jim_flanegin writes
I've been growing into the opposite realization/experience for awhile
now- being that to experience a total flaming assh*le, rageaholic is
excellent learning just in the experience of it, watching my reaction
to it, being with it. Every moment's here and now, regardless of
TurquoiseB writes:
What do people think? I'm certainly interested to
Hear if such teachings *are* available, or even
Theoretically available in the materials left to the posterity
Of the TM movement.
Unc
Tom T writes:
We currently have a weekly gathering of about 25 to 35 going on here
in
Akasha 108 writes:
So again, is cessation of identification of consciousness with mind --
end of I and me both a necessary and sufficient condition for
enlightenment and or awakening per your POV?
This question is directed specifically to Peter and Vaj, and Tom if he
is around, and certainly
TurquoiseB writes:
Dr. Pete, I've been wondering about this while away
for the weekend. I looked up 'apperception' in the
dictionary ( yes, I had to :-), and I find myself
unsure of the distinction you're making here. Can
you clarify for me the difference you see between
'perception' and
It takes one hell of a lot of love to appear to be a total flaming
assh*le, rageaholic, to the person who needs to hear that anger. The
sage is the delivery vehicle. Delivers what is needed not what is
wanted. The sage does his or her job description which can include
being anything and everything
