On Oct 10, 2005, at 7:02 PM, peterklutz wrote:
> Ok, so control-freaks need not heed MMY's reported 197? comment on
> loosing one's bad habits?
No hard and fast rule, but from this POV you transform the negative,
neurotic dimension of existence into "All-Accomplishing Wisdom".
-
On Oct 10, 2005, at 5:00 PM, peterklutz wrote:
> In the BG MMY says at least two things that might be of guidance. The
> first is that an enlightened individual (another oxymoron..?) always
> acts to promote evolution.
Precisely...and this would be enlightened *activity*...typically the
provin
--- peterklutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -- snip --
>
> > Nicely put. Any concept of "enlightened behavior"
> is
> > more a reflection of a cultural/psychological
> b
On Oct 10, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Peter wrote:
> Nicely put. Any concept of "enlightened behavior" is
> more a reflection of a cultural/psychological boundary
> of the individual than some assessment of
> enlightenment. By the way, I just realized, the term
> "enlightened behavior" is an oxymoron. The
On 10/10/05 3:28 PM, "anonymousff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Interesting point.
>>
>> It's different though as we approach Unity and the "extinction of all
>> phenomenon". There's actually a yogic saying on this which states
>> "Ascend with Conduct, Descend with the View." In other words,
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
snip
>
> I once believed that but I no longer do.
> To me all the whole sheband now means is that
> whoever you are, however
> you act, as you become increasingly free from the
> binding influence of
> acti
