
FFL are well grandfathered on to FFL as a kind of fact based postulate and
original thought.
Good for Sam Harris. Anyone without a solid understanding of this elementary
truth is not going to get anywhere studying the nature of consciousness.
According to Sam Harris, to say that consciousness may only seem to
exist is to admit its existence in full—for if things seem any way at
Actually, according to the dictionary, meditation can mean several different
things depending on the context. You can use the term in an everyday sense to
mean to think things over, but it doesn't simply mean that, and that isn't
what it means when we use it on FFL or in the context of a
As you know, Knapp hasn't been associated with TM-Free for several years. Mike
Doughney runs it now.
You already did this, over on TM-Free, for John Knapp.
As you know, minet.org is Mike Doughney's Web site.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 5/16/2014 9:55 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
As you know, Knapp hasn't been associated with TM-Free for several years. Mike
Doughney runs it
The first paragraph here is a good example of what Maharishi meant by
Knowledge is structured in consciousness.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
While alive, everybody has experience, consciousness. So 'something' is making
the content of experience visible. There
Almost 900 words devoted to an attempt to make TMers feel bad about themselves.
This, of course, is how Barry makes himself feel Special these days--by
attributing to TMers the fantasies of Specialness that he himself entertained
about TM. Ultimately it didn't work out, so he moved on to Rama
Has anybody else noticed how obsessed with dicks Barry is lately?
(BTW, Barry, Viagra didn't come onto the market until long after you'd beat
feet from the TMO.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Because I was once a teacher, and have no wish to lead prospective
As I believe was mentioned here not long ago, as far as DSM-IV is concerned,
dissociation is to be considered a disorder only if it bothers the person who
is experiencing it.
As should not be a surprise, I completely agree with you that the science of
dissociative disorders pretty
On what basis do you think this?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what
should be done after that.
And he would have known this how, do you think?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the
grapevine that Maharishi said it.
On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
Hoagland, whose conspiracy theory it is, appears to be something of a crackpot.
Look at the last of the links at the end, about India's moon mission:
http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-81.htm
http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-81.htm
I'm highly dubious about the conspiracy
And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you
think?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But
it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an
That isn't a problem with Harris's definition, it's a problem of inadequate
understanding of the nature of the practice (possibly the result of poor
instruction).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Richard, the problem with Sam Harris' definition is that it might
And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women...
On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
I think everyone understands the word he used, nonjudgmental. And it fits
right in with New Age thinking about avoiding judgment. Destroyed makes no
sense. You can't destroy a word. Plus which, Sam Harris was born in 1967, right
at the beginning of the New Age.
And finally, I doubt anyone is
And they perceived and observed the accuracy of this idea how, do you think?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Judy, from their own experience and that of other women they experienced as
being mostly accurate in their perceptions and observations.
On Saturday,
Anybody have any idea what she means by old Yahoo format?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Buck, herein I'm responding from Neo rather than old yahoo format.
On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:20 PM, dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Michael's posts have always looked just fine to me on the Web site. Maybe the
problem is on your end, Buck.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
No, MJ it is odd and unique. It is something [bad and unconventional] with
you. -Buck
mjackson74 writes:
I'm
Just for da record...
I don't need to go into any detail here but just can mention that subjective
experiences were never evaluated separated from behavior. I believe that
Maharishi got that right. I don't need to say any more about that because you
provided more than enough information for
Excellent point, Richard.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 5/17/2014 9:42 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Just a non-sequitur, sitting in this cafe, enjoying the sunny day.
It is triggered by the vision of a
Oh, so you're not talking about the Web site at all. I see.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Judy, first of all, I read FFL posts in my yahoo email inbox. BUT...I have a
choice. I can either read and reply in what yahoo calls Basic format or in what
they call Full
Comments below...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Just for da record...
I don't need to go into any detail here but just can mention that subjective
experiences were never evaluated separated
Of course your question wasn't nonsensical, Share. It was perfectly
reasonable, a good question, in fact. Barry is apparently so eager to diss
TMers that he misread it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
turq wrote: If TM cost less, and were not taught by a cult
I know nothing about Rymer, but what you describe of his interactions with
Maharishi was also true of Robin. There was no conflict between Robin and
Maharishi until he showed up with his group (of mostly TM teachers) in
Fairfield--seven years or so after he had first claimed enlightenment--and
Interestingly, neither of you addressed my point about Xeno's paragraph, much
less refuted it.
Xeno is obviously not a TM-TB. When he describes his own experience, he's
clearly not rehashing Maharishi's teaching. But the paragraph I quoted from
his post (below) is an instance of Knowledge is
Wrong by what criteria?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
There are many things that still surprise me about the things that long-term
TM TBs believe and that I no longer believe, but I admit to having been
somewhat taken aback yesterday at Lawson's seemingly
Psychologists Give People Control of Their Dreams Using Brain Stimulation.
Really? | Science Blogs | WIRED
http://www.wired.com/2014/05/psychologists-give-people-control-of-their-dreams-using-brain-stimulation-really/?cid=social_20140512_23745144
The reason you get attacked, Barry, is that you're so fucking nasty in sharing
your great wisdom with us. You make all kinds of gratuitously demeaning
assumptions about the TMers here, many if not most of which are simply not
true; and you consistently exalt yourself as superior. Plus which,
One more time:
What if what has been described as enlightenment in the past
has *absolutely nothing* to do with personality or behavior?
What if, just as those who described it in the past have said,
it is purely about consciousness, having the ability to directly
perceive eternality 24/7,
Demeaning the TMO is one thing. Demeaning the TMers here is quite another.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Funny thing this, I do TM twice a day and have never felt demeaned by a Barry
rap on the TMO, in fact I agree with a lot of it as I worked there
Comments below...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
I wasn't commenting on what Barry had previously said on other forums
You didn't know that he had said this.
- I was and am addressing what he said here, today. And if you want to throw
down on someone
Jeez. Talk about a river in Egypt. Talk about a guilty conscience. Talk about
projection. Talk about shooting the messengers (good point, Steve). Talk about
out-of-control reactive!
This rap is for those long-term FFL members who claim that their continuing
*personal attacks* against
Somehow I don't think Ann was listing what she thought were attacks on her
livelihood. Somehow I don't think Barry thinks that either.
Ann was presenting Steve with a list of Barry's attacks on her that apparently
don't bother Steve. And that embarrasses Barry, as well it should after
I don't recognize B as representative of any criticism you've ever made,
Barry. Yours almost always include insulting comments about the person you're
addressing.
A. I think that you are a low-life, scum-sucking, dog-humping bastard.
B. I think that the spiritual teacher / celebrity /
As if you never wrote insulting screeds about me or Ann in an attempt to get
FFL members to dislike us because you dislike us. Talk about hypocrisy...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To:
Missed this second bit of incredible hypocrisy, from the dude who wrote almost
750 words of screeching complaint earlier today about TMers attacking and
insulting him:
(Goodness knows I could compile a much longer list of Barry's insults,
including attacks on my livelihood.)
And you
Barry has demeaned my livelihood many times. I can't recall ever demeaning his.
And how is this not what you're referring to?
(BTW, do you know who Squeaky Fromme was?)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
Sure, calling people names is just juvenile.*
Coming
If that was a dome announcement, Buck should be able to tell us what it was
about.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote
Fromme was also a member of the Manson Family, BTW.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
Sure, calling people names is just juvenile.*
Coming after one's family, or demeaning one's
Oh, well, no, I haven't, actually. I've done that very rarely. What an
imagination you have! I have said I think his writing skills mask his lack of
depth, but that's a criticism of his thinking ability, not his writing ability.
He has certainly many times asserted that I can't write. Which
Did you miss Xeno's post, Buck? The charge of the Light Brigade was a disaster.
They were mistakenly sent against a force they were not equipped to fight and
were mowed down in great numbers. They had to retreat with no military gain.
Even though it was obvious they were headed for ignominious
Oh, I don't know, I suppose decent is as good a term as any. Just not
special. Better than most of the posters on FFL. But he's a hack writer, not
an artist.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
Oh, okay, thank you for making that distinction. I guess what is
Uh, Buck, that the charge of the Light Brigade was a disaster rather than a
triumph isn't exactly a detail. It's a tragic story about foolish, mindless
bravery that resulted in unnecessary suffering and death and didn't accomplish
anything. It's about the worst model for a TM mission to Crimea
Your link is unclickable, Dick.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dickmays@... wrote :
Maharishi laughing about the “merry-go-round” of life!
1 - 100 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
