Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-02-05 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 2/5/06 4:26:04 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In the early days (1967-69...early for me at least), Maharishi used to have a pat answer for people who asked him questions about diet and lifestyle and how they should live their lives. He

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 1/27/06 2:32:36 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Either way, they'd never had experience with a violent nutcase on the MUM student body, or at least not THAT violent.You're being intentionally obtuse. The *reason* there was a problem is

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-28 Thread Peter
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 1/27/06 2:32:36 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Either way, they'd never had experience with a violent nutcase on the MUM student body, or at least not THAT violent. You're being intentionally obtuse.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-28 Thread Sal Sunshine
Sure, the enjoyment part.:) They don't seem to be real big on that, unfortunately. Sal On Jan 28, 2006, at 9:30 AM, shempmcgurk wrote: Is there an aspect of the relative which is NOT covered by some TM program?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 1/28/06 9:32:17 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, there's a dictate from the TMO for every aspect of the relative field of activity: what direction to face; what foods to eat (and where, of course, to buy them!); what type of building to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-25 Thread Jamshad Ghanbar
The big selfsparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 1/17/06 1:22 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Yes-Men are the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-18 Thread Vaj
On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:51 PM, jyouells2000 wrote:You're exactly right about the tremendous accomplishment and the change in collective consciousness brought about by the TMO at it's best.What change in collective consciousness? The contributions of 100's of thousands working to bring simple

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 1/17/06 3:01:08 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I weep.When you've been dealing with brainwashed Yes-menfor 40 years, you come to believe you can sayalmost anything and promise almost anything andpeople will believe it. I guess some could

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 1/17/06 1:55:10 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess some could weep, but then don't you think M would be a great villain in an Austin Powers movie?The Yes-Men are the villains...Isn't there SOMEONE around him willing to say: Hey,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread Rick Archer
on 1/17/06 1:22 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Yes-Men are the villains... Isn't there SOMEONE around him willing to say: Hey, Maharishi, can we get around to teaching TM sometime soon so we can spiritually regenerate the world? Say something like that and you're out on

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread Rick Archer
on 1/17/06 3:59 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there SOMEONE around him willing to say: Hey, Maharishi, can we get around to teaching TM sometime soon so we can spiritually regenerate the world? Say something like that and you're out on your ass. Not just because the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 1/17/06 4:02:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As soon as they stop saying 'yes', they're history. Charlie, Jerry,Domash, Donahue, Chopra Haeglin, not yet, but he's salaried. Isn'tit odd that no one stayedJohnY What else could

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread Peter
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 1/17/06 1:55:10 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess some could weep, but then don't you think M would be a great villain in an Austin Powers movie? The Yes-Men are the villains... Isn't there

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
But you gotta admit it's entertaining. What would we have to talk about if they suddenly caught an epidemic of common sense? Sal On Jan 17, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Peter wrote: I think one problem is that the TB's believe that MMY is knowledgable in all things. As if every utterance he makes

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 1/17/06 10:53:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The contributions of 100's of thousands working to bring simpleconsciousness closer to the surface. It's just not available now. That's the point. Bingo, M and the TMO have run them off!

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM bonds -- too good to be true?

2006-01-17 Thread Rick Archer
on 1/17/06 10:42 PM, mainstream20016 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mainstream20016 writes: Despite the consistent disappointments delivered to TMers via the TMO (MMY), I think that MMY and his organization have accomplished a great deal in their 50 year history. Many, many thousands