--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
[...]
Third, what is wrong with either you or he believing
this? He is permitted to believe anything he wants, as
are you. You'll notice that Chopra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
[...]
Third, what is wrong with either you or he believing
this? He is
On Feb 23, 2008, at 4:05 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
I'm saying all this because it's in the wind
these days. We're seeing the same phenomenon on
a larger scale in the Democratic race for the
Presidential nomination. One person in that race
firmly believes (based on her consistent behavior)
that
On Feb 23, 2008, at 9:31 AM, authfriend wrote:
But as long as those three big states are hanging in
the balance, and as long as the delegate count and
the national polls don't show an overwhelming lead
for Obama, I think she should stick it out.
Great analysis--thanks Judy.
I don't think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 23, 2008, at 4:05 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
I'm saying all this because it's in the wind
these days. We're seeing the same phenomenon on
a larger scale in the Democratic race for the
Presidential
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:23 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
frank3373@ wrote:
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape
when
Chopra was active in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:23 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
frank3373@ wrote:
This post begs two
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
frank3373@ wrote:
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape when
Chopra was active in the early 90's? What is different now and then?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
frank3373@ wrote:
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape when
Chopra was active in the early 90's? What is different now and then?
2) What is wrong with the current state of the TM org other than
everything is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Third, what is wrong with either you or he believing
this? He is permitted to believe anything he wants, as
are you. You'll notice that Chopra (as far as I know)
does NOT go out of his way the way you do to
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape when
Chopra was active in the early 90's? What is different now and then?
2) What is wrong with the current state of the TM org other than
everything is too expensive (in the US), but that has been the case
for a long time. --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape when
Chopra was active in the early 90's? What is different now and then?
2) What is wrong with the current state of the TM org other than
He said that when Maharishi first came to Holland Deepak got Tony
Nadar's attention and said Let's take a walk.
During that walk he told Tony about all the details of Maharishi's
near death illnesses and his time in England.
Deepak said that upon hearing this, Tony was in shock and said
Tony's disbelief is one huge tell.
What a true believer he must be. And how dangerous to any would-be
TMO historian, eh?
If the story is true, it pretty much locks me into hopelessness that
the TMO would ever come around to sanity.
All of the TMO's robes and crowns and sheer crappola could be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, william108wm
william108wm@ wrote:
Deepak said that upon hearing this, Tony was in shock and
said to him I don't believe a word of this.
And nor do I.
This whole
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, william108wm
william108wm@ wrote:
Deepak said that upon hearing this, Tony was in shock and said to
him
I don't believe a word of this.
And nor do I.
This whole story of Chopra starts to stink more and more as persons
that where there tell
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, william108wm
william108wm@ wrote:
Deepak said that upon hearing this, Tony was in shock and
It's fun to lace up the golf shoes and
walk over King Tony's incredulousness,
but in fairness, this incident took
place 17 years ago. Lots of us were
believers then. Bevan's remarks after
Maharishi died led me to believe that
his Ramness cared for Maharishi in
his final days. If Tony didn't
And to think, I used to wonder what Tony's qualification was for
becoming the Raja Raam.
His most expensive book ever and declaration that he saw Veda in the flesh.
Thus M gave him his body weight in gold. Which he then split with Bevan in
chocolate.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
frank3373@ wrote:
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape when
Chopra was active in the early 90's? What is different now and then?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Frank McLaughlin
frank3373@ wrote:
This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape
when
21 matches
Mail list logo
