[FairfieldLife] Re: Cho, I mean Che

2007-05-09 Thread Jason Spock
 
  And,  Karl Marx was a Racist.
   
  He wanted to fuck and kill blacks.

ShempMcGurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 14:13:33 -
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cho, I mean Che

   
  Che and Cho 
By Humberto Fontova
FrontPageMagazine. com | May 7, 2007

His writings revealed a severely troubled young man. My nostrils 
dilate while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. Crazy 
with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that 
falls in my hands! With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being 
for the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a 
bestial howl!

The term hatred was a constant in his writings: Hatred as an 
element of struggle; hatred that is intransigent;  hatred so 
violent that it propels a human being beyond his natural limitations, 
making him violent and cold- blooded killing machine.

His deranged fantasies included a continental reign of Stalinism. To 
achieve this ideal the troubled youth craved, millions of atomic 
victims.

The troubled young Argentine was aloof and contemptuous towards 
everyone around him: I have no home, no woman, no father, no mother, 
no brothers. My friends are friends only when they think as I do 
ideologically. 

Fortunately for the troubled young Argentine, while a vagabond in 
Mexico city, he had the good fortune to meet an exceedingly shrewd 
judge of the human psyche who quickly became his mentor. This shrewd 
judge, a Cuban exile, properly diagnosed the Argentine's psychosis 
and made an intervention in the nick of time, channeling the 
troubled youth's talents and yearnings toward ends considered 
constructive by the worldwide intelligentsia: establishing Stalinism.

Shortly, the Argentine found himself gainfully employed in Cuba. His 
raging bloodlust was amply indulged in the extermination of anti-
Communist Cubans, a species of mammal that enlightened opinion 
worldwide considers an insufferable pest.

At first the troubled young Argentine took an active role in the mass 
murder of defenseless Cubans, shattering the skulls of the convulsed 
victims with a blast from his own pistol. But given the volume of 
these murders the task proved fatiguing and the Argentine soon 
appointed Cuban henchmen to better facilitate the serial bloodbath. 
Not that he distanced himself from the slaughter. In fact, he took 
such a keen delight in the murder process that a special window was 
constructed in his office allowing him to watch and gloat at the orgy 
of bloodletting in the field below his office.

In this process the Argentine was helping his Cuban mentor establish 
a personal fiefdom that would prove quite enduring, to put it mildly. 
Alas, the (live) Argentine's usefulness to his mentor would prove 
nowhere near as enduring and soon his martyrdom was skillfully 
arranged.

No sane person would wear a Cho t-shirt. No decent person would 
tolerate one in his surroundings. But Che's Guevara's image is 
considered the most reproduced image of the century, gracing 
everything from t-shirts to posters, from thong undies to 
skateboards, from cellphones to infant Onezies. Hollywood hails him 
in blockbuster movies and Time magazine celebrates him among 
the heroes and icons of the century, alongside Mother Theresa.

Any serious analyst of Che's guerrilla campaigns cannot escape the 
conclusion that Ernesto Guevara was actually incapable of applying a 
compass reading to a map. Yet seemingly sane historians place him 
alongside Mao Tse Tung of (the 8,000-mile) long march fame.

In scope, range and duration the Che Guevara farce far surpasses any 
other in modern history. In comparison, The South Sea Bubble was a 
chump operation. Only the modern era's master huckster and media 
manipulator -- with the eager aid of his ever-faithful accomplices in 
the Western media, academia, publishing and filmmaking -- could have 
created a masterful guerrilla warrior and secular saint out of this 
sadist, coward, and epic idiot.

Fidel Castro's influence over the Western intelligentsia can only 
be described as magical, and renders any public evaluation of his 
regime among the smart set completely devoid of logic. To wit:

He brought the world closest of anyone to Nuclear Armageddon. Yet he 
was nominated for a Nobel Peace Price by Norwegian parliamentarians. 
He jailed and tortured at a rate higher than Stalin. Yet Cuba sat on 
the UN's Human Rights Committee. 
His legal code mandates 18 months in prison for anyone overheard 
cracking a joke about him. Yet Jack Nicholson and Chevy Chase sing 
his praises. 
He abolished habeas corpus while his chief hangman (Che Guevara 
himself) declared that judicial evidence is an archaic bourgeois 
detail. Yet Harvard Law School invited him as their guest of honor, 
then erupted in cheers and tumultuous ovations after his every third 
sentence. 
He drove out a higher percentage of Jews from Cuba than Czar Nicholas 
drove from Russia. Yet Shoah Foundation founder Stephen 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cho, I mean Che

2007-05-09 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   And,  Karl Marx was a Racist.

   He wanted to fuck and kill blacks.

In what order?

I mean, if I'm supposed to work up a good hate
for this guy, it would really help to know 
whether he wanted to fuck them first and then
kill them, or...uh...the other way around.

Different order of psycho magnitude, dude.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Cho, I mean Che

2007-05-09 Thread Jason Spock
 
   
  I meant oppression and suppression figuratively.  Don't take it Literaly

TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 16:46:57 -
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cho, I mean Che


In what order?

I mean, if I'm supposed to work up a good hate
for this guy, it would really help to know 
whether he wanted to fuck them first and then
kill them, or...uh...the other way around.

Different order of psycho magnitude, dude.
   
   
  --- Jason Spock jedi_spock@ ... wrote:

 And, Karl Marx was a Racist.
 
 He wanted to fuck and kill blacks.
   

 
-
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cho, I mean Che

2007-05-09 Thread Jason Spock
 
   
   The Original Chinese Fake 
 
  A rivetting, first league biography of Mao, that tells the man from the 
self-manufactured myth, says Ashok Malik  
 
  Posted online: Sunday, July 31, 2005 
  
  IT is a measure of just how thoroughly Jung Chang and Jon Halliday 
researched their subject that their footnotes and index stretch to 153 pages. 
The 659 pages that make up the main story are packed with facts, information, 
revelations about, really, not just Mao but the tempestuous history of China 
from the end of the Manchu empire — in a decade when imperial orders from 
Turkey to Germany to Austria collapsed — to years of civil war, to the surreal 
violence of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, to 1975 and 1976, when, 
within 17 months of each other, Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Tse-tung died and ended 
one of history’s great rivalries. 
  
  Yet the strength of this book is not just in what it says but how it says 
it. Jung Chang and Halliday have produced a first-class biography, a rivetting 
read that, in some sections, resembles a thriller. In particular, chapter 52 — 
‘‘Falling out with Lin Biao’’ — is racy cloak and dagger stuff. It ends with 
Lin Biao and his wife and son fleeing China, only to die in a ‘‘mysterious’’ 
air crash. 
  
  This chapter, more than most others perhaps, brings out the mad dystopia 
that China had become in Mao’s last days. In seems an almost unreal world 
today; yet it is so remarkably evocative of the shadowy and conspiratorial 
inner chambers of Cold War-era dictators. 
  One manifestation of this was in the use of language. When Lin sought to 
ridicule a Mao protege — ‘‘the party no. 7, Zhang Chunqiao’’ — he called him 
‘‘the Cobra... partly because he wore glasses, and partly because of his 
snake-like qualities’’. Lin’s coterie demanded ‘‘the Cobra be ‘put to the death 
of the thousand cuts’.’’ 
   
Lin’s son Li-guo, nicknamed the ‘‘Tiger’’, is the book’s doomed tragic 
hero —‘‘His parents worshipped him, and his mother had sent agents all over 
China to look for the most beautiful young woman to be his wife. Tiger chose a 
sexy fiancee who was intelligent... With her he listened to Western rock music, 
which he adored, and told her: ‘There will be a day when I will let the Chinese 
know there is such wonderful music in the world’.’’ 
   
In 1971, Lin’s son produced ‘‘Outline of Project 571’’: ‘‘Tiger chose 
the name because ‘571’ — wu-qi-yi — has the same pronunciation in Chinese as 
‘armed uprising’.’’ The paper was an indictment of Mao — called ‘‘B-52’’ by 
Tiger, because he ‘‘had a big stomach full of evil thoughts, each one like a 
heavy bomb that would kill masses of people’’ — who deserved assassination. One 
plan was to ‘‘fly helicopters on a suicide mission against Mao on Tiananmen 
Gate’’. 
   
Tiger, say the authors, ‘‘saw right through Mao ... as evil’’. Indeed, 
establishing this assessment is the principal theme of the book. Jung Chang and 
Halliday take pains to tell the Mao the man from his self-glorifying myths. 
They point out he happily invented the ‘‘heroic’’ crossing of the Dadu river 
during the Long March, with — as Edgar P Snow wrote, being fed the version by 
Mao — ‘‘Reds... moving forward on their hands and knees, tossing grenade after 
grenade into the enemy machine-gun nest’’. 
  
  The book debunks the story: ‘‘There was no battle at the Dadu Bridge... 
There were no Nationalist troops... no battle casualties.’’ The 22-man vanguard 
‘‘who, according to the myth, stormed the bridge in a suicide attack’’ were all 
alive and well at a celebration the following week. In truth, Mao simply 
‘‘walked across the Dadu Bridge on 31 May 1935’’. 
   
The Dadu Bridge (non)-episode was characteristic of a man 
‘‘ideologically rather vague’’ with no ‘‘heartfelt commitment’’ to anything 
other than himself. 
   
Indeed Mao joined the Party only when it asked him to manage a 
bookshop: ‘‘Mao had become a Communist — not after an idealistic journey, or 
driven by passionate belief, but by being at the right place at the right time, 
and being given a job that was highly congenial to him. He had been effectively 
incorporated into an expanding organisation.’’ 
  So in the end, the greatest Communist was only a careerist. There’s hope yet 
for the UPA government.
   
by Ashok Malik
   
 
   
   


 
-
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.