On 8/14/2014 6:51 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I think we should make a new FFL rule that you be required to make a
minimum of 25 posts a week.
>
Also:
1. You may not bait, troll, or lurk on FFL with intent to trip or flame.
Baiting is defined as posting with a clear
On 8/14/2014 11:03 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bhairitu, you do realize don't you that woo woo is a relative term and
some people might put ayurveda in that category and many more would
definitely put jyotish there. Go figger (-:
>
Apparently Barry 2 doesn't seem
On 8/14/2014 10:55 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bhairtiu is concerned about "banksters". Banker | Gangster =
bankster. They have ways of making your life miserable and the public
shouldn't tolerate them.
Of course woo woo types like to stick their heads in the
or else you have to take the FFL challenge, which consists of dumping a bucket
of popcorn over your head. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote : I think we should make a new FFL rule that you be
required to make a minimum of 25 posts a week. ---In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
you ever had anything to contribute that was worth reading
"in the past" but 18 years is a long time to have been posting on the internet
so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu
about the 1971 Stanford Research Institute study. Based
on the short writeup below, I don't see anything odd about their methodology --
they sent out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random
from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of them, and just did the math. The
Are you calling me a prick? (-:---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote :
Mac writes:
"Barry = balloon. Steve = pin."
OK, this is the funniest sentence I have read in a long time.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : On 8/14/2014
8:25 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:f
I think we should make a new FFL rule that you be required to make a minimum
of 25 posts a week. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote : Wrong! I already know which cell provider
works best in rural Iowa: US Cellular. What truly concerns me, to the point of
obsession, is people not choos
Just kiddin' around.
From: "steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Yes, you are right. I didn't sleep
dLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:57 AMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Ha, good one!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : On 8/14/2014
6:48 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Stev
Ah ha ha ha - damn - where did the modesty go? That is LOL funny. ---In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Ahem, I
believe I'm overLY concerned.Aand, it's not about water's properties --
it's about radiation's ability to make water PURE and ORDERLY.It's the light,
not the water
ime to have been posting on the internet
so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:26 PMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned
up below, I don't see anything odd about their methodology --
they sent out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random
from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of them, and just did the math. The
math doesn't look particularly good for TM.
From: "LEnglish5@... [Fairfi
Thanks - Steve's take was brilliant - there must be a formula whereby as
arrogance increases, the inability to see yourself as others see you, markedly
decreases. :-)---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Mac writes:
"Barry = balloon. Steve = pin."
OK, this is the funniest sentence
Bhairitu, you do realize don't you that woo woo is a relative term and some
people might put ayurveda in that category and many more would definitely put
jyotish there. Go figger (-:
On Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:55 AM, "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
[FairfieldLife]" wrote:
Bhairt
Bhairtiu is concerned about "banksters". Banker | Gangster = bankster.
They have ways of making your life miserable and the public shouldn't
tolerate them.
Of course woo woo types like to stick their heads in the sand and never
pay any attention to what is going on in the world because it mi
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Ahem, I
believe I'm overLY concerned.Aand, it's not about water's properties --
it's about radiation's ability to make water PURE and ORDERLY.It's the light,
not the water that fascinates me. Jesus too, I understand.
And here I thought yo
Mac writes:
"Barry = balloon. Steve = pin."
OK, this is the funniest sentence I have read in a long time.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : On 8/14/2014
8:25 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:fleetwood_macncheese@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
o I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:26 PMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Lawson
Judy is over concerned with Ba
actually had things to contribute, but those days
are now mainly a thing of the past.
From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:26 PMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Law
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Wrong! I already know which cell provider works best in rural Iowa: US
Cellular. What truly concerns me, to the point of obsession, is people
not choosing their own cell phone providers according to *my* criteria
and expectations.
>
On 8/14/2014
Ahem, I believe I'm overLY concerned.Aand, it's not about water's
properties -- it's about radiation's ability to make water PURE and
ORDERLY.It's the light, not the water that fascinates me. Jesus too, I
understand.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Wrong! I
already know which cell provider works best in rural Iowa: US Cellular. What
truly concerns me, to the point of obsession, is people not choosing their own
cell phone providers according to *my* criteria and expectations.
Alex, the man wh
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : oops,
Lawson.. have to think a little more about that. little touchy I
think
I think Lawson was referring to another one of bawee's insufferable diatribes,
one that we've heard 99 times before, not what you wrote.
---In FairfieldLif
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Barry is over
concerned with Lawson Judy is over concerned with Barry
Richard is over concerned with Fred Lenz
Emily is over concerned with Share
Share is over concerned with Jupiter's transit
Steve is over concerned with day to day tribulations an
Wrong! I already know which cell provider works best in rural Iowa: US
Cellular. What truly concerns me, to the point of obsession, is people not
choosing their own cell phone providers according to *my* criteria and
expectations.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Barry is
over co
ur@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:26 PMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Lawson
Judy is over concerned with Barry
Richard is over concerned with Fred Lenz
Emily is over concerned
P.S. - It would be correct to say overly concerned rather than over concerned.
From: "steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation a
If I ever meet anyone who is, I'll clap too.
From: "fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
LOL - Nail
;steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Jesus Christ Michael, at least you've got a sense of humor.
I'll take your reply as a compliment.
Th
"wrong" about the 1971 Stanford Research Institute study. Based
on the short writeup below, I don't see anything odd about their methodology --
they sent out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random
from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of them, and just did the m
rquoiseb@... wrote : Now tell us what you think was
"wrong" about the 1971 Stanford Research Institute study. Based on the short
writeup below, I don't see anything odd about their methodology -- they sent
out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random from TMO
Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:26 AMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Lawson
Judy is over concerned with Barry
Richard is over concerned with Fred Lenz
Emily is over concerned with Share
Share is over concerned with Jupiter's transit
Steve i
to contribute, but those days
are now mainly a thing of the past.
From: "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:26 PMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Lawson
Judy
Pretty funny, but mostly incorrect.
From: "steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:26 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Laws
ursday, August 14, 2014 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Barry is over concerned with Lawson
Judy is over concerned with Barry
Richard is over concerned with Fred Lenz
Emily is over concerned with Share
Share is over concerned with Jupiter's transit
Steve is
tionnaires to 1,900 people,
selected pretty much at random from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of
them, and just did the math. The math doesn't look particularly good for TM.
From: "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent
ink was "wrong" about the 1971 Stanford Research Institute study. Based
on the short writeup below, I don't see anything odd about their methodology --
they sent out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random
from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of them, and
ing odd about their methodology --
they sent out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random
from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of them, and just did the math. The
math doesn't look particularly good for TM.
From: "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
Fairfi
I don't see anything odd about their methodology --
they sent out questionnaires to 1,900 people, selected pretty much at random
from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of them, and just did the math. The
math doesn't look particularly good for TM.
From: "LEnglish5@... [Fairfie
selected pretty much at random from TMO lists, received replies from 47% of
them, and just did the math. The math doesn't look particularly good for TM.
From: "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, Aug
gust 13, 2014 10:30
AMSubject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Now tell us what you think was "wrong" about the 1971 Stanford Research
Institute study. Based on the short writeup below, I don't see anything odd
about their methodology -- they sent out questionnaires to
good for TM.
From: "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 4:22 PMSubject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
That German "study" was based on a "snowball" selection of subjects...
Subjects
you previously claimed. Go figure.>
From: "'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday,
August 12, 2014 1:45 PMSubject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
On
8/12/2014 10:21 AM, Michael
replies from 47% of
them, and just did the math. The math doesn't look particularly good for TM.
From: "lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Fairfie
>claimed. Go figure.>
From: "'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... mailto:punditster@...
[FairfieldLife]"
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.comTo: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:45
PMSubject: Re: [Fai
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:45 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
On 8/12/2014 10:21 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com
<mailto:mjackso...@yahoo.com> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Sometimes real science does come in handy:
>
The poor Nerd, he doesn't even
rom:* "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:29 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Michael, it's just logic. If you think TM is bad for everyone, then
you sho
to your absurd statement that I believe only Sal and I
knew who TM was good for.
*From:* "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
*Sent:* Tuesda
On 8/12/2014 10:56 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Michael, I simply followed the logic of what you've said. You've said
that it's fine with you that salyavin does TM. You've also shared how
you like talking people out of doing TM. So what's the difference
between sa
Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:56 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Michael, I simply followed the logic of what you've said. You've said
that it's fine w
t;
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:29 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Michael you've stated that it's fine for salyavin to practice TM. And
you've also shared that you're happy when you talk someone o
August 12, 2014 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
On 8/12/2014 10:21 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
>Sometimes real science does come in handy:
>
The poor Nerd, he doesn't even realize that Lawson and Judy ripped
On 8/12/2014 10:21 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Sometimes real science does come in handy:
>
The poor Nerd, he doesn't even realize that Lawson and Judy ripped to
shreds years ago these so-called German Study on TM.
>
Otis (1984) described a study done at
r absurd statement that I believe only Sal and I knew who
TM was good for.
From: "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] M
d shrinker.
From: "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Michael, it's just logic. If you think TM is ba
was referring to your absurd statement that I believe only Sal and I knew who
TM was good for.
From: "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:56 AM
Subject: Re
11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Michael, I simply followed the logic of what you've said. You've said that it's
fine with you that salyavin does TM. You've also shared how you like talking
people out of doing TM. So what's the difference between saly
Michael, I simply followed the logic of what you've said. You've said that it's
fine with you that salyavin does TM. You've also shared how you like talking
people out of doing TM. So what's the difference between salyavin and those
people?
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:29 AM, "Share Long sh
st 12, 2014 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation and Science
Michael you've stated that it's fine for salyavin to practice TM. And you've
also shared that you're happy when you talk someone out of doing TM. So it
sounds like you're saying that TM is good fo
Michael you've stated that it's fine for salyavin to practice TM. And you've
also shared that you're happy when you talk someone out of doing TM. So it
sounds like you're saying that TM is good for some people and that only you and
salyavin are capable of saying who it's good for.
On Tuesday,
Sometimes real science does come in handy:
Otis (1984) described a study done at Stanford Research Institute in 1971 to
determine the negative effects of Transcendental Meditation. SRI mailed a
survey to every twentieth person on the Students International
Meditation Society (TM's parent organi
62 matches
Mail list logo
