No break needed, Bhairitu, I read the whole article. What was it you thought I
had missed?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I'll cut you are break that you probably didn't read the full article because
it is very long. Towards the end he discussed Starbucks' issues. A week or
I'll cut you are break that you probably didn't read the full article
because it is very long. Towards the end he discussed Starbucks'
issues. A week or so ago I posted an article about the disparity in
pricing at Starbucks in different areas of the world and how the Chinese
are paying the mos
OK, it's just that Starbucks has been very firm that they have no intention of
replacing their baristas with robots. I suspect the "word was" from reporters
who thought pretending Starbucks was considering it would grab eyeballs (or
earballs, in your case). Apparently they were right. ;-) Barry
On the radio (remember those). But I was actually searching for the
article when I came across Starbucks automation page. Here is one
recent story about coffee automation:
http://qz.com/134661/briggo-coffee-army-of-robot-baristas-could-mean-the-end-of-starbucks-as-we-know-it/
On 10/28/2013 03
The word was from where/whom?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Those are probably for businesses like the place where Turq works and also
probably might make sense for some convenience stores. But the word was these
may also replace a baristas at some regular Starbucks. I wo
Those are probably for businesses like the place where Turq works and
also probably might make sense for some convenience stores. But the
word was these may also replace a baristas at some regular Starbucks. I
would have to see how much a Seattle's Best machine costs. We have
those a Safeway
You'd really have to like coffee to buy one for personal use - 15K for the
small one (164 drinks), and 19K for the bigger one - (850 drinks).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Following up on Turq's post about the automated espresso machine at
work, here's Starbuck's machines:
