Rick Archer wrote:
>on 11/12/05 12:14 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>>>And that's typically only the lowest level of shaktipat...Chapter six
>>>of the tantraloka describes all the 9 levels, and many of these
>>>require a certain level of realization to impart.
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Nov 12, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> on 11/12/05 12:14 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> And that's typically only the lowest level of shaktipat...Chapter
>>> six
>>> of the tantraloka describes all the 9 levels, and many of these
>>> require a certain level of realiza
on 11/12/05 12:14 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> And that's typically only the lowest level of shaktipat...Chapter six
>> of the tantraloka describes all the 9 levels, and many of these
>> require a certain level of realization to impart.
>>
>>
> I doubt that. Shakti is shakti.
Th
Vaj wrote:
>On Nov 12, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>
>
>>Rick Archer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
From a friend:
>>>Sounds like Indian diksha is different than American. This is
>>>SERIOUSLY
>>>powerful stuff. Why don't you give it a try and see for yourself?
>>>These
>
On Nov 12, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Rick Archer wrote:
>
>>> From a friend:
>>
>> Sounds like Indian diksha is different than American. This is
>> SERIOUSLY
>> powerful stuff. Why don't you give it a try and see for yourself?
>> These
>> people are sincere. There's no pushing to g
Rick Archer wrote:
>>From a friend:
>
>Sounds like Indian diksha is different than American. This is SERIOUSLY
>powerful stuff. Why don't you give it a try and see for yourself? These
>people are sincere. There's no pushing to go to the India course. There's NO
>levels. As a matter of fact they em
>From a friend:
Sounds like Indian diksha is different than American. This is SERIOUSLY
powerful stuff. Why don't you give it a try and see for yourself? These
people are sincere. There's no pushing to go to the India course. There's NO
levels. As a matter of fact they emphasize that you don't hav
