--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So where does GW Bush's dharma as a child of privelege fit into all
this? If a demonstrably enlightened dictator took over the USA, that
might be nice while he is alive, but will all his descendents be
enlightened? The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Considering how the so-called enlightened leadership
has run the TMO into the ground, I have not the
slightly doubt in my mind that they would be even
worse leaders than Dubya and his cabinet of cowering
yes-men.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess it's no surprise that Maharishi's political theories
go back centuries. His model is Vedic society, which is what,
tens of thousands of years old?
And which may have never existed, except as a fantasy
in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/24/05 10:37 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi doesn't like labor governments.
His comment on Britain's Labor
---OriginalMessage--
From: "Robert Gimbel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:02:04 - Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi on Government, was: Dome total numbers
I always assumed that Maharishi had suscribed to Plato and Socrates;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 10/24/05 10:37 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Maharishi understands what a government
is, period.
He's lived in never-never land all of his life, inside
ashrams and then at the
on 10/24/05 2:14 PM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else remember this moment at the giant course in India in early
1981? Someone asked M very directly about what is the best form of
government or some such thing. This question came after he was
damning Democracy (in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 10/24/05 10:37 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think Maharishi understands what a government
is, period.
I didn't go on that course, but I remember hearing people say that they should come prepared to stay in tents and to bring sleeping-bags--in addition to suits and ties and silk dresses! Also that there were no doctors anywhere. At least one friend of mine came back with an sickness nobody could
People around me in the Hotel was so sick that we had to get Indian
Doctors, who gave them shots of Opium to stop the diarrhoea. The
Indians called the course participants for the
tubercolous. It was not a good marketing for TM.
Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/24/05 10:37 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi doesn't like labor governments.
His comment on Britain's Labor
Party: They are laborers. They shouldn't
be running the government. Give
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 10/24/05 2:14 PM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else remember this moment at the giant course in India in
early
1981? Someone asked M very directly about what is the best form of
government
I always assumed that Maharishi had suscribed to Plato and Socrates;
In regard to the highest form of government; after taking a course
at MIU; back in the day.
The highest form of government according to the Ancient Greeks;
Was a ruler called a Philosopher King
The idea was to create a program;
Considering how the so-called enlightened leadership
has run the TMO into the ground, I have not the
slightly doubt in my mind that they would be even
worse leaders than Dubya and his cabinet of cowering
yes-men.
--- Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always assumed that Maharishi had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Considering how the so-called enlightened leadership
has run the TMO into the ground, I have not the
slightly doubt in my mind that they would be even
worse leaders than Dubya and his cabinet of cowering
yes-men.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason [Maharishi] doesn't like democracies is that he doesn't consider
the
common man qualified to have a say in governmental policy. He thinks that
individuals should just concern themselves with their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paula Youmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason he doesn't like democracies is that he doesn't consider the
common man qualified to have a say in governmental policy.
Something our founding fathers agreed with...
on 10/24/05 6:11 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 10/24/05 2:14 PM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else remember this moment at the giant course in India in
early
1981? Someone asked M
Enlightened monarchies only work if the people they rule are also enlightened. An enlightened monarch will be executed by an ignorant mob. On the other hand, an ingorant monarch will lynch the citizens, ie., Stalin, Hitler, etc., so one without the other is worthless. In Sat Yuga, everyone is
19 matches
Mail list logo
