There's plenty of other souces available to learn of MMY's many
indescretions with women (including the sexie sadie files on this
site), although I'm sure Conny will have something to say as well.
FWIW, the Great Shankara Himself, according to Shankara-dig-vijaya
by Maadhava VidyaaraNya,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's plenty of other souces available to learn of MMY's many
indescretions with women (including the sexie sadie files on this
site), although I'm sure Conny will have something to say as well.
FWIW, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
There's plenty of other souces available to learn of MMY's many
indescretions with women (including the sexie sadie files on this
site),
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:25 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
One would hope you wanted to know the truth about your teacher, no? I
would hope we all would.
David Fiske wrote:
I've read it as he sent me an electronic copy
Does Conny say anything about the Maharishi being a perv as claimed
by Vaj?
Vaj wrote:
He is supposed to have an English version of his
biography out. I know the Swedish version has been
out for a while, just not certain on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Fiske wrote:
I've read it as he sent me an electronic copy
Does Conny say anything about the Maharishi being a perv as claimed
by Vaj?
Vaj wrote:
He is supposed to have an English version of his
I knew Conny from Rishikesh 1971, a most likeable fellow. I would
consider his testimony very reliable. Do you know that when he left
Maharishi Maharishi gave him his deerskin as a memento.
Love,
David
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This swedish
He is supposed to have an English version of his biography out. I
know the Swedish version has been out for a while, just not certain
on the English one.
It will be interesting to hear what he has to say.
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:49 AM, David Fiske wrote:
I knew Conny from Rishikesh 1971, a
I've read it as he sent me an electronic copy
-
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He is supposed to have an English version of his biography out. I
know the Swedish version has been out for a while, just not certain
on the English one.
It will be
Could you give a review? Anything earth shattering?
On Jan 31, 2007, at 9:17 AM, David Fiske wrote:
I've read it as he sent me an electronic copy
David Fiske wrote:
I knew Conny from Rishikesh 1971, a most likeable fellow.
Someone has a faulty memory, David!
When I came to you in 1978 I was in despair due to the fact that
I had left my Master Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in 1976, mostly due to
organisational reasons. During my time with him I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Fiske wrote:
I knew Conny from Rishikesh 1971, a most likeable fellow.
Someone has a faulty memory, David!
Quite right last course 1969. How did you know that? And does it matter?
--- nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote:
This swedish fellow was unable to understand the
nature of one great
saint. Then he moves along to another, Sai Baba, and
again he is unable.
Apparently Sai Baba told him to go home; he would
father a son. When
Connies wife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote:
This swedish fellow was unable to understand the
nature of one great
saint. Then he moves along to another, Sai Baba, and
again he is unable.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote:
This swedish fellow was unable to understand the
nature of one great
saint. Then he moves along to another, Sai Baba, and
again he is unable.
Apparently
David Fiske wrote:
Someone has a faulty memory, David!
Quite right last course 1969.
How did you know that?
Because I was at Rishikesh in 1971 and didn't see Conny anywhere
around, but later I met him in Houston.
And does it matter?
According to Conny, he never heard of Dr. Hislop,
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:00 PM, cardemaister wrote:
FWIW, Swedes are notoriously bad
loosers... :)
And even badder losers! :0
Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be the first
published reference to the Pervarishi Effect--even though the
Yonified Field has been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be
the first published reference to the Pervarishi Effect
Just so everyone is aware, by Pervarishi Effect
Vaj is referring to his claim that MMY is a pervert.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be
the first published reference to the Pervarishi Effect
Just so everyone is aware, by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:00 PM, cardemaister wrote:
FWIW, Swedes are notoriously bad
loosers... :)
And even badder losers! :0
Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be the first
published
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be
the first published
Vaj wrote:
Then you probably won't like his memoir.
So, now you're a Sweedish reader.
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:35 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be
the first published reference to the Pervarishi
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Then you probably won't like his memoir.
So, now you're a Sweedish reader.
No, I just read the English translation today.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:35 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
Then you probably won't like his memoir.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:35 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
One would hope you wanted to know the truth about your teacher, no? I
would hope we all would.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
One would hope you wanted to know the truth about your teacher, no?
I
would hope we all would.
How does posting lies help us know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
One would hope you wanted to know the truth about your teacher, no? I
would hope we all would.
Why do I care? Why do YOU care? What
So, now you're a Sweedish reader.
Vaj wrote:
No, I just read the English translation today.
You are supposed to read the book BEFORE you make your comments.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
One would hope you wanted to know the truth about your teacher, no?
I
would hope we all would.
Truth? I saw a picture of your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:07 PM, sparaig wrote:
Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
One would hope you wanted to know the truth about your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:35 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote:
This swedish fellow was unable to understand the
nature of one great
saint. Then he moves
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You left out the part about Sai Baba playing with
Connie's penis.
The thing that's most fascinating to me about this
whole discussion, since I've never had any attraction
whatsoever to Sai Baba (siddhis don't impress me much,
Slight correction:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yet another aspect of the same phenomenon can be
seen (in my estimation) in the thread asking for
people's criteria for *deeming* someone enlightened.
If you'll notice, many of the people who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think we're seeing the same phenomenon, to some
extent, in the people here who get uptight and start
attacking others when they question Maharishi's
enlightenment. Even though even *they* admit some-
times that
This swedish fellow was unable to understand the nature of one great
saint. Then he moves along to another, Sai Baba, and again he is unable.
Apparently Sai Baba told him to go home; he would father a son. When
Connies wife conscieved a daughter he became furious.
Whatever you hear or read
38 matches
Mail list logo
